Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,560 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 560,586
Pageviews Today: 731,182Threads Today: 216Posts Today: 2,952
06:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Judge reopens Covington teen Nicholas Sandmann’s $250M suit against the Washington Post

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73526847
United States
10/29/2019 05:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Judge reopens Covington teen Nicholas Sandmann’s $250M suit against the Washington Post
Never give a liberal lawyer or judge a second chance to screw you over. They will do it every time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55785116
United States
10/29/2019 06:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Judge reopens Covington teen Nicholas Sandmann’s $250M suit against the Washington Post
It looks like the Judge was afraid he would be overruled by the appeals court. So, to try and keep control of the case in his hyper-biased courtroom. It appears he reopened the door just a crack to the Sandemann suit so he could screw over the plaintiffs over at a later date.

Typical liberal tactic.

His lawyers should have gone to appeal the full case ruling. They probably would have won. Then the case would be removed from the clutches of the bias of that particular judge.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73526847

Very well reasoned comment.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73526847
United States
10/29/2019 06:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Judge reopens Covington teen Nicholas Sandmann’s $250M suit against the Washington Post
It looks like the Judge was afraid he would be overruled by the appeals court. So, to try and keep control of the case in his hyper-biased courtroom. It appears he reopened the door just a crack to the Sandemann suit so he could screw over the plaintiffs over at a later date.

Typical liberal tactic.

His lawyers should have gone to appeal the full case ruling. They probably would have won. Then the case would be removed from the clutches of the bias of that particular judge.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73526847

Very well reasoned comment.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55785116


Thanks.





GLP