LGBTQ Male striptease for children.. video | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77227614 United States 09/28/2019 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11126160 United States 09/28/2019 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [liveleak] [link to www.liveleak.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 847954 Canada 09/28/2019 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
El Capo
User ID: 77983047 United States 09/28/2019 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ScrumpTheTexan
Forum Administrator 09/28/2019 07:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They used to send child protective services out to the parent's home & take their kids away for this. Quoting: XeroGravity They used to beat people senseless for it, or worse... so damned sick of gays going after kids & idiot Satanic leftist "parents" enabling it and egging it on. I am a Christian. Christian does not equal doormat or pushover "I Have Sworn upon the Altar of God... Eternal Hostility against every form of Tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson, Sep. 23, 1800 The Election of Donald John Trump: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] For previous Newsletters, click 'Scrump's News Letters' @ [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] |
Lord Revan
User ID: 71174596 United States 09/28/2019 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SKULL PUPPY User ID: 78040902 United States 09/28/2019 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78040369 United States 09/28/2019 07:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 71071304 United States 09/28/2019 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've allowed in 2 states already post-birth abortion. Soon it will be all 50 states. The next step after that is to allow mothers to murder their children up till age 3. I'm not making this up. This is already being advocated by feminist marxist activists. When that day comes, for me, it's hockey mask time. Alone, or with others like me, I'm going to war. I can't tolerate infanticide. |
Paranoiaaaaa
Butters User ID: 77184268 United States 09/28/2019 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is wrong with the parents?? There is no way I wold have allowed my kids to watch that! "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you." - Fox Mulder - The X-Files "Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans." - John Lennon |
Paranoiaaaaa
Butters User ID: 77184268 United States 09/28/2019 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is wrong with the parents?? There is no way I wold have allowed my kids to watch that! Quoting: Paranoiaaaaa [liveleak] [link to www.liveleak.com (secure)] I tried to embed, but it's not showing. Last Edited by Paranoiaaaaa on 09/28/2019 08:06 PM "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you." - Fox Mulder - The X-Files "Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans." - John Lennon |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55295582 United States 09/28/2019 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77963234 United States 09/28/2019 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Peepaws
User ID: 1916326 United States 09/28/2019 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've allowed in 2 states already post-birth abortion. Soon it will be all 50 states. The next step after that is to allow mothers to murder their children up till age 3. I'm not making this up. This is already being advocated by feminist marxist activists. Quoting: XeroGravity When that day comes, for me, it's hockey mask time. Alone, or with others like me, I'm going to war. I can't tolerate infanticide. I would be interested to know who some of these feminist marxist activists are. And post birth abortion?! So in 2 states women can kill their baby? They want to sexualize children and kill them, kill their souls for sure. A society can't survive that kind of evil. Peepaws |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78040168 United States 09/28/2019 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They used to send child protective services out to the parent's home & take their kids away for this. Quoting: XeroGravity They used to beat people senseless for it, or worse... so damned sick of gays going after kids & idiot Satanic leftist "parents" enabling it and egging it on. :dive]: It would'nt be wise for you to attempt to beat them senseless as you say now days. Federal Hate Crimes law now mandates mandatory sentences. This is due to to the Matthew Shepherd act. A guy in Texas in Dickinson, Texas beat a gay guy and is now serving a 30 year prison sentence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78040168 United States 09/28/2019 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ScrumpTheTexas if you remember the case of James Byrd Jr. that happened in Jasper, Texas. So you know we still have to follow the law. Here's recap of the James Byrd Jr. case that spurred along with Matthew Shepherd mandatory sentencing. