Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,143 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 891,895
Pageviews Today: 1,589,803Threads Today: 676Posts Today: 11,988
06:10 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77857992
United States
08/07/2019 10:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
These fuckers are SO high...

o)<

mike
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76831239
United States
08/07/2019 10:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
It means they calculated the age of the Universe wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63928440


Maybe... maybe not...

spock
 Quoting: AkashicRecord®


Of course it’s wrong....time is relative to speed and the speed has been increasing since the beginning....we have no clue....it’s some of the most speculative shit in science.....it doesn’t even deserve to be called science since it’s so speculative and has changed so much....we now even know that the speed of light has changed over time, but you won’t be getting that information in science class....it’s all bullshit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76831239
United States
08/07/2019 10:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Lol. Fools professing themselves as wise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77842514


hesright
BBQ BOY™

User ID: 77857043
United States
08/07/2019 11:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
stupidone2
"Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others."

Everyone has to work out their own salvation.

Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76859562
United States
08/07/2019 11:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
The Big Bang theory has been thrown into question after scientists discovered a star which appears to be older than the Universe itself – and it could lead to a “scientific crisis”.

A star know as [the] “Methuselah star”, or scientifically called HD 140283, is situated about 200 million lightyears away and has stumped experts.

Analysis of the star showed that it contained very little iron content, which would suggest that it formed during a period when the iron element was not abundant in the Universe.

This in turn led to the discovery the star is 14.5 billion years old, some 0.7 billion years older than the Universe.


[link to www.express.co.uk (secure)]
 Quoting: AkashicRecord®


This simply proves that they do not know squat. It always cracks me up when they pretend to know everything.
Jeff_43

User ID: 77887591
United States
08/07/2019 11:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
how did Sheldon cooper take the news
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48735537
United States
08/08/2019 01:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Lol. Fools professing themselves as wise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77842514


Gotta love it
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 56739122
Canada
08/08/2019 01:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Idol1bumpstoner
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35947311
New Zealand
08/08/2019 02:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
How in the living fuck do you check the iron levels of a star 200 million light years away.

But more importantly, Why?
_M_

User ID: 77840626
Australia
08/08/2019 02:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
how did Sheldon cooper take the news
 Quoting: Jeff_43


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
#444
bill L
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77812679
New Zealand
08/08/2019 02:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
The Big Bang theory has been thrown into question after scientists discovered a star which appears to be older than the Universe itself – and it could lead to a “scientific crisis”.

A star know as [the] “Methuselah star”, or scientifically called HD 140283, is situated about 200 million lightyears away and has stumped experts.

Analysis of the star showed that it contained very little iron content, which would suggest that it formed during a period when the iron element was not abundant in the Universe.

This in turn led to the discovery the star is 14.5 billion years old, some 0.7 billion years older than the Universe.


[link to www.express.co.uk (secure)]
 Quoting: AkashicRecord®


funny no one really knows how old the universe actually is, light from older parts may still be streaming towards us. so much older systems may still be unseen.
the big bang is just the most popular and easiest to deal with.

no one knows
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77116473
United States
08/08/2019 02:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
I have a betta in a globular bowl

heavily planted

I wonder if he thinks he lives in a huge lake as he can't see the other side no matter where he is

what say you ponderers of the multiverse?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77812679
New Zealand
08/08/2019 03:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
I have a betta in a globular bowl

heavily planted

I wonder if he thinks he lives in a huge lake as he can't see the other side no matter where he is

what say you ponderers of the multiverse?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77116473


wats a betta?

globular? ie a sphere?
Ricky MModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 71504938
United States
08/08/2019 03:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
stupidone2
 Quoting: BBQ BOY™


chuckle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 44478746
South Africa
08/08/2019 03:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
"Experts"

epiclol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 44478746
South Africa
08/08/2019 03:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
:stupidone2:
 Quoting: BBQ BOY™


:bigcruise:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70284508
United States
08/08/2019 03:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Do You have a link that's not SPAM ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76725771
United States
08/08/2019 04:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
How many assumptions they use are wrong?

What if the universe is only 6 months old (yet has a 20 billion year history) - how would we know?
 Quoting: JADR+


Well, I just went to the Ark Encounter Exhibit and they said the universe is only 6 thousand years old ... and someone with an Ark wouldn't lie.


propoganda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73158164
United States
08/08/2019 04:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Who de fuck made up that article. It is so full of bullshit.

For instance: A star continuously operates a fusion reaction. It progressively fuses atoms into heavier and heavier element until it fuses Iron. To fuse Iron into heavier elements, It requires more energy than a star can produce with gravity alone.

All stars end up with Iron as their core and a burned out star is mostly Iron.

