Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,147 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 855,345
Pageviews Today: 1,519,698Threads Today: 643Posts Today: 11,356
05:26 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge...
Poster Handle Hydra
Post Content
:fesszoom:

Prove that it's not the original photo.

And again: What would be the difference between a cropped and an uncropped photo? Pray tell, loser.
 Quoting: Hydra

Your arguing over nothing, it makes no difference and you know it makes no difference. There is nothing to prove. Again, already showed you how it produces that effect.
 Quoting: Doctor Manhattan

Oh look, Doctor Manhattan is a sock puppet of AC 50592849, or why did he feel the need to answer a post, I directed to AC 50592849?


 Quoting: Doctor Manhattan

No comment on the 20° problem, no comment on the refraction index problem, no comment on the temperature and barometric pressure problem.
It seems, you don't have an answer to the problems.

Again:
It's the same shit as the video with the coin and the camera below the table. Put the camera in the optical path (centre of the Fresnel lens) and repeat the experiment.

Also show the maths that the atmosphere bends the image of the sun more the 20° at sunset by applying the proven refraction index of around 1.0003.

And explain how the sunset times are calculated to the second in advance though atmospheric conditions like temperature or air pressure change on a daily and hourly base.


"And I'm still waiting for your proof that atmospheric refraction don't apply to near infrared light as you claimed some days ago."
 Quoting: Hydra

No one said that at all, all I said was infrared allows us to see further past some layers to get us a CLEARER image
 Quoting: Doctor Manhattan

Oh look, we have a lying piece of shit here:
... Refraction means nothing in the infrared video which is the point i was trying to make. ...
 Quoting: Doctor Manhattan



The proof is on you, linking optical illusions that are EASILY disproved, but backed by Mainstream. We all know how much mainstream lies, so lets just cut the bullshit. If you haven't comprehended fake news and how it works, you're still on level 1.

If it applies or not doesn't matter, that is not the point, the point is, YOU SEE TOO FAR, BECAUSE IT IS FLAT, NOT BECAUSE YOUR VIEW BENDS OVER A CURVE TO SEE OBJECTS BEHIND the horizon. If it applied to infrared, it still wouldn't not matter, because WE SEE THE MOUNTAINS WHEN WE SHOULD NOT be able to. BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT BE THERE ON A CURVE. The point of infrared, like other optics is to go past visual layers of atmosphere or highlight certain objects based on temperature

For others who missed that video its this one.
] [link to youtu.be (secure)] 11m37s
 Quoting: Doctor Manhattan

I already proved your bullshit video wrong:
As expected: bullshit video #51

Distance = 123 miles
Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu)
Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto)

Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible.

The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings.
[link to www.metabunk.org (secure)]

Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity?
 Quoting: Hydra

The drop in the refraction index in the visible range of light is just 0.01 per mille: 1.000299 at 400 nm and 1.000291 at 800 nm. [link to aty.sdsu.edu (secure)]
If you claim that the drop is significant higher in the near infrared range, you have to provide evidence for your claim.

Btw.: The camera was not at ground level but at 60 meters (197 feet), a big difference in what you see and what you don't see.

And again: If you claim that refraction does not apply in the near infrared range, you have to provide evidence for your claim.

We see exactly what we should see given the distance, the observer height and the target height, regardless of visible light or near infrared.
 Quoting: Hydra

Only if atmospheric refraction is not taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible.

Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible.

And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] (I hope you can convert meters into feet.)
 Quoting: Hydra



Where is the mirage in the video below?
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Hydra

It's right here, [link to i.imgur.com (secure)] , but you will see a curve, because you want to and are easily fooled by optical illusions, as shown in the video right above. Linking more mirages and .."explain this one"...and "this one" doesn't matter. It's a mirage, the videos explains clearly what mirages are and how they behave.

[link to youtu.be (secure)] 52m57s
 Quoting: Doctor Manhattan

So this below is the mirage from your video above at 52:57

:femirage1:

And this is the "mirage" from my video (00:54).

:femirage2:

Yep, the second image with the bribge is really a super-mirage. //sarc - Did you insert the three lines in your image to obfuscate that there is no mirage?

The curve is right there in the image above, but you will see a mirage, because you want to and are easily fooled by RubeTube videos, as shown right in the videos you posted.

You should join the tards who see men, reptiles or rodents in moon and mars images. You would be an enrichment for these tards with your imagination.


.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP