Trump was demanding justice for the Jeffrey Epstein victims in 2012

What evidence do you speak of? Bidens son and the Ukrainian Govt? Mueller's and Hillary's Uranium One attack on the Oregon farmers for their land so the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) could use it for strip mining? You mean the cover up by destroying all evidence by Arkenciding many of them?

Trump had nothing to hide and did not. Heresay turned in to fact is what he did not want. So again - what evidence did Trump destroy?

Still waiting...

I'm kinda disappointed of the shills on this thread.

Before the election, the shill mills that employed them would keep an archive of fake news articles that the shill employees could link to.

Now they just post un-backed attacks on the "bad orange man", one star the thread and leave.

Do they even collect $3.50 anymore?

Trump's DOJ keeps the original plea deal in tact to protect Trump, Clinton, et al who might or could be named as the co-conspirators.

Jeffrey Epstein's once-secret sex offender plea deal must stand, prosecutors say

New court filing says agreement reached over a decade ago with the wealthy convicted sex offender must not be voided, despite demands from many of his victims.

Thread: Epstein's Plea Deal: All potential co-conspirators that could be named in future given immunity for testimony.


Barr recuses himself for his role in setting up the sweet deal to protect America's and other's politicos




The deal, in which Epstein pleaded guilty to two state charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor, granted him and his potential accomplices immunity from federal charges. In February, the DOJ announced its inquiry into “allegations that Department attorneys may have committed professional misconduct in the manner in which the Epstein criminal matter was resolved.” Also in February, a U.S. district judge ruled that because prosecutors did not inform victims of the plea or provide the opportunity to testify about it, the deal violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

But on June 25, the Department of Justice decided otherwise: Federal prosecutors announced they would not void Epstein’s non-prosecution deal. The next day, however, a federal appeals court in New York ordered the unsealing of almost 2,000 pages of records regarding a 2015 defamation case against Epstein.

[link to nymag.com]

“Epstein was barred from President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., ‘because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club, according to court documents,’” The Washington Post reported.

“I learned through a source that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago [Mar-A- Lago] Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Fort Lauderdale lawyer Bradley Edwards’ said.

[link to thefederalistpapers.org (secure)]

Less than 50%

Someone in my family watches abc news, though i have been trying to tell them that that and all other m$m lie their arses off.

Abc news NEVER mentioned that Trump had Epstein banned from Mar Lago. They instead showed a bad picture of the president & a quote of his saying that "Epstein likes beautiful women on the younger side," trying to implicate/disparage our president.

When are people going to open their eyes???

Horse shit and disinfo. Articles say NOTHING about Trump as a co conspirator.

You lying shit eating motherfucking disinfo troll.

Fuck you, biothch. Just wast 10 minutes of my life on your useless fucking lies.

Yep, that is 77798856.

Zero Credibility, extreme TDS.

“Epstein was barred from President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., ‘because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club, according to court documents,’” The Washington Post reported.

“I learned through a source that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago [Mar-A- Lago] Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Fort Lauderdale lawyer Bradley Edwards’ said.

[link to thefederalistpapers.org (secure)]

Less than 50%

DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that.

Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves.

Mueller was FBI director from September 2001 to September 2013.

To be fair about Trumps tweet back in 2012 he doesn't mention Epstein.

"Got to do something about these missing chidlren grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents--fast trial, death penalty."

This could be in regards to runaways that go missing or children who are abducted like many native americans are in Canada - who may or may not become sex slave workers.

In The Miami Herald's reporting they identified about 80 victims of Epstein and were able to locate 60 of them.

.