| Users Online Now: 2,434 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,818,160 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,517,386 | Threads Today: 618 | Posts Today: 11,668 |
| 07:25 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,434 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,818,160 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,517,386 | Threads Today: 618 | Posts Today: 11,668 |
| 07:25 PM | ||
Appologate: The Greatest Conspiratorial Fraud Ever Committed by the U.S. Federal Government | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77332576  United States08/10/2019 07:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77851039  Spain08/10/2019 07:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lou Czar
 User ID: 77585373 United States08/10/2019 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is certainly worth examining the evidence and bringing new tools to the analysis. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77758415 The amount of dots that converge in the Nasa mic matrix is staggering and fodder for much conspiracy speculation. Operation paperclip to Kubrick's alleged involvement, 2001 A space odyssey on up to the 2001 wtc psyop and terror incident that was oddly enough committed in the shadow of an obelisk inspired hilton hotel. So many noxious threads with the various wars against humanity internationally and domestically, some of the connecting fibers get lost in the staggering scope of the con. Been analyzing these issues for several decades and been a long time visitor to this site for the chance it offers some hope for like minds to share the curiosity and passion to discover and correct past mistakes and work toward truth and reconciliation. Wow, I'm ultra impressed by your intelligent response. Good luck getting much attention for actual research here, they're much more interesting in fussing and name calling. But hopefully I'll encounter some more of your thoughts, they're a breath of fresh air! Yeah please start a thread I am a meat popsicle. And the Devil's Uncle. *Mostly* Harmless. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59081091  Canada08/10/2019 07:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77777748 United States08/10/2019 07:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Scribbler
User ID: 76691630 United States08/10/2019 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Doctor Manhattan
User ID: 77435031 United States08/10/2019 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You dumb ass. At least spell it right. Nobody is going to take you seriously when the first word in your title is spelled wrong. You couldn’t even get three correct letters down before totally fucking up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77777748 It doesn't change a thing of what he stalking about, move along retard. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75894792 United States08/10/2019 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77543928 United States08/10/2019 08:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it a scandal? Let's say we did fake it. It was done to show up the commies, who were very embarrassed that we pulled it off but they could not. Shit, faking a moon landing is just about as impressive as an actual moon landing. I don't get why you're so butthurt about it, even if you truly think it was faked. If it was impossible to land on the moon in 1969 so we tricked the entire world into believing we did, that's the most gansta shit ever.  |
| Doctor Manhattan
User ID: 77435031 United States08/10/2019 08:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it a scandal? Let's say we did fake it. It was done to show up the commies, who were very embarrassed that we pulled it off but they could not. Quoting: R. Wordsworth Shit, faking a moon landing is just about as impressive as an actual moon landing. I don't get why you're so butthurt about it, even if you truly think it was faked. If it was impossible to land on the moon in 1969 so we tricked the entire world into believing we did, that's the most gansta shit ever. the deception is talked about in the bible...we're not on a globe, they lead the population to science/evolution to derail humanity from God. CO Founder of NASA has the Bible quote on his tombstone. The motive is there, but its inconceivable to most people that its possible to do. |
| BilloutWest
User ID: 77408960 United States08/10/2019 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If the United States had been faking the Moon landings, one group would not have been in on the conspiracy: The Soviets. The Soviet Union would have revealed any fraud in the blink of an eye, and not just without hesitation, but with joy and satisfaction. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 59081091 Canada08/10/2019 08:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You dumb ass. At least spell it right. Nobody is going to take you seriously when the first word in your title is spelled wrong. You couldn’t even get three correct letters down before totally fucking up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77777748 It doesn't change a thing of what he stalking about, move along retard. Another fine example of a failed education system. |
| Doctor Manhattan
User ID: 77435031 United States08/10/2019 08:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it a scandal? Let's say we did fake it. It was done to show up the commies, who were very embarrassed that we pulled it off but they could not. Quoting: R. Wordsworth Shit, faking a moon landing is just about as impressive as an actual moon landing. I don't get why you're so butthurt about it, even if you truly think it was faked. If it was impossible to land on the moon in 1969 so we tricked the entire world into believing we did, that's the most gansta shit ever. the deception is talked about in the bible...we're not on a globe, they lead the population to science/evolution to derail humanity from God. CO Founder of NASA has the Bible quote on his tombstone. The motive is there, but its inconceivable to most people that its possible to do. See to far, objects that should be behind the horizon due to the curve, but its there when you zoom in. thats impossible but other's (everyone) will find some form a excuse to not say its true. Thats the end of the rabbit hole, to find God. Flat plane = firmament, described in the bible. You wanted the reason, do you see it? Like most conspiracies we started out as it sounded too absurd (jfk, vaccines, pharmaceuticals, gmos, 9/11)...as you go through the layers of deception you get to NASA, the top of the pyramid thats holds the veil over everyone, but it sounds unreal if you haven't comprehended the deceptions of other conspiracies. They want to control your mind to make you believe your nothing, so you will believe anything. |
| Hawkshot
User ID: 76631897  United Kingdom08/10/2019 08:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77376498 United States08/10/2019 08:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No stars" So you don't know shit(one) about photography OPIE. Tell me Hoaxtard: What is the proper photographic exposure on the moon? I know... You wanna; know why I know? Because the moon is lit by the same sun that lights the earth. A broad daylinght exposure follows the "Sunny sixteen" rule". A proper exposure in broad daylight is an aperturesetting of F16 ;with a shutter speed of 1/ (the film "A.S.A"):or today 1/("ISo"setting). So F16 at 1/400 for 400 speed film. At that setting there is not enough starlight captured to register on the film.And the sky of course appears jet black. Cram your moon hoax.(where the stars don'tshine) Just saying" the technology was insufficient" doesn't prersent any facts. You're just making shit up. Show us your math. |
| Doctor Manhattan
