Meghan Markle doesn't know how to hold her baby Archie

But I had noticed how she was holding him, kinda awkward....but maybe the camera shot was bad...

she couldnt of been holding him like that all day...I would have asked to hold the baby for her...I am sure she has been caring for him...but yes the holding was odd

she looks like she spray tans also

i bet she is whiter than that..

she does look high maintenance....and I know shes got curly hair so to maintain that is hard unless its a wig and most probably extensions, I just think a lot of things about them is inflated by the media

100%

Its not her baby!!

I've been following the spectacle since last October when she trotted out at a fashion show and upstaged the presenter Gone Girl actress forget her name in a six month sized "bump" about 3 weeks after announcing she was pregnant and proceeded to wear a big size then a little size and a falling out the bottom of her dress size and a side-ways one and one she accidentally put on upside down once.

Point being, she faked the pregnancy and went a month over due for some reason. Surrogate issues one would think. Then instead of having a overly large 4 week overdue baby she has this tiny little 7lb 3 oz announced but with no doctors verifying anything about the keystone kops delivery done to the tune of "Yakkety Sax" it was so preposterous at every turn.

It was noted when the baby was posed before a camera that it was a RealBorn Doll named "Darren". Then a few sketchy photos later you see her haphazardly hauling this around in a small area within sight of her paid papparazzi. No one approached them the whole time to see the baby or talk to her except Harry and he was rude because well, she wasn't even supposed to be there and it showed. No stroller, no bottle, no crying, stiff and dangling while held fast to her phoney boobs by it's noggin in a death grip.

I strongly suspect this too is a deluxe overly large model of the RealBorn Doll #3 she's used. There is no way she would go to this polo match with Harry against Will, and perfect Kate and Kids present, uninvited and risk the "baby" crying or spitting up on her haute couture, and causing a scene that she had no clue how to soothe a baby. She has no diaper bag. No bottle, hat for baby's lily white bald head. No sling, no carrier of any kind. She had a fake $300,000 baby shower for a person having a girl. It's quite bizarre.

Her mother was supposedly there a couple days prior for an alleged christening except the Archbishop was out of town, go figure,
But, where was she, just a pop over from LA for a photo op and no hanging around? No reason to take a huge baby you are passing off as two months old to this event you weren't even invited to when she is allegedly on maternity leave.

It's a very odd situation as I detailed in a previous post.

She’s light skin her self! You must not know anything about genetics

Nope, she was at Wimbledon making an ass of herself just a couple days ago and no she did not appear to be 8 months pregnant in a muumuu then. That's what she did the whole time she was trying to pretend to be pregnant.
She is a terrible actress. She wears no prothetic bump for this event and then the next event she shows up like she is due to deliver an Irish Twin any day now.

She is just really stupid but she thinks YOU are and will be fooled by her "clever tactics".

Yes she bears a strong resemblance to MM but none at all to either Samantha or her husband. A lady who MM worked for a time who set up celebrity/charity banquets and events said she had at least one if not two children before she met Harry. She spoke like someone who knows. I think Sam is getting a lot of hush money now that she said she was planning to write a tell all. The book got shelved and I bet Sam got better child support for Noelle from MM.

Totally agree and made some of these same observations.

You saw the lady in the brown velvet gown outside Winchester Cathedral at Commonwealth Day that is obviously the same supposed pregnancy due time like she's the real mother. But, I don't see this as a real child. It doesn't have that "living being" look to it in pics. After the falderol surrounding the christening, the KP blotter which should have been BuckPal, said the infant (private citizen), was baptized Archie Harrison.

Well maybe so. It should have been Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor but that Surname was left off. It seems the baby fake or real is Archie Harrison, commoner.

I suspected as soon as I saw that sepia pic for "Father's Day that it was a photo of Harry when he was a baby, Just a gut instict and sort of resemblance.

Then curiously enough, the dailymail posted a photo of Harry when he was a baby and it was a dead ringer for "Archie" in the sepia pic. You know how older pics discolor on the film back then, as a cover to disguise the image is old she posted with that filter.

I think somebody at the Mail thought that sepia pic looked a little TOO MUCH like Harry, too.

Not her kid.