Dr. Robert Epstein: HillaryClinton, whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about me today. HOLD MY BEER!!!

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
3,325 Tweets


Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein
Author of 15 books, researcher at AIBRT, loving #father of five, former editor-in-chief @PsychToday.

To support my research: [link to aibrt.org (secure)]

California [link to drrobertepstein.com (secure)] Joined May 2014

86 Following
25.7K Followers

Last Edited by The Natural One on 08/20/2019 12:19 PM

[link to www.ora.tv]

Dr. Robert Epstein on Whether Google Can Rig the Presidential Election
PoliticKING with Larry KingSep 04 '15

Could the technology behemoth Google actually rig the upcoming presidential election? Larry discusses with distinguished scholar, scientist and award-winning author Dr. Robert Epstein on PoliticKING. Dr. Epstein expands on the conversation here [link to www.ora.tv]

[link to www.ora.tv]

Google’s Hypocrisy

The head of Google Search denies my claim that Google can control elections—well, sort of; if you read closely, you’ll find that he denies nothing.

PoliticKING with Larry King September 04 '15

By Robert Epstein

Google has spoken. Apparently shaken by my recent article in Politico— “How Google Can Rig the 2016 Election” —Google’s head of search, Dr. Amit Singhal, has published a critique—“A Flawed Elections Conspiracy Theory.”I encourage you to read it closely.

I emphasize the word closely. On the surface, Dr. Singhal’s article appears to refute my recent assertions that Google can easily flip close elections by favoring a candidate in its search rankings. If you read closely, however, you will find that Dr. Singhal has denied none of my specific claims. As I discussed recently in my appearance on "PoliticKING” with Larry King, here are the major points I made in my Politico article, not one of which was refuted in Dr. Singhal’s reply, not even in part:
...
...
...

:arkancide:?????

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Trump tweet, point #1: I've never said that #Google deliberately "manipulated" the 2016 election, but I measured substantial pro-#Hillary bias in #Google's search results by preserving & analyzing 13,207 election-related searches & the 98,044 web pages linked to those searches.

3:14 PM · Aug 20, 2019

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Trump tweet, point #2: The level of pro-#Hillary bias I found in #Google's search results - absent on #Bing & #Yahoo - was enough to convince between 2.6 & 10.4 million undecided voters to vote for Hillary. .

@realDonaldTrump said 16 million; that's wrong.

3:19 PM · Aug 20, 2019

Somebody send him this, 300,000 Hillary votes didn't exist upon recount in Detroit.


[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]

[link to twitter.com (secure)]


Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Trump tweet, point #3: It doesn't matter whether the bias in #Google search results was deliberate or not. Once it appeared - which it did at least 6 months before the election - it began shifting opinions & votes without people's knowledge & without leaving a paper trail.

3:22 PM · Aug 20, 2019

Looks like someone wants a different search result when we google "Epstein"

#metoo

yet it was Obama that Turned our white house the colors of the gay pride rainbow and beheaded Christians all over the middle east not Trump, not Kushner... obama

He Also declared the USA is no longer a Christian nation.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



Last Edited by Slowly awakening on 08/20/2019 04:33 PM

Likely he will turn up dead (of natural causes like strangulation or bullet holes) in the next few weeks.

Might as well take out two Epsteins back to back; that way the public will just blend them both together. Two for the price of one.

9 mins ago

Now, switching to .@HillaryClinton: This is going to hurt me to write, because I & my whole extended family have been strong supporters of the Clintons for decades. I have a framed, signed letter from #Bill on the wall near my desk. But #Hillary should be ashamed of herself.

He is probably being arkancided right now

^^^

#Hillary has long depended on #Google for both money & votes.

Her largest donor in 2016 was Alphabet/Google.

Her Chief Technology Officer during the campaign was Stephanie Hannon, a former Google exec.

And then there's #EricSchmidt, longtime head of Google - the guy in the pic:


[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring

[link to hackernoon.com (secure)]

Popular vote amount!

Meds!

No sympathy for this guy. He decided to climb into bed with her(metaphorically of course, because nobody would climb into bed with Hitlery except Webb Hubbell). He deserves everything he gets from her, and then some.

When that angel on your shoulders tells you not to do something, he's not telling you that just because...

he's just getting started

I second that.

I hope somebody screen shots his tweets!

Hopefully he's mad enough to spills some beans.

Isn't it interesting how seemingly unrelated things like this work?

Kudos.

Or nuclear radiation poisoning. It's not like the deep state even gives a fuck anymore about keeping quiet.

That's for sure

He hasn't tweeted in over 40 mins - I might change my opinion once he gives us something thats not already known.