Nuclear mortars!?!?!?! Shit's gettin' crazy man. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77074699 ![]() 11/15/2019 02:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weyoun
User ID: 77989510 ![]() 11/15/2019 02:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4773771 ![]() 11/15/2019 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4773771 ![]() 11/15/2019 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ThePaleOne
traded his horse for a white van User ID: 76355513 ![]() 11/15/2019 04:34 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stationary artillery ...is pretty much a suicide commando today. Fire the first volley and get countered 5 minutes later. If you do indirect fire .. do it right. Artillery today must be shoot and scoot or else you are dead. Life is a 100% deadly sexually transmitted disease. Life is to short to be a slave, leave the plantation, go: [link to www.goingyourownway.com] |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stationary artillery ...is pretty much a suicide commando today. Quoting: ThePaleOne Fire the first volley and get countered 5 minutes later. If you do indirect fire .. do it right. Artillery today must be shoot and scoot or else you are dead. I was infantry. I know a little bit about tactics but this... Man, this is fucking ludacris. |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stationary artillery ...is pretty much a suicide commando today. Quoting: ThePaleOne Fire the first volley and get countered 5 minutes later. If you do indirect fire .. do it right. Artillery today must be shoot and scoot or else you are dead. I was infantry. I know a little bit about tactics but this... Man, this is fucking ludacris. It's like going after a fly with an AT-4. |
Bodiless![]() Senior Forum Moderator 11/15/2019 05:43 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weyoun
User ID: 77989510 ![]() 11/15/2019 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stationary artillery ...is pretty much a suicide commando today. Quoting: ThePaleOne Fire the first volley and get countered 5 minutes later. If you do indirect fire .. do it right. Artillery today must be shoot and scoot or else you are dead. I was infantry. I know a little bit about tactics but this... Man, this is fucking ludacris. One man's ludarcris is another man's genius. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77917930 ![]() 11/15/2019 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KonspiracyKitty
User ID: 75639580 ![]() 11/15/2019 07:03 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In the 1950's and 1960's, the United States had lots of low-yield nuclear stuff. Artillery and bombs, a short-range recoilless rifle; things colloquially known as 'tactical nukes'. Then nuclear weaponry below a certain yield was banned to lower the risk of nukes being employed in warfare. Russia was a signatory to this ban. However, while looking this up I came across a lot of news stories from May 2019 suggesting Russia may be carrying out banned nuclear testing with low-yield weapons. So that's not good. But like people said, the artillery piece here is going to be the recipient of a lot of counter-battery fire if the Russian employ this thing against any professional military. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77505897 ![]() 11/15/2019 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72983521 ![]() 11/15/2019 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In the 1950's and 1960's, the United States had lots of low-yield nuclear stuff. Artillery and bombs, a short-range recoilless rifle; things colloquially known as 'tactical nukes'. Quoting: KonspiracyKitty Then nuclear weaponry below a certain yield was banned to lower the risk of nukes being employed in warfare. Russia was a signatory to this ban. However, while looking this up I came across a lot of news stories from May 2019 suggesting Russia may be carrying out banned nuclear testing with low-yield weapons. So that's not good. But like people said, the artillery piece here is going to be the recipient of a lot of counter-battery fire if the Russian employ this thing against any professional military. If it's lobbing nukes at advancing armor columns, it only needs to fire a couple nuke rounds. Mission accomplished. It's not like they have hundreds of rounds on trucks like regular artillery or mlrs. Russian tactic of envelopement is ideal for low yield nukes. It's stupid to even speculate the US has a chance. All those former Warsaw Pact NATO members ate still on the Russian power grid and can be shutdown with the flip of a switch. That band the fact that NATO is infiltrated top to bottom with Russian spies. |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ver1tas
Truth Monger User ID: 72491132 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:03 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Irredeemable
Gun-Toting Deplorable User ID: 78155047 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:06 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77566109 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Twogun40
(OP) User ID: 23089589 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78130052 ![]() 11/15/2019 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just like us... The Ruskies have had better since the 1970's [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] 20 miles range for the missiles. 3 minutes to fire. Even better: ISKANDER-M [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] 310 miles range Warhead 480–700 kg (1,060–1,540 lb) thermonuclear weapon, High explosive fragmentation, submunition, penetration, fuel-air explosive, EMP[5][6] In November 2016, the Russian military announced that the modernisation of the Iskander-M System was under way.[11] A number of countries were reported to have shown interest in purchasing the export version of Iskander, but such possibility was only announced in early February 2017.[18] The United States has argued that the cruise missile version SSC-8 R-500 Iskander-K is in violation of the INF Treaty because its estimated range is beyond 500 km.[21] So... MGM-140 ATACMS In March 2016, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon announced they would offer a missile to meet the U.S. Army's Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF) requirement to replace the ATACMS. The missile will use advanced propulsion to fly faster and further (originally out to 310 miles (500 km))[19] while also being thinner and sleeker, increasing loadout to two per pod, doubling the number able to be carried by M270 MLRS and M142 HIMARS launchers.[20][21] Lockheed and Raytheon will test-fire their submissions for the renamed Precision Strike Missile (PRSM) program in 2019, with the selected weapon planned to achieve Initial Operational Capability in 2023; the initial PRSM will only be able to hit stationary targets on land, but later versions will track moving targets on land and sea.[22] With the United States withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, the range of the PRSM will be increased beyond the '499 km' limitation previously placed upon it by the treaty.[23] [link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Mental Case
User ID: 78136072 ![]() 11/15/2019 11:03 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Man, this is fucking ludacris. ----------------- Say you were one foot soldier making a stand against 50 enemy tanks to save a town full of women and children. You wouldn't find it so ludacris. If I am going to be damned...I am going to be damned for who I really am! |