FOX: Mom Finds Her 15-Year-Old Missing Daughter in 60 Adult Videos on Pornhub, Periscope and Snapchat

holy fuck.....he’s black! so shocked. lol. fucking apes.

you really are an idiot.

Fact is a jury will not convict on just a click...a bunch of clicks specifically for this. But again pornhub us reputible, not you fault if your playing by the rules.

15 is hardly a child, if she consented it’s half her own doing. If she was kidnapped then what the guy with the cat avatar said

No, people who understand whats criminal. perhaps you will figure out the prosecution for a rare click dosent jappen

I didn’t look any different by 20 than I did at 15, and he could have lied and said she was 18 or older in the videos

I don’t doubt it. Some of these folks in this thread want people thrown into prison labeled pedophiles for clicking links though. It doesn’t matter if the link said 80 yr old granny sex they’d still label people pedophiles for clicking it. That’s so retarded.

15 is still a baby. She may have the working parts but her brian is still way undeveloped and does not have the mental and emotional capacity to consent. You lack the mental and emotional capacity to understand this. Stay off the internet kid.

She was obviously jacking-off like everyone else on there.....duh

If by judge you mean God, we will all face him.

Pointing out what the scripture teaches regarding adult-child marriage is not a bad thing.

If you meant a human judge - no - I've done nothing illegal.

The fact that you pretend I have, is why I said you keep joking around about this, when you should be taking it seriously.

The pharisees and satan all quoted scripture too. Anyone can but without Holy Spirit discernment, they cut themselves with its two-edged blade.

I'm sure Epstein et al quoted scripture for their antichrist teachings. You're definitely coming down on the wrong side of this.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 03:50 AM

I don't plan to go to hell, if that's what you mean.

Messed up the quote, sorry.

The pharisees and satan all quoted scripture too. Anyone can but without Holy Spirit discernment, they cut themselves with its two-edged blade.

I'm sure Epstein, pedo priests, et al. quote scripture for their antichrist teachings all the time. You're definitely coming down on the wrong side of this.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 03:52 AM

Weyoun, I was not twisting scripture. But you wouldn't know, cause you said you didn't read it.

The truth is, child marriage was not only permitted in ancient Israel, it was mandated by God in Deuteronomy for cases of adult-child fornication.

Thread: FOX: Mom Finds Her 15-Year-Old Missing Daughter in 60 Adult Videos on Pornhub, Periscope and Snapchat (Page 5)

Many Christians try to ignore this.

Another example is King David's relationship with Abishag, also a na'arah (1 Kings 1:1-4)

And 40-year-old Isaac (Genesis 25:20), with Rebekah, who was 10 or 14 according to Jewish manuscripts.
[link to jewishencyclopedia.com]
[link to jwa.org (secure)]

If something offends your conscience, then for you it is sin. (Romans 14:13).
But it was not sin for Isaac, nor for King David, nor for the Israelites under Moses.

I am not the wisest person, but I believe you are on the wrong side of this.

I already warned you but you continue on with your antichrist teachings. It is bad enough you are pedofile, but you try to use scripture to support your pedofilia, that puts you in the category of antichrist false teacher, which is doubly and triply worse.

Israelites were big sinners, as were Issac, David, Moses, etc... They all did tons of bad things. They sin bigly and sin bigly to this day. The pharisees tried to use your tactic too and asked Jesus about the divorce laws. Since you claim to know scripture so well, you can go read Jesus' response and apply the same principle.

God can turn anything bad, including sin, for his ultimate good, that does not mean the sin is excused or given license thereto. God used Israel for his ultimate good purpose inspite of their tremendous sins and evils, to show how awesome and powerful He is, to testify to His greatness.

Since you claim to know scripture, I'm sure you know the story of Esther, where she was forced to be a sex slave but God used her new position to save Israel. Does that justify the sex slavery? No, of course not!

This is my last warning to you. Cease your antichrist teachings in promotion of pedophile abomination. I will waste no more time on you.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 05:26 AM

You are very wrong, Weyoun.

Isaac's wife Rebekah was given to him by God.

Remember, she drew water for his camels at the well, as a sign from God?

King David's relationship with Abishag was presented beautifully in 1 Kings.
And you, again, fail to read what's right in front of you in Deuteronomy.

It is true that God also permitted divorce in the OT, and then prohibited it in the New Testament.

However, God never commanded someone to commit a divorce in the OT, while he did direct Isaac to marry Rebekah.

You are failing to read the scriptures honestly.

I do not care for your extra-biblical falsehoods and claims derived from so-called "Jewish manuscripts." Your presumption of pedofile marriage between Issac and Rebekah is false to begin with. Pedo false rabbis and pedo false priests have been making crap up for their antichrist teachings for thousands of years. If you want to follow the false teachings of fake rabbis, you can move to Tel Viv. America is a CHRISTIAN nation, we follow Jesus, not deitized ancestors or fake rabbis. Your defense of pedofiles, especially in the context of this thread about a child being enslaved to be a porn star, is horrific.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 05:46 AM

- It OFF-TOPIC to this thread. I meant no connection. Don't create a connection where there is none.

- You can dispute historical records outside of the Bible, but you cannot simply ignore scholarship to defend your own interpretations.
How do you think translators even learn Hebrew and Greek?

