Charlatan,
I will not allow you to equate 2-Spheres with 3-Balls (i.e. 2 dimension geometry of surface and 3D geometry of solid bodies) just because you have been conditioned with globes and bought into the incessant lies about "Outer Space"
2-Spheres and 3-Balls geometry share certain equations and theorems making discernment difficult and confusing (using maths).
Surfaces and volumes are very different things and should never be equated in mathematical reasoning or compared to each other.
A 2-Sphere cannot contain any water, being itself only a surface. Apparently the 3-Ball has large bodies of water taking the shape of its exterior (held together by nonsensical fictional forces).
All this is contrary to repeatable, observable, constant and uniform laws of nature.
Quoting: BTBIC 6660082 Henhouse dweller,
spouting a lot of nonsensical pseudo-scientific bla-bla doesn't let you look intelligent - quite the opposite.
Water always takes the shape of its container. This is an obvious fact and for you to refute this is absurd to common reasoning.
Quoting: BTBIC 6660082 Because you say so?
Sorry, but I don't believe a psychotic henhouse dweller who can't prove any of his claims.
Prove this isn't happening.
Quoting: BTBIC 6660082 I don't have to prove anything.
It was you who claimed that water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity.
Prove it. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science.
Gas Pressure:- do you know what pressure is? Genuine question; because your logic when faced with the obvious statement that gas pressure must have a container you seem to invoke all kinds of illogical assumptions and weird notions to back up an idea you have no demonstrable backing for.
Quoting: BTBIC 6660082 And what's your point (besides the repeat of your claim that there is a container around Earth)?
Still no poof of your claim that there is a container around earth.
Again. prove it. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science.
.