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, 18 U.S.C. § 249, was enacted as Division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. Section 249 of Title 18 provides funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate and prosecute hate crimes. It also creates a new federal criminal law which criminalizes willfully causing bodily injury (or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon) when: (1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person or (2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The newly enacted § 249 has three significant subsections. Subsection (a)(1) criminalizes violent acts (and attempts to commit violent acts undertaken with a dangerous weapon) when those acts occur because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person. This section of the statute has a broader reach than existing hate crime statutes. (18 U.S.C. § 245, for example, requires that government prove not only that the crime was motivated by animus but also because of the victimç—´ participation in one of six enumerated federally protected activities). Section 249(a)(1) was passed pursuant to Congress's Thirteenth Amendment authority to eradicate badges and incidents of slavery. The government need prove no other "jurisdictional" element to obtain a conviction. Subsection (a)(2) of § 249 protects a wider class of victims. Subsection (a)(2) criminalizes acts of violence (and attempts to commit violent acts undertaken with a dangerous weapon) when motivated by the actual or perceived gender, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity of any person. It will also apply to violent acts motivated by animus against those religions and national origins which were not considered to be "races" at the time the Thirteenth Amendment was passed. This portion of the statute was passed pursuant to Congress's Commerce Clause authority. Thus, to obtain a conviction, the government must prove that the crime was in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. Subsection (a)(2)(B) of the statute contains a detailed description of the ways the commerce clause element may be fulfilled. Subsection (a)(3) of § 249 provides for prosecution of crimes committed because of any of the characteristics defined in (a)(1) or (a)(2), whenever such crimes occur within the Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction (SMTJ) of the United States. The statute criminalizes only violent acts resulting in bodily injury or attempts to inflict bodily injury, through the use of fire, firearms, explosive and incendiary devices, or other dangerous weapons. The statute does not criminalize threats of violence. Threats to inflict physical injury may be prosecutable under other hate crimes statutes, such as 42 U.S.C. § 3631 or 18 U.S.C. § 245. Such threats may also be prosecutable under generally applicable federal laws preventing interstate communication of threats. Read recent opinions addressing constitutional challenges to the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act: |
DeplorableDoomsdayGuy
User ID: 77361703 United States 09/28/2019 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78033455 United States 09/28/2019 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78006067 United States 09/28/2019 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5336825 Canada 09/28/2019 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Repulsive. Don't know the details behind it, or where it is. One of the young girls in front shields her eyes out of embarrasment. Quoting: XeroGravity They used to send child protective services out to the parent's home & take their kids away for this. [link to www.liveleak.com (secure)] Can someone embed this link in a reply? Still trying to figure out how to do that. Thanks. LBGTQ and the rest need to go back into the closet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78040168 United States 09/28/2019 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ScrumpTheTexas if you remember the case of James Byrd Jr. that happened in Jasper, Texas. So you know we still have to follow the law. Here's recap of the James Byrd Jr. case that spurred along with Matthew Shepherd mandatory sentencing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78040168 The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, 18 U.S.C. § 249, was enacted as Division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. Section 249 of Title 18 provides funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate and prosecute hate crimes. It also creates a new federal criminal law which criminalizes willfully causing bodily injury (or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon) when: (1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person or (2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The newly enacted § 249 has three significant subsections. Subsection (a)(1) criminalizes violent acts (and attempts to commit violent acts undertaken with a dangerous weapon) when those acts occur because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person. This section of the statute has a broader reach than existing hate crime statutes. (18 U.S.C. § 245, for example, requires that government prove not only that the crime was motivated by animus but also because of the victimç—´ participation in one of six enumerated federally protected activities). Section 249(a)(1) was passed pursuant to Congress's Thirteenth Amendment authority to eradicate badges and incidents of slavery. The government need prove no other "jurisdictional" element to obtain a conviction. Subsection (a)(2) of § 249 protects a wider class of victims. Subsection (a)(2) criminalizes acts of violence (and attempts to commit violent acts undertaken with a dangerous weapon) when motivated by the actual or perceived gender, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity of any person. It will also apply to violent acts motivated by animus against those religions and national origins which were not considered to be "races" at the time the Thirteenth Amendment was passed. This portion of the statute was passed pursuant to Congress's Commerce Clause authority. Thus, to obtain a conviction, the government must prove that the crime was in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. Subsection (a)(2)(B) of the statute contains a detailed description of the ways the commerce clause element may be fulfilled. Subsection (a)(3) of § 249 provides for prosecution of crimes committed because of any of the characteristics defined in (a)(1) or (a)(2), whenever such crimes occur within the Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction (SMTJ) of the United States. The statute criminalizes only violent acts resulting