The Temperance Movement and Prohibition Was Pushed For By Leftists and Fabian Socialists | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 03:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76273531 United Kingdom 12/17/2019 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It kind of reminds me of how Democrats now try to pretend it was Republicans who founded the KKK, when it was them. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74628864 Freemasons founded the KKK, Albert Pike, along with N'nai B'rith. Unless I am mistaken. "Historian Eric Foner observed: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to reverse the interlocking changes sweeping over the South during Reconstruction: to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.[64] To that end they worked to curb the education, economic advancement, voting rights, and right to keep and bear arms of blacks." [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "The Klan's activity infiltrated the Democratic Party's campaign for the presidential election of 1868. Prominent ex-Confederates, including Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Klan, and South Carolina's Wade Hampton, attended as delegates at the 1868 Democratic Convention, held at Tammany Hall headquarters at 141 East 14th Street in New York City.[157] Forrest rode to the convention on a train that stopped in a small Northern town along the way, where he faced a protester who wanted to fight the "damned butcher" of Fort Pillow.[158] Former Governor of New York Horatio Seymour was nominated as the Democratic presidential candidate, while Forrest's friend, Frank Blair, Jr. was nominated as the Democratic vice presidential candidate, Seymour's running mate. [159] The Seymour-Blair Democratic ticket's campaign slogan was: "Our Ticket, Our Motto, This Is a White Man's Country; Let White Men Rule."" [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75060351 United States 12/17/2019 05:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Novosel
User ID: 78049598 Croatia 12/17/2019 05:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What's also interesting is that I don't think that "our bodies, our choice" means what many people, including pro-abortionists who often use it as a slogan today, think it means. I think you'd have to also put that into the socialistic context of those who engineered the term as well, and then look to how the Chinese control their population in order to truly get it. Northam's comments start to touch upon the truth about what was meant by the social engineers when they coined it. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What's also interesting is that I don't think that "our bodies, our choice" means what many people, including pro-abortionists who often use it as a slogan today, think it means. I think you'd have to also put that into the socialistic context of those who engineered the term as well, and then look to how the Chinese control their population in order to truly get it. Northam's comments start to touch upon the truth about what was meant by the social engineers when they coined it. The early American eugenicists surely knew the meaning. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78073861 Canada 12/17/2019 05:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's bullshit. In the late 1800's virtually the entire liquor business had been taken over by jewish interests. In their quest to cut costs and make more money, they started mixing up concoctions that looked and tasted like whiskey and rum but were full of poisons like turpentine and antifreeze. They started making people sick and killing them. You didn't have to put them in a barrel for 4 years. You could sell that fake shit right away. Saving the jewish criminal the storage costs. The temperance movement was a response to that. Prior to the jewish takeover, nobody had a problem with liquor, real liquor, that didn't even give you a hangover, much less destroy your liver. The anit-semetic aspect of it has been hidden from us for over a hundred years to protect jewish liquor interests that are still killing people with their phony rot today. They don't want you to know the real reasons behind it, because like with every other cancer eating at the heatr of your nation, it always comes back to that shitty thieving tribe. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78073861 Canada 12/17/2019 06:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When have you ever heard a lib say, he didn't approve of drinking alcohol? I've never heard it. Liquor in your country serves the same purpose. Though now they've got better stuff than that, like Oxys, space you out twice as good and kill you even quicker, produced by... the jewish Sackler family. What a surprise. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's bullshit. In the late 1800's virtually the entire liquor business had been taken over by jewish interests. In their quest to cut costs and make more money, they started mixing up concoctions that looked and tasted like whiskey and rum but were full of poisons like turpentine and antifreeze. They started making people sick and killing them. You didn't have to put them in a barrel for 4 years. You could sell that fake shit right away. Saving the jewish criminal the storage costs. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78073861 The temperance movement was a response to that. Prior to the jewish takeover, nobody had a problem with liquor, real liquor, that didn't even give you a hangover, much less destroy your liver. The anit-semetic aspect of it has been hidden from us for over a hundred years to protect jewish liquor interests that are still killing people with their phony rot today. They don't want you to know the real reasons behind it, because like with every other cancer eating at the heatr of your nation, it always comes back to that shitty thieving tribe. No, what you are saying is bullshit, because even if it were true, then regulation and punishment of those selling impure products, as well as allowing the free market to operate as intended would have effectively solved the problem that you describe. Nope, the movement was about the elimination and prohibition of all alcohol, not just impure and poisonous products. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Leftists always make sure there are ample liquor supplies. In the Soviet Union you couldn't buy bread, but there was always Vodka on the store shelves. Every communist knows it's easier to just down another glass and forget about how shitty they've made your life than it is to walk down to the commissar's office and drive a butcher knife into his belly button. