| Users Online Now: 2,144 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,534,589 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,549,519 | Threads Today: 1,022 | Posts Today: 18,100 |
| 11:43 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,144 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,534,589 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,549,519 | Threads Today: 1,022 | Posts Today: 18,100 |
| 11:43 PM | ||
The cost of Trump’s tariffs has fallen ‘entirely’ on US businesses and households: Goldman | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77173110  United States10/07/2019 07:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76103257 But that doesn't back up your statement that there were one million new jobs in July. Because there we not one million new jobs in July. yes there were, there were 1 million new jobs postings in the month of July than available workers. You just like to argue because you are stupid. No American wants to see their economy go down hill unless they are an enemy of the state. Just because you keep repeating the same false statement doesn't make it become true. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics report for July: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 164,000 in July, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.7 percent [link to www.bls.gov (secure)] It does make it true because it is, True. There were over 1 million new jobs postings In the month of July than available workers [link to www.marketwatch.com (secure)] "Jake News" busted. Again. Any further comment would be superfluous. |
Jake
 User ID: 77849624 United States10/07/2019 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Jake yes there were, there were 1 million new jobs postings in the month of July than available workers. You just like to argue because you are stupid. No American wants to see their economy go down hill unless they are an enemy of the state. Just because you keep repeating the same false statement doesn't make it become true. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics report for July: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 164,000 in July, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.7 percent [link to www.bls.gov (secure)] It does make it true because it is, True. There were over 1 million new jobs postings In the month of July than available workers [link to www.marketwatch.com (secure)] "Jake News" busted. Again. Any further comment would be superfluous. No proven right again you are a dipshit. we are reaching the point of the best economy in 100 years Last Edited by Slowly awakening on 10/07/2019 07:17 PM Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance! Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78049681 United States10/07/2019 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| xenophon
User ID: 77883755  Australia10/07/2019 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Jake no moron it was in the jobs report, these are reports from privately owned companies. 1 million new jobs... deal with it. Keep on making an ass of yourself with those Jake News stats! “ The unemployment rate declined to 3.5 percent in September, and total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 136,000” That’s a few jobs short of million, dontcha think?  July Jobs Report had had 1 million more Jobs Listings Than Employees to fill them, google it. OK, I googled it: Bureau of Labor Statistics September report: The unemployment rate declined to 3.5 percent in September, and total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 136,000, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. [link to www.bls.gov (secure)] Just cut your bullshit here and go play in your own thread. Lol @ the fake unemployment rate, how can anyone believe it's only 3.5% is beyond me Non farm payrolls have been manipulated since 2000, the figure means nothing No surprise that the narrative is focusing on that and ignoring the indicators with merit which show the economy is shrinking the 3rd shaking |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78062665  United Kingdom10/07/2019 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76103257 But that doesn't back up your statement that there were one million new jobs in July. Because there we not one million new jobs in July. yes there were, there were 1 million new jobs postings in the month of July than available workers. You just like to argue because you are stupid. No American wants to see their economy go down hill unless they are an enemy of the state. Just because you keep repeating the same false statement doesn't make it become true. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics report for July: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 164,000 in July, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.7 percent [link to www.bls.gov (secure)] It does make it true because it is, True. There were over 1 million new jobs postings In the month of July than available workers [link to www.marketwatch.com (secure)] Nowhere in that article does it say that 1 million new jobs were created in July; however, the US Labor Department stated that 164,000 new jobs were created in July. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71614805 United States10/07/2019 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78062668 Australia10/07/2019 07:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] Trade wars are good and easy to win. --- Donald Trump, March 2018 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76461169 United States10/07/2019 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] Oy gavult, we must beLIEve GOLDMAN! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74775434 United States10/07/2019 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] China has exhibited bad behavior for decades. Blatant theft of American IP and currency manipulation. Both of these cost American jobs. If companies manufacturing their crap in China feel enough pain, they will move. The might not move back to the US, but rather to a country that doesn't screw us over (IP & manipulation). We cannot continue to reward bad behavior and look the other way. China needs to be dialed in and spanked, and the tariffs are hurting them despite what they claim publicly. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77386563 United States10/07/2019 07:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78062668 Australia10/07/2019 07:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] Oy gavult, we must beLIEve GOLDMAN! I guess Trump believed Goldman when he filled his swamp by hiring Steve Mnuchin, who worked at Goldman-Sachs for 17 years. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76628791 United States10/07/2019 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| xenophon
