...

And what you said has nothing to do with angle of incidence.


...

Have you? Prove it.

...

"big science" is repeatable, testable, and consistent. Nothing blind about that. You haven't shown good reasons to question how RADAR works, nor have you shown any understanding. All you've shown is how you don't understand the burden of proof and that you're bad at trolling.

you keep going on about radar but i've provided many other examples to prove my point that are being ignored. Go on repeat the lunar ranging experiment, i'll be back to check to see if you were able to