SeveNation User ID: 77827043 United States 09/27/2019 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Yale professor of computer science, David Gelernter, explains how he was predisposed to believe in Darwinism, yet when he investigated it, he found it wanting:
#1 Gelernter explains that what’s known as the “Cambrian Explosion” showed the exact opposite of what Darwin predicted the fossil record would show. I
#2 Next, Gelernter shows how modern molecular biology has essentially destroyed Darwin’s theory by showing the complexity of protein and the impossibility that protein could have formed randomly.
(Molecular biologist Douglas Axe) estimated that, of all 150-link amino acid sequences, 1 in 1074 will be capable of folding into a stable protein. To say that your chances are 1 in 1074 is no different, in practice, from saying that they are zero. It’s not surprising that your chances of hitting a stable protein that performs some useful function, and might therefore play a part in evolution, are even smaller. Axe puts them at 1 in 1077.
In other words: immense is so big, and tiny is so small, that neo-Darwinian evolution is—so far—a dead loss. Try to mutate your way from 150 links of gibberish to a working, useful protein and you are guaranteed to fail. Try it with ten mutations, a thousand, a million—you fail. The odds bury you. It can’t be done.
Like it or not, conclusions in science are based on probabilities calculated by mathematicians. And the probability of observing new proteins, when calculated on the assumption that Darwin was right, is too low for the assumption to stand. An intellectually honest scientist is obligated to reject the assumption that Darwin was right. The time has come to admit there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Intelligent Design is the only reasonable alternative, unless you’re willing to resort to blind faith in the religion of naturalism. |
Urban Mythbuster
User ID: 41184450 United Kingdom 09/27/2019 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism The chariots of God are tens of thousands, and thousands of thousands. |
Fractals
User ID: 78033173 United Kingdom 09/27/2019 04:51 PM
Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Yale make shite alarms |
ToSeek
User ID: 9653749 United States 09/27/2019 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism
Gelernter, among other errors, assumes that you've got to go straight to a foldable 150-link amino acid and that nothing inbetween is any use at all. That's incorrect and not how evolution works. Also, I'm betting your numbers should be 10^74 and 10^77 rather than 1074 and 1077, since the latter would be no problem for evolution at all. You might want to read what you write before you post it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77903586 United Kingdom 09/27/2019 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Good. About time this loser nonsense was kicked off the pitch. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75707014 United States 09/27/2019 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Of course we all know the other scientists will band together and tell us that Gelenter is not qualified to opine on anything other than what his major was, which is computer science.
It's how they roll. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77060631 United States 09/27/2019 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism
Gelertner lost his right arm in 1973 to the Unibomber. But, Gelertner is correct in his ascertation that Darwin is wrong. It would take too many protein mutations over billions of years to make the Cambrian explosion happen so quickly. Just not enough time. [ link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Pretty good vid explaining this new hypothesis. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75133800 Australia 09/27/2019 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism You see a 747 flying overhead.
A very VERY complex machine in which every single part MUST do its job or the plane crashes.
This plane too thousands and thousands of hours to DESIGN...by teams of PHD holding smart guys.
Then it took trial and error to work out all the bugs.
OBVIOUSLY...THIS PLANE FLYING OVERHEAD...WAS NO ACCIDENT.
Now...an ALBATROSS flys past overhead...A BILLION TIMES MORE COMPLEX...AND EVERY part DID ITS JOB FROM SCRATCH...NO BUGS TO WORK OUT.
And these fuckwits tell us the BIRD IS THE ACCIDENT.
It takes 1000 TIMES MORE FAITH TO BELEIVE IN EVOLUTION than CREATION. |
Urban Mythbuster
User ID: 41184450 United Kingdom 09/27/2019 06:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Gelertner lost his right arm in 1973 to the Unibomber. But, Gelertner is correct in his ascertation that Darwin is wrong. It would take too many protein mutations over billions of years to make the Cambrian explosion happen so quickly. Just not enough time. [ link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Pretty good vid explaining this new hypothesis. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77060631 The chariots of God are tens of thousands, and thousands of thousands. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17045818 United States 10/08/2019 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism But the school taught me charles Darwin is god for 22 years |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18253217 United States 10/08/2019 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Well, Darwinism was established on a foundation of lies. They used faked discoveries to push aside older beliefs/teachings. When the "discoveries" where proven to be fake, they where like "oops", but would then years later try to claim the fakes weren't fake. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73564030 United States 10/08/2019 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A prominent Yale scientist has just publicly denounced Darwinism Professor of computer science talking about evolution. What an expert. |