If You Thought Quantum Mechanics Was Weird, You Need to Check Out 'Entangled Time'... | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77791786 United States 07/06/2019 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74070273 United States 07/06/2019 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AkashicRecord®
(OP) User ID: 73229636 United States 07/06/2019 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77005613 Slovenia 07/06/2019 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Endure User ID: 77779603 United States 07/06/2019 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think of time as being a series of timelines, strung together, sometimes overlapping. Groups of time events. Time is past, time is present, time is future. Past is sad, present is fleeting, future is unknown and can be scary, fear of the unknown. Control of time is fascinating. The past time is done and we exert no control over it. The present can be put under a time control because we have been given the freedom to affect our time in the present although we can’t stop it moving forward. The time of the future is the unknown, even down to its existence, which could be halted by our Creator. So of all three I would say that future time may have entanglements? Future time is being battled over. Huge angelic battles, much more “real” than our existence, for control of future time. So entanglements that must be untangled to move forward or straighten out the future timeline. Just some thoughts. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77119396 United States 07/06/2019 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hub Cap Halo
User ID: 76712268 United States 07/06/2019 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77119396 United States 07/06/2019 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JADR+
User ID: 72063419 Australia 07/06/2019 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've had a passing interest in quantum computing recently, and this one came across my radar: Quoting: AkashicRecord® [link to www.sciencealert.com (secure)] (snip) Up to today, most experiments have tested [quantum] entanglement over spatial gaps. The assumption is that the 'nonlocal' part of quantum nonlocality refers to the entanglement of properties across space. But what if entanglement also occurs across time? Is there such a thing as temporal nonlocality? The answer, as it turns out, is yes. I think there are essentially two different versions of time. 1) The Planck time clock tick In quantum mechanics, the Planck time (tP) is the unit of time in the system of natural units known as Planck units. A Planck time unit is the time required for light to travel a distance of 1 Planck length in a vacuum, which is a time interval of approximately 5.39 × 10 −44 s.[1] The unit is named after Max Planck, who was the first to propose it. 2) The time variable t when an event happened. I make this distinction because the universe likes to maintain the illusion of causality and consistency despite it's many logic defying weird quantum features. So to maintain this illusion & reduce paradoxes, no matter how the initial process happened, it can revise history, and modify the t variable of distinct events. Then scientist conclude retro-causality when all we have is revised history. I'm a J & proud zio. OrangeManBad NFTs: [link to opensea.io (secure)] FE Challenge: Provide a formula which calculates the exact distance between 2 GPS coordinates that does not use the Earth's radius of 6,371 km in it's assumptions JADR+ |
jalijkh
User ID: 73714837 United States 07/06/2019 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77069507 United States 07/06/2019 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76174143 United States 07/06/2019 11:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AkashicRecord®
(OP) User ID: 73229636 United States 07/07/2019 12:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can't thank you any more than you know... Last Edited by AkashicRecord® on 07/07/2019 12:09 AM Sorry, that message is no longer in the database. |
AkashicRecord®
(OP) User ID: 73229636 United States 07/07/2019 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76806425 United States 07/07/2019 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74996941 France 07/07/2019 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've had a passing interest in quantum computing recently, and this one came across my radar: Quoting: AkashicRecord® [link to www.sciencealert.com (secure)] (snip) Up to today, most experiments have tested [quantum] entanglement over spatial gaps. The assumption is that the 'nonlocal' part of quantum nonlocality refers to the entanglement of properties across space. But what if entanglement also occurs across time? Is there such a thing as temporal nonlocality? The answer, as it turns out, is yes. I don't understand how phyicists have not already understood all of this for the solution is very easy: The macrocopic scale prevents us to see and measure the oneness of the particles. Two entangled particles are but ONE particle in their microscopic scale and realm. That is why they are entangled in space AND time. This is not the experiment which triggers the entanglement, but the entanglement (oneness) that is hightlighted by the experiment. |
AkashicRecord®
(OP) User ID: 73109011 United States 07/07/2019 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Around 2 minutes into this talk is a rather dumbed down explanation of how quantum computers work, even though they are still in their infancy. Only a few of them exist, and they cost millions of dollars: [link to youtu.be (secure)] Sorry, that message is no longer in the database. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77158128 United States 07/07/2019 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74181868 United States 07/07/2019 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nonsense... There is no electron. There is no particle Can you send a Hertz through space? A decibel through time? Yeah, sure, whatever pleases you. You can worship the sample rate of your computers microphone and the voltage of your line out,if you want. |
Rock Hard
User ID: 75475410 Australia 07/07/2019 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | some of this stuff makes me go to sleep. In a good way as in thinking. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77794863 Netherlands 07/07/2019 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Plato
User ID: 77134059 United States 07/07/2019 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Taoism basically, no? Nice thread too. Last Edited by Plato on 07/07/2019 05:22 PM sub veste, invenimus in homine. Sub hominem, invenimus ejus nucleus. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77794863 Netherlands 07/07/2019 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77794863 Netherlands 07/07/2019 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AkashicRecord®
(OP) User ID: 73109011 United States 07/07/2019 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh apear at the same time only elevation of self different /: , oh buggers Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77794863 I think that this bot's quantum computing got screwed up along,the way. Anyhoo, I'm pulling part of a response from a different thread into this one because it's somewhat relevant: NECS CEO is being interviewed right now [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76145065 Been watching it now for a while. Pretty good stuff! He mentions upcoming "killer apps" for quantum computing... One of these would likely be perfect price prediction and forecasting (which could be disastrous for 'legacy' markets) and another might entail searching and social networking... You'd go to Google to search for something and the results would instantly be in response to what you were currently thinking about... Quantum computing will be absolutely required for the scaling of cryptocurrencies going forward into the future. It will likely be that only a handful of government-owned and publicly-shared multi-million dollar quantum computers will be processing cryptocurrency transaction data and such... Sorry, that message is no longer in the database. |
Plato
User ID: 77134059 United States 07/07/2019 08:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73645104 Denmark 07/07/2019 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70568610 United States 07/07/2019 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AkashicRecord®
(OP) User ID: 73334408 United States 07/07/2019 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did you know that Marty McFly was actually (originally) Eric Stoltz? [link to youtu.be (secure)] Sorry, that message is no longer in the database. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77795584 United States 07/07/2019 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |