Tommy Robinson arrives for sentencing - Livestream from The Old Bailey

Right.. How many are at risk cause of people like you who like to silence the truth.

I wouldn't be surprised if you are pro immigration to.

Oh bless your naivety, this has ZERO to do with religion or ethnicity, our judicial system is the best in the world as is well documented globally.

We don’t care WHO child abusers are, we simply want ANYONE guilty of it to suffer the full weight of the judiciary.

By Stephen’s actions AGAIN, these peadophiles COULD have WALKED FREE because of his actions & HE KNEW THAT.

We have these laws so the guilty DO GET TIME & don’t walk free on technicalities like “the jury have been prejudiced”.

You don’t know the legal system.

I was just in the UK. No the UK is not 'beautiful' in any sense whatsoever.

Hey look, your ignorance is not your fault but you simply don’t understand Sir/Madam.

Actually I have pressed for ‘controlled Immigration’ with the focus being aimed toward ‘genuine asylum’ as opposed to ‘mass immigration’.

We can’t close our doors to those ‘genuinely’ at risk from tyrannical dictatorship’s but need to be mindful of our social support being available to ‘all better life’ seekers.

There is a vast difference but I can explain it better in one word that you may or may not grasp........ ‘Decency’.

He won’t get a prison term I assure you.

Most likely a ‘suspended sentence’ & a fine for his absolute stupidity.

Look, this latest sentencing (& he is used to the inside of as cell as you will see below on his rap sheet), this is nothing to do with historic & repetitive racism & bigotry.

Rap sheet:

[link to www.the-round.co.uk (secure)]

This is very simple;

Stephen Yaxley Lennon (Tommy Robinson) was very aware & professionally adept with regard to legislation regarding legal proceedings as it is practically his job notwithstanding he has been imprisoned for the same before ‘see rap sheet’.

We had ‘multiple trials’ occurring at the same time here in the UK regarding a large number of individuals all believed to be part of the same ‘child grooming gang’.

EVERYONE was made VERY aware on MULTIPLE occasions that it is a crime to film defendants, jury, or anything to do with the cases & publish the information as this WOULD jeopardise the ENTIRE case & all defendants could WALK FREE.

Yet Stephen Yaxley (Tommy Robinson) KNOWINGLY turned up outside the court with his supporters LIVE-STREAMING TO FACEBOOK the defendants leaving the court DURING THE TRIAL.

So...............

Why did he intentionally do this KNOWING FULL WELL it could result in the entire case being thrown out of court & the child groomers walking free?

Sounds odd to me but take a look at the above rap sheet as there is a lot of talk of his OWN SUPPORTERS accusing him of being a double agent, I don’t know, you decide but if you research OBJECTIVELY then the whole thing looks seriously dodgy.

As a person with some practical experience in law, I would have to say, you are talking bollocks!

The state is never far away from the most routine court administrations and there is no doubt, the UK judicial system stands alone as one of the most skewed, corrupted systems anywhere in the civilised world.

Various teams of barristers have asked for and fought for a fairer, more transparent system, but to no avail. Trangressions of procedure and lawfullness are a daily part of court life which is represented in every town and city.

I enjoyed your comments though, very funny tub-thumping!

[link to www.theguardian.com (secure)]

Hey look, your ignorance is not your fault but you simply don’t understand Sir/Madam.

Actually I have pressed for ‘controlled Immigration’ with the focus being aimed toward ‘genuine asylum’ as opposed to ‘mass immigration’.

We can’t close our doors to those ‘genuinely’ at risk from tyrannical dictatorship’s but need to be mindful of our social support being available to ‘all better life’ seekers.

There is a vast difference but I can explain it better in one word that you may or may not grasp........ ‘Decency’.

As a person with some practical experience in law, I would have to say, you are talking bollocks!

The state is never far away from the most routine court administrations and there is no doubt, the UK judicial system stands alone as one of the most skewed, corrupted systems anywhere in the civilised world.

Various teams of barristers have asked for and fought for a fairer, more transparent system, but to no avail. Trangressions of procedure and lawfullness are a daily part of court life which is represented in every town and city.

I enjoyed your comments though, very funny tub-thumping!

[link to www.theguardian.com (secure)]

Oh dear,

All was going reasonably well until the Guardian link. Pyrrhic Victory there.

For all your bluster you didn’t address the point at hand of which you were yourself asking me to address.

I gave you the answer of which you can not refute if indeed you are well versed in this area.

If you wish to lay some credibility & validity to your opinion may I suggest you do in fact address it or lower your head & slowly back away.

You are giving a one sided ‘subjective’ & biased opinion on a subject you profess to know to some degree, so which responsibilities are you abdicating?

Oh dear,

All was going reasonably well until the Guardian link. Pyrrhic Victory there.

For all your bluster you didn’t address the point at hand of which you were yourself asking me to address.

I gave you the answer of which you can not refute if indeed you are well versed in this area.

If you wish to lay some credibility & validity to your opinion may I suggest you do in fact address it or lower your head & slowly back away.

You are giving a one sided ‘subjective’ & biased opinion on a subject you profess to know to some degree, so which responsibilities are you abdicating?

Stop making excuses for pedos we all know why they have these restrictions on muslim only pedo cases because they don't want the public knowing how bad it is.

Rember Michael Levell, Rolf Harris no restrictions then. people like you are scum.

ayr phorce yuan,

Do you think they started the trials one after the other in different parts of the country to cut down on the overall reporting on it, or is it just some sort of coincidence?

The reason for the reporting restrictions was other trials going on elsewhere, how convenient to avoid daily reportings in the mainstream media. None of whom ever show up for these trials.

Hi,

You ask a straight reasonable question so deserve a straight answer keeping to salient facts.

I don’t know much about the ‘child grooming’ case in question but I can tell you this. I believe it was a ‘large’ number of individuals.

Because of the nature of social media & the opportunity of ‘influence over the internet’ it has become common for supporters of criminals & those on trial to actively attempt to exploit a loophole of ‘influencing the jury’ by publicising footage & information ‘still open to the prosecution & defence’ so the judge in many cases has to declare a ‘mistrial’ then the bastards walk free.

This is why it’s becoming more common ‘not’ to publicise details of cases, their times & locations.

It’s nothing to do with ‘conspiracy’ but instead all to do with letting the legal process run its course ‘without’ those on trial or their supporters trying to cause a mistrial.

It seems very likely these ethnic asian defendants were going to be found guilty (or have been found guilty since?) and that would have killed Tommy's narrative that British Gov turn a blind eye to crimes of non-native Brits. So Tommy had to try and collapse the trial or he would face increasing irrelevancy.

Now he tries to portray himself as the victim of an "oppressive British state", which is nonsense because he deliberately broke the law with regard to ongoing trials knowing full what would happen to him.


He did the same thing in another trial months earlier:

How Tommy Robinson’s latest legal strife started in Canterbury

[link to www.canterburyjournal.co.uk (secure)]

You are displaying symptoms of somebody who has their head firmly wedged up their ass. All I said is quite correct and only a legal sychophant, who plays the legal game, could think otherwise.

So whay, you are a 'player', enjoy your little ride, but to all and sundry, you are just another peripheral reef nibbling inhabitant and that's all.

UK judiciary is very corrupt, it is a fact and you find that difficult to deal with. I do not understand you unique vision.

Read the post you are quoting, it’s updated, but you were so keen to regurgitate the same old nonsense you missed it.

My post answers ALL of which you are referring to in your initial response, or should I say ‘distraction’.

That’s an assumption actually so I retract it. I will put it down to your lack of knowledge in the subject area, unless I am substantially corrected by citation.

This was the addition to the post so there can be no communicative errors. I was posting this in reply to a question but answered in a rather rudimentary fashion so as to maintain as much clarity as possible. Maybe you will find it easier to ‘address’.

You ask a straight reasonable question so deserve a straight answer keeping to salient facts.

I don’t know much about the ‘child grooming’ case in question but I can tell you this. I believe it was a ‘large’ number of individuals.

Because of the nature of social media & the opportunity of ‘influence over the internet’ it has become common for supporters of criminals & those on trial to actively attempt to exploit a loophole of ‘influencing the jury’ by publicising footage & information ‘still open to the prosecution & defence’ so the judge in many cases has to declare a ‘mistrial’ then the bastards walk free.

This is why it’s becoming more common ‘not’ to publicise details of cases, their times & locations.

It’s nothing to do with ‘conspiracy’ but instead all to do with letting the legal process run its course ‘without’ those on trial or their supporters trying to cause a mistrial.

You have problem understanding legal process don't you sweetie?

Looking at the crowd, tears come to my eyes

This here is exactly what this is about. Stephen (aka Tommy) knew very well that the only chance he had of justifying his own existence was to facilitate the collapse of trials through clandestine measures.