User ID: 77883755 Australia10/07/2019 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] China has exhibited bad behavior for decades. Blatant theft of American IP and currency manipulation. Both of these cost American jobs. If companies manufacturing their crap in China feel enough pain, they will move. The might not move back to the US, but rather to a country that doesn't screw us over (IP & manipulation). We cannot continue to reward bad behavior and look the other way. China needs to be dialed in and spanked, and the tariffs are hurting them despite what they claim publicly. If trump was serious he would've delisted Chinese stocks, turned out to be another empty threat. He's a master of good cop bad cop muppet theatre. He would rather sacrifice his own than attack the enemy in real time the 3rd shaking |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78062668 Australia10/07/2019 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] Fuck off, you white genocide motherfucking commie cocksucker. How did that story trigger you into that rant? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71614805 United States10/07/2019 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| doom User ID: 40210044 United States10/07/2019 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The biggest problem we all have, both left and right are huge companies like Amazon that will eventually put the entire nation out of work. Jake, you're a real swell person, polite and courteous, but you are out of your fucking mind on the shit you believe. Amazon starts workers at $15/hr. These entry level jobs have the skill level of minimum wage flipping burgers type jobs at about twice the pay. Amazon .com is millions of small businesses who send their products, inventions, new American brand products that are invented by Americans who need a way to market what they produce. Terrible, huh? Lets eliminate Amazon so workers can make less at the big brand brick and mortar stores, at higher prices. Then eliminate ALL Chinese goods, and we can all sing kumbaya, holding hands, selling pine cones and flip phones made in the USA by attention deficit millenials who will be jumping for joy to work for $400/mo. I really want this tariff bullshit to be a lesson for tariff tards. I'd like to see the full impact of the inflation, as expected, raising interest rates and crashing the stock market, housing market, auto market (GM and Ford buy a shitload of Chinese components to make cars and all that is going up in price). Oh no, China will pay! Bullshit ! Asians are the cheapest people on earth, and will not lower prices to absorb tarrifs. They count every cent and the only thing that keeps their prices down is competition by other companies within their country. They don't give a hoot that US just taxed its own citizens on after-tax dollars for consumers. It just proves how ignorant Americans can be when it comes to math. EVERYTHING will be going up. Businesses will scale down inventories and employees. Good, I'm done trying to convince anyone, I want it to happen exactly at Q1 2020, as expected, and a huge recession within two years. I want to see markets crash and millions living in tent cities due to foreclosures. Then and only then will the tariff tards get it. Until then, just keep dancing on the deck of the Titanic because its too big and proud to sink.. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77159053 United States10/07/2019 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| MlCHAEL
User ID: 75756457  Canada10/07/2019 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| xenophon
User ID: 77883755 Australia10/07/2019 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] China has exhibited bad behavior for decades. Blatant theft of American IP and currency manipulation. Both of these cost American jobs. If companies manufacturing their crap in China feel enough pain, they will move. The might not move back to the US, but rather to a country that doesn't screw us over (IP & manipulation). We cannot continue to reward bad behavior and look the other way. China needs to be dialed in and spanked, and the tariffs are hurting them despite what they claim publicly. If trump was serious he would've delisted Chinese stocks, turned out to be another empty threat. He's a master of good cop bad cop muppet theatre. He would rather sacrifice his own than attack the enemy in real time Trump has 100,000,000 patriots behind him. You stupid globalist motherfucker. Die of cancer. Maybe you can bleed out your ass, like you bleed out your fucking mouth. Bitch. So the Don is getting the fed to devalue USD for 100,000,000 patriots so they have to pay more for goods while multi national companies can make more profit? the 3rd shaking |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78062668 Australia10/07/2019 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1 million jobs in July and not enough people to fill them Quoting: Jake This means wages are going up and they are Does not matter how high wages rise. It takes around 18 years to produce a new worker. Supply to current demand needed to be planned for 20 years ago. Speaking for myself and probably for many others here, I think it does matter if I get a raise each year that is at least greater than than the inflation rate. That's just not happening. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76555987  France10/07/2019 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1 million jobs in July and not enough people to fill them Quoting: Jake This means wages are going up and they are Does not matter how high wages rise. It takes around 18 years to produce a new worker. Supply to current demand needed to be planned for 20 years ago. OK, so that means Bill Clinton should get the credit for all these new jobs we are seeing now. lol |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76023515 United States10/07/2019 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| gizmo User ID: 40210044 United States10/07/2019 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obviously we can't compete without a crutch, so its no use taxing ourselves into higher prices. Just accept that you get cheap labor overseas and stop trying to fix what is not broken. They work for less than we are willing to, so they win the market. Pure capitalism. But, manufacturing is a small portion of pricing of goods, so realize that value added re-sellers (VAR) import companies in the US pay taxes and employ workers too. If an importer sources a product in China for $15, and pays $5 on average to get it here, the cost is $20. The importer puts his brand on the product and writes the instructions in English, hires an office staff in the US, warehouse personnel to fulfill orders, and is definitely contributing to the US economy with jobs and taxes on profits. The importer wholesales the widget for $45, pays his employees and overhead costs and nets $12 profit on a $15 Chinese made good. The manufacturer only profited $3 on that item. The US importer made 4x the profit and is still competitive when the consumer buys this hard to find item at $89 retail. The store hires cashiers and personel and pays taxes on its profit. What difference does it make if we made the widget in the USA for $25, or bought it from a country with cheap labor at $15? The profit margin on the US side is higher, and the price at retail is lower than if it was made in the USA. Let China make $3, and the importer make $12, and the retailer get $44 in pure margin markup. Seems like a great return on investment. Where can we find a country with workers willing to produce goods for less? Oh, right we already have that, its China and we should feel lucky to have them willing to work for next to nothing. Fat, lazy, overpaid US workers will make more by just marketing the gizmo and selling it. It still produces US wealth. Now the US Government is taxing the consumer, NOT China, and prices will go up for the tariff tards to enjoy if they buy anything at all besides internet bandwidth. |
| regenerated
User ID: 77776184 United States10/07/2019 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77843939 United States10/07/2019 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Jake July Jobs Report had had 1 million more Jobs Listings Than Employees to fill them, google it. OK, I googled it: Bureau of Labor Statistics September report: The unemployment rate declined to 3.5 percent in September, and total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 136,000, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. [link to www.bls.gov (secure)] Just cut your bullshit here and go play in your own thread. Dip shit [link to www.cbsnews.com (secure)] Total of 7.9 million job openings right now. But that doesn't back up your statement that there were one million new jobs in July. Because there we not one million new jobs in July. Yes it does. There are 1 million more jobs. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 51278081 Canada10/07/2019 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Goldman Sachs said the cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households, with a greater impact on consumer prices than previously expected. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77977379 The bank said in a note that consumer prices are higher partly because Chinese exporters have not lowered their prices to better compete in the US market. Trump has repeatedly — and inaccurately — claimed that China will pay for tariffs imposed by the U.S. “One might have expected that Chinese exporters of tariff-affected goods would have to lower their prices somewhat to compete in the US market, sharing in the cost of the tariffs,” Goldman said. “However, analysis at the extremely detailed item level in the two new studies shows no decline in the prices (exclusive of tariffs) of imported goods from China that faced tariffs.” Goldman also said the risk of a final round of tariffs on the roughly $300 billion of remaining imports from China has now risen to 30%. Further escalation of the trade war could also result in a 0.4% hit to GDP, and if trade tensions instigated a sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen, Goldman said. [link to cnb.cx (secure)] You didn't give a shit about our burdens during the bailouts of 08......haha why you care now? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78061438 United States10/07/2019 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77771414 Keep on making an ass of yourself with those Jake News stats! “ The unemployment rate declined to 3.5 percent in September, and total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 136,000” That’s a few jobs short of million, dontcha think? July Jobs Report had had 1 million more Jobs Listings Than Employees to fill them, google it. OK, I googled it: Bureau of Labor Statistics September report: The unemployment rate declined to 3.5 percent in September, and total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 136,000, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. [link to www.bls.gov (secure)] Just cut your bullshit here and go play in your own thread. Lol @ the fake unemployment rate, how can anyone believe it's only 3.5% is beyond me Non farm payrolls have been manipulated since 2000, the figure means nothing No surprise that the narrative is focusing on that and ignoring the indicators with merit which show the economy is shrinking No surprise you ignore how much the American economy would have shrunk with wide open borders, 10 million jihadist imported in for a civil war, 95% tax rate, no cars, no hamburgers and all the rest of the alternatives you miss. Go fuck yourself. You got a third rate college education and most likely cheated to get your degree. Ass wipe. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49838646 United States10/07/2019 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1 million jobs in July and not enough people to fill them Quoting: Jake This means wages are going up and they are Do you really need to make a fool of yourself in every thread by posting fake bullshit? Average hourly earnings grew by 2.9% from the year-ago period, the metric's slowest pace of growth since July 2018 - and just 1.2 percentage points higher than the last recorded US inflation rate. And though the unemployment rate may be at a five-decade low, slowing wage growth is a dire threat to the nation's economy. Lower income generally begets decreased spending, kicking off a cycle that could threaten employment, investment, and economic growth. [link to markets.businessinsider.com (secure)] It's still outpacing inflation, which is more than you can say for Resident Zero. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78061438 United States10/07/2019 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74775434 China has exhibited bad behavior for decades. Blatant theft of American IP and currency manipulation. Both of these cost American jobs. If companies manufacturing their crap in China feel enough pain, they will move. The might not move back to the US, but rather to a country that doesn't screw us over (IP & manipulation). We cannot continue to reward bad behavior and look the other way. China needs to be dialed in and spanked, and the tariffs are hurting them despite what they claim publicly. If trump was serious he would've delisted Chinese stocks, turned out to be another empty threat. He's a master of good cop bad cop muppet theatre. He would rather sacrifice his own than attack the enemy in real time Trump has 100,000,000 patriots behind him. You stupid globalist motherfucker. Die of cancer. Maybe you can bleed out your ass, like you bleed out your fucking mouth. Bitch. So the Don is getting the fed to devalue USD for 100,000,000 patriots so they have to pay more for goods while multi national companies can make more profit? The Don is keeping the country from going far left globalist, you stupid motherfucker. You Aussies still sucking more dick per capita than San Fransisco? I'd love China to nuke your ass. I'd throw a party that you motherfuckers are burnt alive. You globalist prison planet motherfucker. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49838646 United States10/07/2019 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bullshit. I have noticed zero inflation on made-in-China goods. China is absorbing the cost of the tariffs, desperately hoping to stop the hemorrhaging of factories relocating to other turd-world countries. |