User ID: 77435031 United States08/10/2019 08:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You dumb ass. At least spell it right. Nobody is going to take you seriously when the first word in your title is spelled wrong. You couldn’t even get three correct letters down before totally fucking up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77777748 It doesn't change a thing of what he stalking about, move along retard. Another fine example of a failed education system. Explain how a typo invalidates anything else hes said, that is provable. Go ahead, enlighten us with your higher education. Show us a fine example. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74934798 United States08/10/2019 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I watched it in 69 and thought it was fake then, there is no way we could visit the moon on simple transistors and primitive computers. Its scary that so many people believe anything they are fed. It would be an amazing feat today involving Cray supercomputers and advanced propulsion / life support systems. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77905095  Russia08/10/2019 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If the United States had been faking the Moon landings, one group would not have been in on the conspiracy: The Soviets. The Soviet Union would have revealed any fraud in the blink of an eye, and not just without hesitation, but with joy and satisfaction. Why would they 'reveal' the fraud when they were milking their own populations money with delusions of advancing space/moon travel? EVERY country has a 'space' program (Read: black ops), that can suck up untold amounts of money under the guise of 'science'. It's really the perfect cover for stealing money and putting into black-ops, then tell morons it was used for 'space travel'. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77905095 Russia08/10/2019 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No stars" Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77376498 So you don't know shit(one) about photography OPIE. Tell me Hoaxtard: What is the proper photographic exposure on the moon? I know... You wanna; know why I know? Because the moon is lit by the same sun that lights the earth. A broad daylinght exposure follows the "Sunny sixteen" rule". A proper exposure in broad daylight is an aperturesetting of F16 ;with a shutter speed of 1/ (the film "A.S.A"):or today 1/("ISo"setting). So F16 at 1/400 for 400 speed film. At that setting there is not enough starlight captured to register on the film.And the sky of course appears jet black. Cram your moon hoax.(where the stars don'tshine) Just saying" the technology was insufficient" doesn't prersent any facts. You're just making shit up. Show us your math. Lol yea sure, but they 'lost the technology' to go back. How stupid do you have to be to believe that. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44883436 United States08/10/2019 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could go to the moon in the 60's with the technology of that time, then logic would dictate that we'd be able to go now again at a third of the cost and with much greater ease yet we have not returned to the moon since. This is what causes me to question that we ever really made it to the moon. Especially if there are mineral resources there we could extract....because if that were true, we'd have gone back by now to lay claim to it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46987434 United States08/10/2019 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We absolutely, 100%, without question went to the moon. You “moon hoax” douche bags really grind my gears. Get a grip and stop trying to diminish America’s accomplishments. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77732153 no matter what happened YOU didnt go to the fucking moon so stop saying "we" you dumbed down cretin. thats how they got you |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46987434 United States08/10/2019 08:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | when Collins who was on the dark side of he moon half the time orbiting in the command module said he didnt see stars in that infamous interview,I knew they were all lying. the sight would have been BREATHTAKING |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77376498 United States08/10/2019 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could go to the moon in the 60's with the technology of that time, then logic would dictate that we'd be able to go now again at a third of the cost and with much greater ease yet we have not returned to the moon since. This is what causes me to question that we ever really made it to the moon. Especially if there are mineral resources there we could extract....because if that were true, we'd have gone back by now to lay claim to it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44883436 Political will. People got all "Anti-Nasa" as a "cause". "Why go out there when there's kids hungry here". Thank the larval SJW's of the 80's. And then there was the whole Fucktard Obama changing NASA'as mission to include "Muslim outreach". So there was 8 years of wasted energy,time& money. NASA IS A BUREACRACY WITH HUGE CONTRACTS. Turning that tanker ship around is not easy. |
| Pilgrim001
User ID: 77021014 United States08/10/2019 09:10 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77905095 Russia08/10/2019 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we could go to the moon in the 60's with the technology of that time, then logic would dictate that we'd be able to go now again at a third of the cost and with much greater ease yet we have not returned to the moon since. This is what causes me to question that we ever really made it to the moon. Especially if there are mineral resources there we could extract....because if that were true, we'd have gone back by now to lay claim to it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44883436 Political will. People got all "Anti-Nasa" as a "cause". "Why go out there when there's kids hungry here". Thank the larval SJW's of the 80's. And then there was the whole Fucktard Obama changing NASA'as mission to include "Muslim outreach". So there was 8 years of wasted energy,time& money. NASA IS A BUREACRACY WITH HUGE CONTRACTS. Turning that tanker ship around is not easy. Except none of that is the 'official' reason. NASA claims they 'lost' the technology. If you believe that I have some prime Swampland real-estate in Florida to sell you. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77902617 United States08/10/2019 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75525718 Canada08/10/2019 09:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75525718 Canada08/10/2019 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| conspiracyfactualist
User ID: 73843701 United States08/10/2019 09:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you lost me here: "The extremely advanced technology necessary to accomplish such a daunting feat was simply not available in America in 1969." Poppycock! The technology we possed obviously exceeds your understanding. possed? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77902617 United States08/10/2019 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Early transistors mounted on printed circuits were switched in and out with a slide or rotary switch. Miniature IF coils or transformers were found by removing the back of the cover section. The ferrite antenna rod serves as the antennea coil, usually these frequency coils are shielded and found in a row in front of with many turns of fine wire, whereas the bandwidth bands may switch in voltage to separate AM and FM short waves, whereas as in band-switching. You can locate each transistor stage to the coils and shielded transformers. The output stages are found near the control leads and can be traced back from the terminals to locate the output. Thnis would not have been allowed to pass the VA BELTS. Case closed. |
