| Users Online Now: 1,430 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 161,229 | |
| Pageviews Today: 299,875 | Threads Today: 150 | Posts Today: 2,306 |
| 03:24 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,430 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 161,229 | |
| Pageviews Today: 299,875 | Threads Today: 150 | Posts Today: 2,306 |
| 03:24 AM | ||
Top NASA Manager Says the 2024 Moon Landing by Astronauts might not Happen | |
| Prudent Nomad
Offer Upgrade  User ID: 77873001  United States09/19/2019 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77256626  Canada09/19/2019 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47752129 Canada09/19/2019 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost like.... The Apollo missions were a big fat Hollywood hoax production? I mean, since they killed Kubrick, err, he died... It sure is tough to 'go back'! Considering NASA could do it in 1969 you would think the Soviet Union or Russia or China or Japan or the European Space Agency would be able to do it 50 years later, no? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78017611  New Zealand09/19/2019 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77674388  Argentina09/19/2019 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77996993 United States09/19/2019 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77674388 Argentina09/19/2019 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77976648 New Zealand09/20/2019 02:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short. Quoting: Prudent Nomad “What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.” The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration. According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues." [link to www.technology.org (secure)] technical issues? to go BACK to the moon? But all those tech issues were sorted with opollo? lol.  |
| Doctor Manhattan
User ID: 77435031 United States09/20/2019 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States09/20/2019 02:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| G3
User ID: 77977754 United States09/20/2019 02:15 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short. Quoting: Prudent Nomad “What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.” The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration. According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues." [link to www.technology.org (secure)] technical issues? to go BACK to the moon? But all those tech issues were sorted with opollo? lol.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74188487 United States09/20/2019 02:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost like.... The Apollo missions were a big fat Hollywood hoax production? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47752129 I mean, since they killed Kubrick, err, he died... It sure is tough to 'go back'! Considering NASA could do it in 1969 you would think the Soviet Union or Russia or China or Japan or the European Space Agency would be able to do it 50 years later, no? How dare you, sir!!! How dare you use logic and reason to cast aspersions on the official story of the Apollo moon(ed) landings. ;) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74188487 United States09/20/2019 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It must never cease to amaze (and amuse) government intelligence/defense-types how easily and for how long they can get away with telling the most ludicrous tales to the public about fanciful events they want us to think occurred. I’m sure by now their rationale is: Hey, if they’re this stupid, they deserve to be strung along. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77764658 Canada09/20/2019 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77992395  Germany09/20/2019 02:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74188487 United States09/20/2019 02:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73686849 United States09/20/2019 03:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Listen carefully. Humans CANNOT and will not get more than 350 MILES from the surface of THIS planet. There is a space radiation problem. Flesh creatures NEED a surrounding MAGNITOSPHERE. The one surrounding the Earth protects US. Metal emits harmful radiation when bombarded with gamma rays from space. So we need two things. Composite hulls on our space craft (zero metal) and a “portable “ magnetosphere. Not gonna happen in your lifetime. To busy buying and selling or making war. To busy with sports and kids. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77936915  United Kingdom09/20/2019 03:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 884495 United States09/20/2019 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Quoting: Prudent Nomad They don't have any goals, and they want to "engage the Moon." WTF. Sounds like they are growing their own weed, instead of planning for the moon. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78019013 United States09/20/2019 04:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wish we could start talking honestly and openly about what this place really is. Because it ain't a spinning ball. dark city guess who the strangers are? We know the Earth is flat, stationary and enclosed. We know the moon cannot be landed on and is some sort of projection on the firmament dome. (So are "stars" and "planets.") Why the lies about where we live? Is it really just about money, power and control --- or is there something else? Is there a programmed overlay-reality like in The Matrix or Thirteenth Floor? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76461169 United States09/20/2019 04:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short. Quoting: Prudent Nomad “What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.” The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration. According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues." [link to www.technology.org (secure)] I'll bet they try for 2069 for the "centennial" when there's no one around that knows it was all fake. And they'll fake it much better. