Dr. Robert Epstein: HillaryClinton, whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about me today. HOLD MY BEER!!!

[link to twitter.com (secure)]
Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein
If you want the full story about my 2016 election monitoring project, read my essay, "Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring," published last year:

Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring
hackernoon.com [link to hackernoon.com (secure)]

3:28 PM · Aug 20, 2019

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

A leaked email showed that in 2014 #Google's #EricSchmidt offered to run #Hillary's tech campaign (see pic). In 2015, Schmidt in fact funded The Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office. [link to qz.com (secure)]
Image [link to pbs.twimg.com (secure)]

3:59 PM · Aug 20, 2019
__________________________________

[link to qz.com (secure)]

THE GROUNDWORK

The stealthy, Eric Schmidt-backed startup that’s working to put Hillary Clinton in the White House
By Adam Pasick & Tim FernholzOctober 9, 2015

...
...
“We’re not trying to obfuscate anything, we’re just trying to keep our heads down and do stuff,” says Michael Slaby, who runs the Groundwork. He was the chief technology officer for president Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, a top digital executive for Obama 2012, and the former chief technology strategist for TomorrowVentures, Schmidt’s angel investment fund.

He explained that the Groundwork and its parent company, Chicago-based Timshel—which according to its website is named for a Hebrew word meaning “you may” and is devoted to “helping humanity solve our most difficult social, civic, and humanitarian challenges”—are “all one project, with the same backers,” whom he declined to name.
...
...
...
__________________________

[link to thegroundwork.com (secure)]

Build a Modern Movement

Activate community. Measure impact. Make progress with the platform powering the next generation of social impact websites and apps.

...
...
...
eerie shit...

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

About 96% of 2016 campaign donations from #Google employees went to #Hillary. And #ElanKriegel, Hillary's Chief Analytics Officer, credits his 2012 tech team, informally supervised by #EricSchmidt, for half of Obama's win margin: nearly 2.5 million votes. [link to psmag.com (secure)]
Image [link to pbs.twimg.com (secure)]

4:52 PM · Aug 20, 2019

OBAMA'S NOT-SO-BIG DATA

After the last presidential election, wide-eyed pundits hailed a brave new era of political campaigning, crediting Obama's victory to his team's wizardry with data. The hype was premature. Here's what the story of 2012 really means for the future of politics.

JOHN SIDES & LYNN VAVRECKUPDATED:JUN 14, 2017ORIGINAL:JAN 21, 2014

...
...
..
INNOVATIONS HAVE NOT GONE AS FAR AS THE HYPE SAYS THEY DID. CAN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS USE DATA TO PREDICT EXACTLY HOW WE'LL VOTE? CAN THEY SUBTLY MANIPULATE OUR VOTES? DID DATA CRUNCHING REALLY PUT OBAMA BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
"BIG" DATA AND MICRO-TARGETING

Candidates have always tailored their messages to fit their audience. DeWitt Clinton, who ran against James Madison, made speeches supporting the War of 1812 at campaign stops in the South and West, and others denouncing the war at stops in the Northeast. So targeting is nothing new. What is new is how precisely campaigns can target. Rather than target by geography—region, county, precinct—Republican and Democratic campaigns now routinely target individual voters. Both parties have collected information about every American voter from state voter files and consumer databases.

Deleted - The Natural One Got there before me

Last Edited by feasog on 08/20/2019 05:56 PM

The MSM doesn't even talk about it! For him to lay it out, AGAIN, is the point! It cannot be denied...

Jeffery Epstein was arrested 10 days before Robert Epstein testified to congress. Jeffery Epstein was a horrible person, I have no doubt about that, but could they have chosen to sacrifice him to smear the name Epstein so this guy's testimony wouldn't gain any traction and get rid of a witness at the same time?

very plausible solution.... hmm....