Heavier elements than Iron are created in novas and supernovas, where the energy is concentrated so heavily that it fuses elements heavier than Iron.

A star with little to no Iron? That would be a NEW star. Not a gazillion year old geriatric.

That article is pure fiction.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76996527
United States
08/08/2019 04:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
The Big Bang theory has been thrown into question after scientists discovered a star which appears to be older than the Universe itself – and it could lead to a “scientific crisis”.

A star know as [the] “Methuselah star”, or scientifically called HD 140283, is situated about 200 million lightyears away and has stumped experts.

Analysis of the star showed that it contained very little iron content, which would suggest that it formed during a period when the iron element was not abundant in the Universe.

This in turn led to the discovery the star is 14.5 billion years old, some 0.7 billion years older than the Universe.


[link to www.express.co.uk (secure)]
 Quoting: AkashicRecord®


There is no telling how large the universe is because we're limited by how long it takes for light to travel to us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76182010
Sweden
08/08/2019 04:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Vatican't
the jesuits invented this Big Bang bullshit

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77744278
United States
08/08/2019 04:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
All the article really says is that the calculation for the big bang may be off, not that it didn't happen.
 Quoting: Kpduties 75530758



Look they have No idea what x
Created the universe..they will always krep revising it because they dony know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77744278
United States
08/08/2019 04:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Who de fuck made up that article. It is so full of bullshit.

For instance: A star continuously operates a fusion reaction. It progressively fuses atoms into heavier and heavier element until it fuses Iron. To fuse Iron into heavier elements, It requires more energy than a star can produce with gravity alone.

All stars end up with Iron as their core and a burned out star is mostly Iron.

Heavier elements than Iron are created in novas and supernovas, where the energy is concentrated so heavily that it fuses elements heavier than Iron.

A star with little to no Iron? That would be a NEW star. Not a gazillion year old geriatric.

That article is pure fiction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73158164





No. When you gaze through space you are looking back in time because the speed it takes light to travel. The star without iron is gone in real time
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77819033
Canada
08/08/2019 04:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
5 stars to you for the post.

But I don't need a star to be discovered to know that the big bang theory is the biggest lie on the planet.

Only morons - darwin worshipers part of the cult of darwinism believe in that garbage.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77644216
France
08/08/2019 05:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
But but Bill Nye.
 Quoting: jack crow


Pedo Nye ?
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 77047820
Netherlands
08/08/2019 05:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
The Big Bang theory has been thrown into question after scientists discovered a star which appears to be older than the Universe itself – and it could lead to a “scientific crisis”.

A star know as [the] “Methuselah star”, or scientifically called HD 140283, is situated about 200 million lightyears away and has stumped experts.

Analysis of the star showed that it contained very little iron content, which would suggest that it formed during a period when the iron element was not abundant in the Universe.

This in turn led to the discovery the star is 14.5 billion years old, some 0.7 billion years older than the Universe.


[link to www.express.co.uk (secure)]
 Quoting: AkashicRecord®


Cool thumbs



I think .7 billion is well within the margin of error on massive time "measurements" / speculation like this.
AkashicRecord®  (OP)

User ID: 50330480
United States
08/08/2019 05:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
How in the living fuck do you check the iron levels of a star 200 million light years away.

But more importantly, Why?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35947311


Spectral lines, baby!
Sorry, that message is no longer in the database.
AkashicRecord®  (OP)

User ID: 50330480
United States
08/08/2019 07:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Who de fuck made up that article. It is so full of bullshit.

For instance: A star continuously operates a fusion reaction. It progressively fuses atoms into heavier and heavier element until it fuses Iron. To fuse Iron into heavier elements, It requires more energy than a star can produce with gravity alone.

All stars end up with Iron as their core and a burned out star is mostly Iron.

Heavier elements than Iron are created in novas and supernovas, where the energy is concentrated so heavily that it fuses elements heavier than Iron.

A star with little to no Iron? That would be a NEW star. Not a gazillion year old geriatric.

That article is pure fiction.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73158164


Also, certain elements, like "strange" isotopes of xenon are only produced by supernovae by way of rapid neutron capture... Guess what? Those isotopes of xenon were found in Jupiter's atmosphere. We sent a probe to sample the atmosphere, but the results were hidden or covered-up and were never available to scientists. That means that our Sun previously went supernova...

Galileo-mse
Sorry, that message is no longer in the database.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72937503
United States
08/08/2019 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Who are you that are so wise in the ways of science?
AkashicRecord®  (OP)

User ID: 50330480
United States
08/08/2019 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’
Who are you that are so wise in the ways of science?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72937503


You probably wouldn't be able to understand if I could even properly tell you... In other words, it's complicated?

1dunno1
Sorry, that message is no longer in the database.





GLP