in bodily injury or attempts to inflict bodily injury, through the use of fire, firearms, explosive and incendiary devices, or other dangerous weapons. The statute does not criminalize threats of violence. Threats to inflict physical injury may be prosecutable under other hate crimes statutes, such as 42 U.S.C. § 3631 or 18 U.S.C. § 245. Such threats may also be prosecutable under generally applicable federal laws preventing interstate communication of threats. Read recent opinions addressing constitutional challenges to the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act: So, we still have to follow the law. ScrumpTheTexas I'm sure you are aware about the black man James Byrd Jr. that was dragged behind a pickup truck to death in Jasper, Texas and I'm sure you are aware of the young man in Dickinson, Texas that was just sentenced to 30 years for assault upon a transgender gay man. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78040168 United States 09/28/2019 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where and when did this happen? Did this happen in the United States? Because while pointing out Hate Crime Statue I will also point out that this is 2nd degree felony behavior and should be elevated since it involves minor children. Indecent exposure is the knowing exposure of one’s genitals, or other private anatomical parts, in the presence of another while disregarding the offensive, insulting, or frightening effect it may have. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the commission on an indecent exposure offense, a defendant could be charged with a felony or misdemeanor level offense. Read on to learn more about what is considered indecent exposure, some possible defenses, and the penalties and consequences of an indecent exposure conviction. Anyone know where and when this happened? |
LoneStarRising
Forum Moderator User ID: 74646345 United States 09/28/2019 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They used to send child protective services out to the parent's home & take their kids away for this. Quoting: XeroGravity They used to beat people senseless for it, or worse... so damned sick of gays going after kids & idiot Satanic leftist "parents" enabling it and egging it on. I think many Leftist "parents" actually turn their kids gay on purpose. They actually think it is fashionable and open-minded to have a gay child. Just another way they can virtue signal to their Leftist friends. LoneStarRising |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77738710 United States 09/28/2019 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember when the debate to allow homosexuals to adopt children happened. the argument against it was people were concerned that homos would influence the kids they adopted to become homosexuals themselves . The gheys kept complaining it would never happen and the courts allowed them to adopt as gay couples. fast forward to 2019 BEDLAM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77738710 United States 09/28/2019 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where and when did this happen? Did this happen in the United States? Because while pointing out Hate Crime Statue I will also point out that this is 2nd degree felony behavior and should be elevated since it involves minor children. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78040168 Indecent exposure is the knowing exposure of one’s genitals, or other private anatomical parts, in the presence of another while disregarding the offensive, insulting, or frightening effect it may have. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the commission on an indecent exposure offense, a defendant could be charged with a felony or misdemeanor level offense. Read on to learn more about what is considered indecent exposure, some possible defenses, and the penalties and consequences of an indecent exposure conviction. Anyone know where and when this happened? well if it happened in Miami , that is no longer part of the United States. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77754923 United States 09/28/2019 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77754923 United States 09/28/2019 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where and when did this happen? Did this happen in the United States? Because while pointing out Hate Crime Statue I will also point out that this is 2nd degree felony behavior and should be elevated since it involves minor children. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78040168 Indecent exposure is the knowing exposure of one’s genitals, or other private anatomical parts, in the presence of another while disregarding the offensive, insulting, or frightening effect it may have. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the commission on an indecent exposure offense, a defendant could be charged with a felony or misdemeanor level offense. Read on to learn more about what is considered indecent exposure, some possible defenses, and the penalties and consequences of an indecent exposure conviction. Anyone know where and when this happened? The video said Brazil. Sadly I was relieved. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77754923 United States 09/28/2019 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70732847 United States 09/28/2019 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Repulsive. Don't know the details behind it, or where it is. One of the young girls in front shields her eyes out of embarrasment. Quoting: XeroGravity They used to send child protective services out to the parent's home & take their kids away for this. [link to www.liveleak.com (secure)] Can someone embed this link in a reply? Still trying to figure out how to do that. Thanks. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
CUB4DK
User ID: 77998032 Canada 09/28/2019 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |