|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Energetic Sites
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Coming Into Existence |
|
Post Content
|
[ link to www.livescience.com (secure)] Why some physicists really think there's a 'mirror universe' hiding in space-time
A series of viral articles claimed that NASA had discovered particles from another parallel universe in which time runs backward. These claims were incorrect. The true story is far more exciting and strange, involving a journey into the Big Bang and out the other side.
In order to understand how The Daily Star arrived at its bizarre, viral claim, it's necessary to understand the claims of two separate papers from 2018.
The first paper, by Latham Boyle, a physicist at The Perimeter Institute in Alberta, Canada, and his colleagues, proposed a mirror universe — a reflection of our universe across time. It was published December 2018 in the journal Physical Review Letters (after an appearance on the arXiv server in March that year).
"I think nobody else understands the full sweep of what they have composed," said John Learned, a University of Hawaii astrophysicist and the co-author of a second paper, which builds on Boyle's theory.
Boyle's work is a kind of expansion pack meant to plug holes in the theory that tells the dominant origin story of the universe: Lambda-Cold Dark Matter &(#923;CDM).
For instance, measurements of expansion don't line up across time, so that measurements made of this expansion based on data from the early universe don’t jive with measurements using data from the modern universe. In addition, ΛCDM can't explain why matter exists at all, since it predicts that matter and antimatter would have formed at equal rates after the Big Bang, and annihilated each other, leaving nothing behind.
Here’s how Boyle’s team sees their theory: Imagine today's universe as a wide, flat circle, sitting on top of yesterday's slightly smaller circle, which sits on top of the yet-smaller circle of the day before that, Boyle said.
Stack up all the circles from today back to the Big Bang, and you'd end up with a cone standing on its point end.How dr Neruda lol Hawkings says: “Scientists cannot talk about human memory because they don’t know how the brain works in detail. Computer memory they do know how it works in the arrow of time for computers is the same as that for humans. If it were not, One can make a killing on the stock exchange by having a computer that would remember tomorrow’s prices. A computer memory is basically a device containing elements that can exist in either of two states. A simple example is an abacus. An abacus works in a similar way to a computer memory. Each bead can be in one of two positions. To change the position of the bead, a certain amount of energy is required.
Before an item is recorded in a computer‘s memory, The memory is in a disordered state, with equal probabilities for the two possible states. After the memory interacts with the system to be remembered, it will definitely be in one state or the other, according to the state of the system. So the memory has passed from a disordered state to an ordered state.
As they say for man there is two paths.
In order to make sure that the memory is in the right state, it is necessary to use a certain amount of energy to move the bead or to power the computer for example. “
Quoting: Coming Into Existence Totem pole topic Head Heart Gut Secrets of time looks like arrow but is not if look at bigger picture Neruda likes this lol Manhattan project says plateaus do not exist lol
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