- You repeatedly ignore the passage in Deuteronomy that mandated marriage in cases of adult-child fornication.

And nowhere is it even hinted that God considered it to be inappropriate.

You are filtering the Bible from your own predetermined point of view.

The Jewish tradition of betrothal at around age 12 is consistent with Song of Solomon 8:8, Ezekiel 16:7-8,
which associate the physical onset of puberty to the age of 'being spoken for'.

What the Bible presents, and what you dogmatically claim (about teenagers), are two very different things.

Of course, you failed to recognize the context of this thread, just like you take Bible passages out of context and add in your own extra biblical contexts invented by fake rabbis of fake "jewish tradition." No different than the pedofile catholic priests.

There is no such mandated pedofile marriage in Deuteronomy. I don't care for your extra-biblical fake rabbinical nonsense that you added in yourself based on your pedofile traditions.

No, I am well aware of the context of the thread. I was posting a response to YOU directly, not to the OP.

Please try to understand people's intent.



I am not relying on a translation, but directly on the Hebrew. That's the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Textus Receptus.

Your blindness is quite sad, to be honest with you.

No, you are relying on extra-biblical fake definitions, made up by you and the likes of you. I do not worship some "concordance" or any so-called "theological dictionary." You are taking extra biblical things and assuming them to be biblical.

If I said, "I had sex with a female." and you think, "female could be a baby or old woman, he must mean baby" then claim I had sex with a baby, then you have added in your own BS. There is no mandated pedofile marriage in Deutoronomy. You added in YOUR OWN BS. The fact that you would read something like "sex with female" and automatically think "sex with female child" is testament to your own SICK PERVERT PEDOFILE MIND.

Everything I have written in this thread is in context of OP, if you reply to me, you reply to me in context of OP. Of course you would love to take things out of context and add in you own, then add in all sorts of fake "traditions" to further your pedofile agenda.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 07:16 AM

No, you are rudely mixing contexts. These are two separate discussions. You should be able to see that, to have sensible conversations with people.



Weyoun, I'm sorry to say you're an idiot.

I just showed you a litany of passages IN THE OLD TESTAMENT where the Hebrew word na'ar/na'arah is used to refer to known-children.

There are many more.
It is primarily - almost exclusively - used that way in the Bible itself.

i.e. You don't even need to reference external Hebrew scholarship to see that.

Again you deflect, evade, and deny what the Bible presents.

Or do you really believe all the girls in the Bible were 18+ when married? Goodness that's silly.

And if not, then why was it never addressed by God as inappropriate- not even once.
Name a single passage, Weyoun. It's not there.

There are passages condemning lying, divorce, theft, etc. But child marriage? It was (again) required in certain situations.

Again, making up your own BS. You are the one mixing contexts here. The context of this thread has always been OP context. You try to "muddy the watters" by mixing unrelated things into it. You have a habit of this. You even admit you mix contexts in the Bible as well, taking context of one passage and applying to another, all so you can make up some FAKE BS of mandated child marriage. Bible says Christians are children of God, does that mean all Christian sex is child sex? All Christians are pedofilie then? Of course not! But by your reasoning it would be. Enough of your nonsense.

If I said "I had sex with a hot chick" do you in your pervert mind imagine me having sex with a baby chicken on fire? Surely chick refers to baby chicken in one usage, so it must refer to baby chicken everywhere? So you would automatically imagine bestiality if I talk about having sex wiht a "chick." Only a sick perverted mind would think that. You are the one with context-mixing issues here.

Just because some children are referred to as X, doesn't mean X always refers to children. You sick pedofile ASSUME and IMAGINE sex with children every twisted chance you can get!

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 07:45 AM

Good grief, man.

What is your IQ, 60? I don't usually insult people, but you're really slow here.

Humans learn their native language by induction. It's called inductive learning.
It means learning what a word means by observing it's usage in different contexts.

Na'ar (male). Na'arah (female).

Throughout the Bible its usage is to refer to children.

I'm saying that's how you can learn what the word means - from within the Bible itself - without even referencing extra-biblical scholarship.

Fixed, sry.

It can refer to child in one context but not another. Just because in one context does not imply it is in every context. You need to put down your extra biblical "condcordances" and "dictionary" and seek the Holy Spirit. The fact that you have to pollute different and unrelated contexts together, use a bunch of extra-biblical nonsense, and use all sorts of mental and lingual gymnastics to justify your pedofile sickness, proves you are adding BS to the Bible that simply isn't there.

If I said "I had sex with a hot chick" do you in your pervert mind imagine me having sex with a baby chicken on fire? Surely chick refers to baby chicken in one usage, so it must refer to baby chicken everywhere? So you would automatically imagine bestiality if I talk about having sex wiht a "chick." Only a sick perverted mind would think that.

Just because some children are referred to as X, doesn't mean X always refers to children. You sick pedofile ASSUME and IMAGINE sex with children every twisted chance you can get!

Last Edited by Weyoun on 10/31/2019 07:54 AM

You realize thats probably MILLIONS of people. It was on Porhub for fucks sake. They are supposed to moderate, how they fuck is some random person supposed to know her age. You people are fucking stupid.