Prove or disprove FLAT EARTH

And now we have hit the cognitive dissonance wall.

you're just a troll, aren't you? First, I didn't use it as proof. I just pointed out that you had no clue what it was. Second, as it depends on rotation and varies based on distance from the equator in a manner consistent with a globe surface it DOES point to a globe surface.

And pointing out that you were unable to read what was written and tried to put words in my mouth is NOT arguing semantics, it is pointing out you're a liar and a troll.

Why because I refuse to accept scientific dogma?

Tesla did the same thing and look what happened to him.

And the burden of proof that the RADAR doesn't work is on you.

One dude gets screwed in the AC/DC war, who's public theories were mostly disproven, and he's the martyr for your science is woowoo cause?



Coriolis effect is even demostratable when you shoot your turkey, but still not good enough for you.

Get in an Airplane and observe the curvature.

It is so cool how you have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you see nothing but "outer-space" from either side of the plane.


Miles squared X 8 inches
one foot = .000189394 miles
1 mile 5.33 ft. .12626 mile
6 miles 24 ft.
10 miles 66.666 ft. .2626 miles
100 miles 6,666.66 ft. 1.626 miles
1000 miles 666,666 ft. 12.2625 miles

So on a view of a horizon that stretches dozens of miles in each direction we easily see the Earth curving away and down dozens of feet on both sides.


That's why I say we live on a ball!

Prove angle of incidence? Are you on crack? It is a known fact. Put a panel perpendicular to an energy source and it receives more than if at an angle. Sorry you never paid attention to the world.

Ok so then that means the sun's rays aren't coming in parallel as we are told by erastothenes. That means his calculations were wrong. how does it feel to step into my traps?

And I was talking about through the DAY. Please read what it written and not what you wish was written.

Ok it will work during the day as well, provided you are at a high enough altitude. Still the fact remains i it changes size AT ALL during the day or year, just disproves the idea it's 93 million miles away, again.

I've done the trigonometry for the Moon myself. Still worked. You just have to measure the angle in the sky at the same time as another separated observer and do the math. Still works.
And the burden of proof that the RADAR doesn't work is on you.

show me one trigonometry formula and your "known" values. Also the burden of proof is on me? So by your logic any woman who claims to have been raped is right by default, it's up to those who say she wasn't raped to prove it?

I've done the trigonometry for the Moon myself. Still worked. You just have to measure the angle in the sky at the same time as another separated observer and do the math. Still works.

You call me a troll yet you do exactly what I said you would, you use Coriolis effect as a proof of globe earth.

You just contradicted yourself about 3 times yet you call me the troll.

At least i'm being consistent.

I've been in one.

Looks flat as far as I can see and the horizon comes up to eye level, no matter how high up you are.

If the earth's surface was curving away then the horizon would be much lower, not at eye level.

Damn it must be sad to be this brainwashed.

What trap? As the world is a globe, not all the surface is perpendicular to the sun. Or are you really that stupid?


but the suns rays are coming in parellel, and from our perspective on ground the earth is flat, the curvature is so sublte that it shouldn't matter.


Wrong. It does not change size throughout the day. It only changes slightly throughout the year as as already mentioned elsewhere in the post, the Sun is a few percent farther or closer away.


you are wrong, it's easily demonstrable. Have you gone on top of a mountain and taken pics during the day with a solar filter? No you haven't.


You are either a really bad troll or just extremely stupid. The known values would be the distance between the observers and the angles measured. Since you've proved you are a troll multiple times in this post alone there is no point in digging up the information which you'll just dismiss anyway.

And you proved you either don't understand the burden of proof or are still just trolling.

In your example the burden of proof would be on the accuser, the woman who claims to have been raped. Just like the burden of proof is on you claiming that RADAR doesn't work.

ok so your prerogative is just blindly believe in big science, whatever they say, without question. So cool, that's what you want to do. well I want to question it, and I have good reasons for doing so. So if you are simply going to blindly believe big science why are you sitting here arguing with me. You aren't going to convince me to change my mind so it's beginning to look like you are the troll sir.

It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy



But I bet you won't even try.

Okay Genius...
As proven by cool things like the Hubble Space Telescope and even Space Faring Probes to other Planets in our Solar System.

The Earth is a Round Sphere
Mars and Jupiter are Round Spherical Masses
The Moon is a Round Sphere Orbiting Earth in a Spherical, Orderly, Predictable Path.
That is All

River prove we live on a ball.


You see rivers sometimes run uphill.

That's why Dams do not work well.

All standing water is convex.

People go out and measure the curve in the water. It's so dam cool.

third time I've posted this :in the interest of educating the flattys.
this professor lays it out with simple diagrams and simple language









and

...

What trap? As the world is a globe, not all the surface is perpendicular to the sun. Or are you really that stupid?


but the suns rays are coming in parellel, and from our perspective on ground the earth is flat, the curvature is so sublte that it shouldn't matter.

...

Wrong. It does not change size throughout the day. It only changes slightly throughout the year as as already mentioned elsewhere in the post, the Sun is a few percent farther or closer away.


you are wrong, it's easily demonstrable. Have you gone on top of a mountain and taken pics during the day with a solar filter? No you haven't.

...

You are either a really bad troll or just extremely stupid. The known values would be the distance between the observers and the angles measured. Since you've proved you are a troll multiple times in this post alone there is no point in digging up the information which you'll just dismiss anyway.

And you proved you either don't understand the burden of proof or are still just trolling.

In your example the burden of proof would be on the accuser, the woman who claims to have been raped. Just like the burden of proof is on you claiming that RADAR doesn't work.

ok so your prerogative is just blindly believe in big science, whatever they say, without question. So cool, that's what you want to do. well I want to question it, and I have good reasons for doing so. So if you are simply going to blindly believe big science why are you sitting here arguing with me. You aren't going to convince me to change my mind so it's beginning to look like you are the troll sir.

yea how hard is it to slightly lift that device up over the horizon?

what a crock.

anyway this was fun.

gonna go enjoy my day on this flat motionless earth.

toodles

...

And what you said has nothing to do with angle of incidence.


...

Have you? Prove it.

...

"big science" is repeatable, testable, and consistent. Nothing blind about that. You haven't shown good reasons to question how RADAR works, nor have you shown any understanding. All you've shown is how you don't understand the burden of proof and that you're bad at trolling.

you keep going on about radar but i've provided many other examples to prove my point that are being ignored. Go on repeat the lunar ranging experiment, i'll be back to check to see if you were able to

You really are a moran. If the horizon truly rose to eye level as you claim then it wouldn't matter how much you lifted it. You don't even understand your own lies. Just further proof that flatties don't understand the subject they argue against.
Thanks for the humor!

it's a tube with liquid.

If i was making the video and I wanted to prove my point I would just hold it up a little higher than the horizon.

not my fault you are so blinded by your science religion you can't question it

it's a tube with liquid.

If i was making the video and I wanted to prove my point I would just hold it up a little higher than the horizon.

not my fault you are so blinded by your science religion you can't question it