What laws have Trump broken? Can't seem to get a straight answer.

They can't answer. Then they will call you "racist", and start to cry.

Thanks for this thread. I get the same results when I ask.

None...that's why they can't impeach him.

I do not get it either OP. Let's see the list.

There has to be a law against what the media monopoly is doing and has done to Him. I can not the watch the news, non stop trashing Trump. False accusations are always the top story over major disasters.

Not only can they not answer factually regarding law abuse, they can not answer exactly how Trump has adversely affected their lives.

I guess they really don't want jobs or tax cuts. Well, I do and my life is a hella lot better than it was under Obastard or would have been under Hitlery.

Same results here. No response, because there isn't any.

Crickets.

I am proud of so many from the USA that can think for themselves in light of the constant media monopoly brain washing biased deceptions. I bet they did not expect that and kept ramping it up to no avail.
Maybe He will get another term, if for no other reason than people fed up with the corrupt media reporting, if we can win over voter fraud and corruption etc.

THIS

They say, "Oh, my GOD, there are so many!"

Then I say, "name one".

crickets.

You know he is doing right by the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the globalists and their puppets.

Well, I've been working all day. Seems no good answer still. Even from the nevertrumper AC's. I figured at least one or two would have answers.

Anyone???

orange man bad...

The Dems think it was against the law for him to win an election against Hitlery.

I'm still waiting for their so called evidence.

He defeated their queen.
But the real fear is what he is going to unleash and expose them all.
Timing is everything, and the time has begun leading up to the next election.
Ya can’t campaign from gitmo...

Just watch, if you read his book, you know what’s coming.

Obstruction of justice is a bullshit charge. There is no obstruction of justice if no law has been broken. It’s like when cops arrest people for resisting arrest and that is the only charge they levy. Well you arrested the person for nothing so the court throws that out.

Or the court should throw that out. They usually do... if you’re white

None. That is why the dems are blaming him for shit they do daily.

If Trump broke any law you would know everything about that law because it would be the only thing the media would talk about. He hasn't so they don't.

None, that's why he's not impeached or in prison! Fuck those commie cock suckers!

As one other person here has said, the law he broke, the most egregious impeachable offense He has committed is, he won the election.

They TOLD him it was 'HER' turn, They told him 'SHE' was to be the first 'Gynecologic' President (The Gynecosident, as it were).

He made her cry and say bad words, he made her sad. She stamped her little feet and bloviated, "It was my turn".


Oh yeah, Bill was unhappy as well, he'd had plans on becoming the first husband and the new, "Billy Bob Carter".

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

What the interwebs has on it.

Impeachment is the ability to prosecute a sitting president for a crime. Impeachment is not the ability to remove a sitting president because you don't like him/her.

None

Home
Random
Nearby
Log in
Settings
About Wikipedia

Disclaimers
Open main menu
Wikipedia
Search
Efforts to impeach Donald Trump
Read in another language
Download PDF
Watch
Edit
For the formal proceedings, see Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump.
Various people and groups assert that U.S. president Donald Trump has engaged in impeachable activity both before and during his presidency,[1][2] and talk of impeachment began before he took office.[3][4] Formal efforts were initiated by representatives Al Green and Brad Sherman, both Democrats, in 2017, the first year of his presidency.[5][6] On September 24, 2019, Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi announced that six committees would undertake formal impeachment inquiries after reports about controversial interactions between Trump and the country of Ukraine.[7]

Grounds asserted for impeachment have included possible violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by accepting payments from foreign dignitaries; alleged collusion with Russia during the campaign for the 2016 United States presidential election; alleged obstruction of justice with respect to investigation of the collusion claim; and accusations of "Associating the Presidency with White Nationalism, Neo-Nazism and Hatred", which formed the basis of a resolution for impeachment brought on December 6, 2017. Since the Republicans controlled both the House and the Senate during 2017 and 2018, the likelihood of impeachment during that period was considered by all to be low.[8][9] A December 2017 resolution of impeachment failed in the House by a 58–364 margin.[10] The Democrats gained control of the House in 2019 and launched multiple investigations into Trump's actions and finances. Speaker Nancy Pelosi initially resisted calls for impeachment. In May 2019 she indicated that Trump's continued actions, which she characterized as obstruction of justice and refusal to honor congressional subpoenas, might make an impeachment inquiry necessary. An increasing number of House Democrats and one Republican were requesting such an inquiry.


Protesters calling for impeachment on the day of Trump's inauguration
In December 2016, Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren, Dick Durbin, Chris Coons, Ben Cardin, and Jeff Merkley introduced a bill that would require the president of the United States to divest any assets that could raise a conflict of interest, including a statement that failure to divest such assets would constitute high crimes and misdemeanors "under the impeachment clause of the U.S. Constitution".[3] Vanity Fair characterized this as a preemptive effort to lay the groundwork for a future impeachment argument.[3] Concerns had previously been expressed that Trump's extensive business and real estate dealings, especially with respect to government agencies in other countries, may violate the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution,[4] sparking debate as to whether that is the case.[11][12]

Immediately after his inauguration, The Independent and The Washington Post each reported on efforts already underway to impeach Trump, based on what the organizers regard as conflicts of interest arising from Trump's ability to use his political position to promote the interests of "Trump"-branded businesses, and ongoing payments by foreign entities to businesses within the Trump business empire as a violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause.[1][2] In March 2017, China provisionally granted 38 "Trump" trademark applications set to take permanent effect in 90 days, which were noted to come in close proximity to the president's making policy decisions favorable to China.[13]

The Washington Post further noted the creation of ImpeachDonaldTrumpNow.org by Free Speech For People and RootsAction, two liberal advocacy groups.[2] On February 9, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D, NY) had filed a resolution of inquiry titled "H.Con.Res. 5" to force the Trump administration to turn over documents relating to potential conflicts of interest and to ties with Russia.[14] Some sources identified this as the first step in the process of impeaching Trump.[15][16] Fox News outlined two potential bases for impeachment, one being the Emoluments Clause and the other being complicity with Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election.[17] On March 21, it was widely reported that Congresswoman Maxine Waters tweeted "Get ready for impeachment," which Waters explained was in reference to the allegations of collusion with Russian interference in the election.[18]

On January 17, 2019, new accusations involving Trump surfaced, claiming he instructed his long-time lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie under oath surrounding Trump's involvement with the Russian government to erect a Trump Tower in Moscow.[19] This also sparked calls for an investigation and for the president to "resign or be impeached" should such claims be proven genuine.[20] The Mueller Report was released on April 18, 2019, and Robert Mueller himself made follow-up comments on May 29. The report reached no conclusion about whether Trump had committed criminal obstruction of justice.[21] Mueller strongly hinted that it was up to Congress to make such a determination. Congressional support for an impeachment inquiry increased as a result.[22]

A formal impeachment inquiry was launched on September 24, 2019, as a response to the Trump–Ukraine scandal, in which Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani pressed the Ukrainian government repeatedly since at least May 2019 to investigate Hunter Biden, the son of 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden.[23][24][25][26][27] The purpose of the requested investigation was alleged to be to hurt Biden's campaign for President.[28][29] In July Trump issued a hold on military aid scheduled to sent to Ukraine, releasing it in September after controversy arose. There was widespread speculation that the withholding of the aid was intended to force Ukraine to investigate Biden;

In other words
Nothing

I play this when we're on the river!


Last Edited by Truth Reaper on 10/18/2019 06:20 PM

Feelings.

Everything he does is illegal because they have Trump Derangement Syndrome!

here is your answer.

why do they see President Trump as their enemy, because
he isn't part of their club!

drain the swamp Mr President!