Top NASA Manager Says the 2024 Moon Landing by Astronauts might not Happen

Listen carefully.

Humans CANNOT and will not get more than 350 MILES from the surface of THIS planet.

There is a space radiation problem. Flesh creatures NEED a surrounding MAGNITOSPHERE. The one surrounding the Earth protects US. Metal emits harmful radiation when bombarded with gamma rays from space. So we need two things. Composite hulls on our space craft (zero metal) and a “portable “ magnetosphere.

Not gonna happen in your lifetime. To busy buying and selling or making war.

To busy with sports and kids.

Almost like.... The Apollo missions were a big fat Hollywood hoax production?

I mean, since they killed Kubrick, err, he died... It sure is tough to 'go back'!

Considering NASA could do it in 1969 you would think the Soviet Union or Russia or China or Japan or the European Space Agency would be able to do it 50 years later, no?

NO.

The COST of this ridiculous exercise in futility
would have been FAR out of reach of most nations
on Earth,
and would have bankrupted all but a few of the rest.

Russia pissed a fortune down the drain trying,
and decided the money could be better spent on
their massive military,

which left the USA as the ONLY nation on the planet
capable of financing that glorious enterprise.

The payoff for all the billions if not
trillions spent?
A bunch of rocks that robot vehicles could
have returned for a tiny fraction of the cost
of the manned missions.

There will NEVER be manned missions to Mars,
which would be suicide missions,
all for WHAT?
Mars is UNINHABITABLE and always will be.

This would be a COLOSSAL WASTE of our great
great grandchildren's money, as astronomical
DEBT continues to be the NEW NORMAL
until the world's economies finally collapse
under the weight of it all.

NO.

The COST of this ridiculous exercise in futility
would have been FAR out of reach of most nations
on Earth,
and would have bankrupted all but a few of the rest.

Russia pissed a fortune down the drain trying,
and decided the money could be better spent on
their massive military,

which left the USA as the ONLY nation on the planet
capable of financing that glorious enterprise.

The payoff for all the billions if not
trillions spent?
A bunch of rocks that robot vehicles could
have returned for a tiny fraction of the cost
of the manned missions.

There will NEVER be manned missions to Mars,
which would be suicide missions,
all for WHAT?
Mars is UNINHABITABLE and always will be.

This would be a COLOSSAL WASTE of our great
great grandchildren's money, as astronomical
DEBT continues to be the NEW NORMAL
until the world's economies finally collapse
under the weight of it all.

Exactly!!! This summer I visited the Air and Space Museum in Dayton Ohio. And I have nothing but respect for Armed forces and that’s why I went there. But they also had a display from NASA from one of the Apollo missions and had the space capsule and stuff on display. Looking at it in person made me want to laugh. It looks like something my 11 year daughter would build in our garage. It was such a flimsy, mechanically lacking piece of metal that no one would survive coming back into the atmosphere in that contraption. It made it all the more laughable to think they sold the world this huge lie that we landed on the moon multiple times but yet haven’t been back in 60 years??? Give me a break!!

This country is coming under Judgment. And when we finally get exposed to the entire world as being moon landing LIARS, our fall from Grace will be SPECTACULAR.

Keep kicking that can down the road NASA, it's what you do best.

[link to www.exopolitics.org (secure)]

Apollo Missions Ended Because Extraterrestrials Prevented US Navy Bases on Moon

"Navy planned to put 10,000 people on the Moon in the early 1970’s as part of a secret lunar bases program that was to be established through the NASA Apollo program. According to William Tompkins, a top aerospace designer who worked for major NASA corporate contractors during the Apollo era, the covert Navy plan came to a crushing end during the Apollo 11 mission when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were met by a fleet of menacing extraterrestrial spacecraft.

Tompkins’ account of what really happened on the Moon is explained in his recently published autobiography, Selected By Extraterrestrials. At the time of the Moon landing, Tompkins worked for TRW, a leading aerospace corporation that built the first NASA satellite, Pioneer 1."...

Almost like.... The Apollo missions were a big fat Hollywood hoax production?

I mean, since they killed Kubrick, err, he died... It sure is tough to 'go back'!

Considering NASA could do it in 1969 you would think the Soviet Union or Russia or China or Japan or the European Space Agency would be able to do it 50 years later, no?

But we made it there in a tin can wrapped in aluminum foil 50 years ago!!

This is easy shit boys!!

"Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short.

“What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.”

The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration.

According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars.

Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues."

[link to www.technology.org (secure)]

Funny they expect us to believe they went in the 60s buy haven't been back since

Now, even in 2024 they can make it?

Lol, you would think the tech now is way better then the 60s

These fucks think we are some stupid people

"Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short.

“What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.”

The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration.

According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars.

Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues."

[link to www.technology.org (secure)]

"Speaking before a Congressional subcommittee on Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Kenneth Bowersox, Acting Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, said NASA is doing everything in its power to meet the deadline set by the White House, but admitted that it might be too short.

“What’s important is that we launch when we’re ready, that we have a successful mission when it launches, and I’m not going to sit here and tell you that just arbitrarily we’re going to make it,” said Bowersox during the meeting. “There’s a lot of risk in making the date, but we want to try to do it.”

The initial plan was to launch the lunar mission – called Artemis after Apollo’s twin sister in Greek mythology – in 2028, but the deadline was eventually moved to 2024 at the urging of the Trump administration.

According to one of the mission’s greatest enthusiasts – the NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, the agency does not have any ground-breaking goals, but wants to engage the Moon as a critical training ground for the greatly anticipated future expeditions to Mars.

Bowersox expressed his appreciation for the goal’s aggressiveness, but emphasised that it might not be viable due to the need to secure funding and solve a whole plethora of technical issues."

[link to www.technology.org (secure)]

Spacex was founded in 2002.

17 years later it still can't reliably send people in space.


People who believe you can build a new launcher in a few years are fucking morons.

We have been there many times since. Just not manned missions.




They never said they can't. They said Trump's deadline is not realistic



Yes the tech is better. But it doesn't mean than building a new lunar launcher and lander goes faster. Actually modern techs take more time to build because they are more complex.



Your post makes it clear you are stupid

But a 5 year deadline way back in the 60's was plenty of time?! LOL

The Apollo program was started in 1961. The Moon landing was 1969. That's 8 years. And some of the work for it began in 1959.

Apollo's budget was 25 billion dollars. That's 175 billion in today's money. The entire NASA yearly budget is 21.5 billion.