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74188487 United States09/20/2019 04:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short. Quoting: Prudent Nomad “What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.” The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration. According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues." [link to www.technology.org (secure)] I'll bet they try for 2069 for the "centennial" when there's no one around that knows it was all fake. And they'll fake it much better. Lol probably |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78015052  Israel09/20/2019 04:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To get to the Moon (or even to fake it) in 1969 took plenty of Testosterone. With declining Testosterone and sperm counts (due to BPA and other Estrogenic pollutants), men around the world, but especially obese Americans, no longer have the requisite oomph to build or participate in any heroic endeavor or any much else that requires patience, intestinal fortitude. Without the hormone Testosterone, a man declines in strength, loses his libido, desire for glory, revenge and patriotism, which we are witnessing today. Once testosterone drops to 10 nmol/L, a man is considered to be dysgonadally castrated and pussified. A Moon or even Shuttle-type venture are out unless Testosterone levels return. The ISS is likely all we will ever see of men in space ever again! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78016029 Canada09/20/2019 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70945500  Australia09/20/2019 04:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 884495 United States09/20/2019 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To get to the Moon (or even to fake it) in 1969 took plenty of Testosterone. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78015052 With declining Testosterone and sperm counts (due to BPA and other Estrogenic pollutants), men around the world, but especially obese Americans, no longer have the requisite oomph to build or participate in any heroic endeavor or any much else that requires patience, intestinal fortitude. Without the hormone Testosterone, a man declines in strength, loses his libido, desire for glory, revenge and patriotism, which we are witnessing today. Once testosterone drops to 10 nmol/L, a man is considered to be dysgonadally castrated and pussified. A Moon or even Shuttle-type venture are out unless Testosterone levels return. The ISS is likely all we will ever see of men in space ever again! So all our would be astronauts are interior decorators and vegan massage therapists now? Great. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77972669 United States09/20/2019 05:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Quoting: Prudent Nomad They don't have any goals, and they want to "engage the Moon." WTF. Sounds like they are growing their own weed, instead of planning for the moon. maybe they'll grow weed on the moon - ? |
| Psalm119
User ID: 77731181 United States09/20/2019 05:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost like.... The Apollo missions were a big fat Hollywood hoax production? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47752129 I mean, since they killed Kubrick, err, he died... It sure is tough to 'go back'! Considering NASA could do it in 1969 you would think the Soviet Union or Russia or China or Japan or the European Space Agency would be able to do it 50 years later, no? Exactly!!! This summer I visited the Air and Space Museum in Dayton Ohio. And I have nothing but respect for Armed forces and that’s why I went there. But they also had a display from NASA from one of the Apollo missions and had the space capsule and stuff on display. Looking at it in person made me want to laugh. It looks like something my 11 year daughter would build in our garage. It was such a flimsy, mechanically lacking piece of metal that no one would survive coming back into the atmosphere in that contraption. It made it all the more laughable to think they sold the world this huge lie that we landed on the moon multiple times but yet haven’t been back in 60 years??? Give me a break!! This country is coming under Judgment. And when we finally get exposed to the entire world as being moon landing LIARS, our fall from Grace will be SPECTACULAR. |
| Psalm119
User ID: 77731181 United States09/20/2019 05:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short. Quoting: Prudent Nomad “What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.” The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration. According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars. Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues." [link to www.technology.org (secure)] I'll bet they try for 2069 for the "centennial" when there's no one around that knows it was all fake. And they'll fake it much better.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76708078 Canada09/20/2019 05:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost like.... The Apollo missions were a big fat Hollywood hoax production? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47752129 I mean, since they killed Kubrick, err, he died... It sure is tough to 'go back'! Considering NASA could do it in 1969 you would think the Soviet Union or Russia or China or Japan or the European Space Agency would be able to do it 50 years later, no? Just like Iran can’t make nukes more than 70 years later. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1897079 United States09/20/2019 05:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