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Hillary: If my work has been "debunked," why was it included in a volume just published by #Oxford U.? Why have I been invited to speak about it at prestigious venues worldwide: #Stanford U., #Yale Law School (where both you & Bill went), even our #Senate (where you served)?
Image [link to pbs.twimg.com (secure)]

5:09 PM · Aug 20, 2019

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Hillary: I know you're in #Google's pocket, but for the sake of our #democracy, I urge you listen to my recent Congressional testimony ( [link to c-span.org (secure)] & to scan the 58 essays & conference papers I list at the end of my written testimony: [link to judiciary.senate.gov (secure)]
Image [link to pbs.twimg.com (secure)]

5:20 PM · Aug 20, 2019

This is actually a very important thread. Thanks, OP

________

One of the links I found reading through the Dr's tweets had a screenshot of a Project Veritas leak that showed godlikeproductions.com on one of Goog's blacklists.

You can see it near the end of the last column of this tweet:
[link to twitter.com (secure)]

The article at the link I went to is especially interesting, regarding goog's retaliation against a former employee, turned whistleblower:

snip:

"...An anonymous account — which Vorhies said he believes belongs to a Google employee — outed him as a "leaker" on Twitter, and then he was approached by law enforcement at his residence in California. San Francisco police received a call from Google which prompted a "wellness check."


"They got inside the gate, the police, and they started banging on my door… And so the police decided that they were going to call in additional forces. They called in the FBI, they called in the SWAT team. And they called in a bomb squad," Vorhies told Project Veritas..."

It goes on to report that back in 2016 Dr. Epstein had already made this finding:

"Epstein claimed to have discovered a few other types of blacklists: the autocomplete blacklist, the Google Maps blacklist, the YouTube blacklist, the Google account blacklist, the Google News blacklist, the Google AdWords and AdSense blacklists, the search engine blacklist, and the quarantine list.

Vorhies told Project Veritas that Google is "intending to sculpt the information landscape."


[link to pjmedia.com (secure)]

Last Edited by esotericMorgan on 08/20/2019 06:23 PM

[link to twitter.com (secure)]
Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Hillary: If you examine my work carefully, you will find that it adheres to the very highest standards of scientific integrity. You will also conclude, I believe, that #Google poses a serious threat to the free-&-fair election & to human autonomy. See

How the internet flips elections and alters our thoughts – Robert Epstein | Aeon Essays
The internet has spawned subtle forms of influence that can flip elections and manipulate everything we say, think and do

aeon.co/essays/how-the-internet-flips-elections-and-alters-ou​r-thoughts
[link to pbs.twimg.com (secure)]

5:41 PM · Aug 20, 2019
_____________________________

The new mind control
The internet has spawned subtle forms of influence that can flip elections and manipulate everything we say, think and do

...
...
...
Packard had uncovered a much bigger problem, however – namely that powerful corporations were constantly looking for, and in many cases already applying, a wide variety of techniques for controlling people without their knowledge. He described a kind of cabal in which marketers worked closely with social scientists to determine, among other things, how to get people to buy things they didn’t need and how to condition young children to be good consumers – inclinations that were explicitly nurtured and trained in Huxley’s Brave New World. Guided by social science, marketers were quickly learning how to play upon people’s insecurities, frailties, unconscious fears, aggressive feelings and sexual desires to alter their thinking, emotions and behaviour without any awareness that they were being manipulated.

By the early 1950s, Packard said, politicians had got the message and were beginning to merchandise themselves using the same subtle forces being used to sell soap. Packard prefaced his chapter on politics with an unsettling quote from the British economist Kenneth Boulding: ‘A world of unseen dictatorship is conceivable, still using the forms of democratic government.’ Could this really happen, and, if so, how would it work?

...
...
But what would happen if new sources of control began to emerge that had little or no competition? And what if new means of control were developed that were far more powerful – and far more invisible – than any that have existed in the past? And what if new types of control allowed a handful of people to exert enormous influence not just over the citizens of the US but over most of the people on Earth?

It might surprise you to hear this, but these things have already happened.
...
...
...
Could Google and ‘those we work with’ (language from the privacy policy) use the information they are amassing about you for nefarious purposes – to manipulate or coerce, for example? Could inaccurate information in people’s profiles (which people have no way to correct) limit their opportunities or ruin their reputations?

Certainly, if Google set about to fix an election, it could first dip into its massive database of personal information to identify just those voters who are undecided. Then it could, day after day, send customised rankings favouring one candidate to just those people. One advantage of this approach is that it would make Google’s manipulation extremely difficult for investigators to detect.

Extreme forms of monitoring, whether by the KGB in the Soviet Union, the Stasi in East Germany, or Big Brother in 1984, are essential elements of all tyrannies, and technology is making both monitoring and the consolidation of surveillance data easier than ever. By 2020, China will have put in place the most ambitious government monitoring system ever created – a single database called the Social Credit System, in which multiple ratings and records for all of its 1.3 billion citizens are recorded for easy access by officials and bureaucrats. At a glance, they will know whether someone has plagiarised schoolwork, was tardy in paying bills, urinated in public, or blogged inappropriately online.
...
...
...
Looking ahead to the November 2016 US presidential election, I see clear signs that Google is backing Hillary Clinton. In April 2015, Clinton hired Stephanie Hannon away from Google to be her chief technology officer and, a few months ago, Eric Schmidt, chairman of the holding company that controls Google, set up a semi-secret company – The Groundwork – for the specific purpose of putting Clinton in office. The formation of The Groundwork prompted Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, to dub Google Clinton’s ‘secret weapon’ in her quest for the US presidency.

We now estimate that Hannon’s old friends have the power to drive between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes to Clinton on election day with no one knowing that this is occurring and without leaving a paper trail. They can also help her win the nomination, of course, by influencing undecided voters during the primaries. Swing voters have always been the key to winning elections, and there has never been a more powerful, efficient or inexpensive way to sway them than SEME.

We are living in a world in which a handful of high-tech companies, sometimes working hand-in-hand with governments, are not only monitoring much of our activity, but are also invisibly controlling more and more of what we think, feel, do and say. The technology that now surrounds us is not just a harmless toy; it has also made possible undetectable and untraceable manipulations of entire populations – manipulations that have no precedent in human history and that are currently well beyond the scope of existing regulations and laws. The new hidden persuaders are bigger, bolder and badder than anything Vance Packard ever envisioned. If we choose to ignore this, we do so at our peril.
_______________________________
less than 50%




Last Edited by The Natural One on 08/20/2019 06:54 PM

Dr Epstein might have saved this country from a deep state take over.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein

#Hillary: #Google poses 3 serious threats to humanity: 1) an obscene level of #surveillance across 200+ platforms, 2) the power to determine what content 2+ billion can or can NOT see (#censorship) ( [link to usnews.com (secure)] & 3) invisible #manipulation on a massive scale.

The New Censorship
How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites?
usnews.com [link to www.usnews.com (secure)]
[link to pbs.twimg.com (secure)]

6:06 PM · Aug 20, 2019

It's Cool of you to do that. Not everyone here does...

Green for you!

Edited to apologize to OP.

This is truly important information and I didn't mean to slide...


Last Edited by NeD RyeRsON on 08/20/2019 07:20 PM

I recall when George Zimmer of Men's Warehouse fame was fired in the hyper tense news cycle with George Zimmerman of Trayvon Martin fame.

these syncs could be metaphysical however; conscious echo's that spill over from the masses.

These J,ews are confusing.

One is a pedophile lord, another is attacking big tech and Hillary.

It's like they are a plurality.

He is tweeting right now...

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Yes, no doubt.

nothing to do with PEDO epstein,

who the clintons also happen to be wrapped around.

How long until we just declare them enemies of the god damn state and take action on their endless crimes?

Last Edited by Rufus Juice on 08/20/2019 07:33 PM

Too many Epstein's around Clinton's lately .....

Looks like someone wants a different search result when we google "Epstein"

YES! Already search results are mostly scrubbed of that Brunel pervert (MC@ model agency)

and Epstein's long time lawyer Indyke, his image has been scrubbed from the net.

Just hoping Dr Epstein stays true to his word and nothing happens to him or his message.

Clintons are sick fucks. period.

I wonder how quickly there would be a knock at the door if you googled something about how to enter the google campus undetected?

How does it shift votes?

This can't end well.