Not only shooped..

The Queen to my memory has NEVER been pictured without a hat (public duty--meaning if she's in a car she's headed to somewhere official)...although she has been seen in sunglasses it is rare.

But the obvious shoop is obvious is that whomever that is is shooped IN FRONT of the screen that is used to cars to separate the back seat passenger from the people driving--that is so fucking obvious I cannot imagine people falling for it. It's such a bad shoop that the wires of the screen are literally running through the head and it makes it look like she's holding a gun on the driver.

SO why suddenly is the media pushing this? Revenge on the BRF for not letting them go full on nuclear on the Great Whore of Britain Meghan Markle?...timing is everything--supposedly the media has a dossier that is massive that would tank Markle and it is suspected that the BRF is asking them to hold off blasting the whore until the blackmail is neutralized. Andy probably fucked Markle when she was a yacht girl and ALL of her horrific behavior from faking a pregnancy to merching, to making shitty documentaries has NOT been put a stop to because she's blackmailing them. Andrew coming out and falling on his sword--is part of the neutralization--IE blackmail becomes useless when you confess.

Also I find it strange that conspiracytards do not apply the same strict measures when assessing information regarding people they "hate"...why isn't anyone asking questions like "isn't it odd that someone was there to photograph Andy at this exact time?" Why? As hated as BIBI is (with good reason) no one asked "isn't it odd that Bibi blasts a photo of his political rival near Epstein's NY mansion yet fail to ask who took the photo and why?"

Come on GLP--you can do better than that--even if you DO believe the Queen is a baby eating lizard.

(((WHO))) was stationed outside Epstein's house to photograph anyone going in and out? WHY have no photos of Bill Clinton et all been leaked? What is the agenda? WHY is Andrew being targeted--for his sparse visits--versus Clinton's many many visits--so many that Epstein had a portrait made of him (wearing a dress like Hillary's and red shoes--obviously making fun of Clinton's cuckery with his wife)...

Andrew is guilty of influence selling and absolutely of an affair with that dark haired girl...(she is the daughter of a big OZ politician) but IS he guilty of anything else? Why do they want you to believe that? (((WHO))) took that photo (apparently at great distance) of Andrew and Epstein walking in a part?

Destroying the BRF destroys a unifying SYMBOL of the UK...why would (((ANYONE))) want to destroy that symbol? Does Soros ring a bell? BREXIT? (((WHO))) would want to stop Brexit?

Come on people, drop your programmed prejudices and back your faces away from the mirror and have a look at the 40k foot view here.