...
Distance = 123 miles
Observer height = ?
Target height = ?
Refraction index = ?
Please provide these numbers.
Quoting: Hydra It's all in the video, I can't watch the video for you(I have watched it)...what the hell you lazy sack of shit. How the fuck do you expect to know anything if you don't watch or read anything dumb fuck?
Sorry that I don't watch another 20 minutes bullshit video - up to now I have not seen a single video that shows things you should not see at the given distance, taken observer and target height into account as well as atmospheric refraction.
Again:
Distance = 123 miles
Observer height = ?
Target height = ?
Refraction index = ?
And again, you know its bullshit because.... exactly. You're not interested in the truth, your only here to argue.
Of course I'm interested in the truth - I'm just not interested in watching another 20 minutes video that for sure will be exposed as bullshit like the other 50 or so videos flattards have uploaded to YouTube.
All of that which your talking about is is LITERALLY described in the video, I can't give you 20 minutes of details in 10 seconds, which is why you won't learn shit and remain a dumb fuck, that is not my problem but yours.
Quoting: Doctor Manhattan You don't have to give me 20 minutes of details in 10 seconds, you just have to give me two numbers that, as you claim, are in the video.
Again:
Distance = 123 miles
Observer height = ? meters
Target height = ? meters
Refraction index = ? (we can use standard refraction since I assume that the video maker didn't measure it)
And deliberately ignoring my other post?
Tell me the height of Polaris above the north pole.
Explain to me how a German equatorial mount works on a flat earth.
Explain to me why the Jantar Mantar in Jaipur has a linear scale.
:samratyantra:
.