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78073861 When have you ever heard a lib say, he didn't approve of drinking alcohol? I've never heard it. Liquor in your country serves the same purpose. Though now they've got better stuff than that, like Oxys, space you out twice as good and kill you even quicker, produced by... the jewish Sackler family. What a surprise. Maybe once the takeover has been complete, but if your goal is to disrupt and to destabilize a nation, as well as to build up organized crime syndicates in order to run black budget programs that will allow you to funnel more money into organizations and groups devoted to the cause, as well as an internal secret police program to supposedly fight these newly created organized criminal organizations, then prohibition is the ticket. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76273531 United Kingdom 12/17/2019 06:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It kind of reminds me of how Democrats now try to pretend it was Republicans who founded the KKK, when it was them. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74628864 Freemasons founded the KKK, Albert Pike, along with N'nai B'rith. Unless I am mistaken. "Historian Eric Foner observed: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to reverse the interlocking changes sweeping over the South during Reconstruction: to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.[64] To that end they worked to curb the education, economic advancement, voting rights, and right to keep and bear arms of blacks." [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "The Klan's activity infiltrated the Democratic Party's campaign for the presidential election of 1868. Prominent ex-Confederates, including Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Klan, and South Carolina's Wade Hampton, attended as delegates at the 1868 Democratic Convention, held at Tammany Hall headquarters at 141 East 14th Street in New York City.[157] Forrest rode to the convention on a train that stopped in a small Northern town along the way, where he faced a protester who wanted to fight the "damned butcher" of Fort Pillow.[158] Former Governor of New York Horatio Seymour was nominated as the Democratic presidential candidate, while Forrest's friend, Frank Blair, Jr. was nominated as the Democratic vice presidential candidate, Seymour's running mate. [159] The Seymour-Blair Democratic ticket's campaign slogan was: "Our Ticket, Our Motto, This Is a White Man's Country; Let White Men Rule."" [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] So... what are you trying to say? Other than a group, got involved with another. Perhaps blurring the lines between them. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 06:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It kind of reminds me of how Democrats now try to pretend it was Republicans who founded the KKK, when it was them. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74628864 Freemasons founded the KKK, Albert Pike, along with N'nai B'rith. Unless I am mistaken. "Historian Eric Foner observed: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to reverse the interlocking changes sweeping over the South during Reconstruction: to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.[64] To that end they worked to curb the education, economic advancement, voting rights, and right to keep and bear arms of blacks." [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "The Klan's activity infiltrated the Democratic Party's campaign for the presidential election of 1868. Prominent ex-Confederates, including Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Klan, and South Carolina's Wade Hampton, attended as delegates at the 1868 Democratic Convention, held at Tammany Hall headquarters at 141 East 14th Street in New York City.[157] Forrest rode to the convention on a train that stopped in a small Northern town along the way, where he faced a protester who wanted to fight the "damned butcher" of Fort Pillow.[158] Former Governor of New York Horatio Seymour was nominated as the Democratic presidential candidate, while Forrest's friend, Frank Blair, Jr. was nominated as the Democratic vice presidential candidate, Seymour's running mate. [159] The Seymour-Blair Democratic ticket's campaign slogan was: "Our Ticket, Our Motto, This Is a White Man's Country; Let White Men Rule."" [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] So... what are you trying to say? Other than a group, got involved with another. Perhaps blurring the lines between them. More like long term Democratic policy. Nice try. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76273531 United Kingdom 12/17/2019 06:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's bullshit. In the late 1800's virtually the entire liquor business had been taken over by jewish interests. In their quest to cut costs and make more money, they started mixing up concoctions that looked and tasted like whiskey and rum but were full of poisons like turpentine and antifreeze. They started making people sick and killing them. You didn't have to put them in a barrel for 4 years. You could sell that fake shit right away. Saving the jewish criminal the storage costs. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78073861 The temperance movement was a response to that. Prior to the jewish takeover, nobody had a problem with liquor, real liquor, that didn't even give you a hangover, much less destroy your liver. The anit-semetic aspect of it has been hidden from us for over a hundred years to protect jewish liquor interests that are still killing people with their phony rot today. They don't want you to know the real reasons behind it, because like with every other cancer eating at the heatr of your nation, it always comes back to that shitty thieving tribe. Shepherds lead the sheep on all sides. There may well have been rising issues with that. Why would you enemies waste that drive? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76273531 United Kingdom 12/17/2019 06:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76273531 Freemasons founded the KKK, Albert Pike, along with N'nai B'rith. Unless I am mistaken. "Historian Eric Foner observed: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to reverse the interlocking changes sweeping over the South during Reconstruction: to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.[64] To that end they worked to curb the education, economic advancement, voting rights, and right to keep and bear arms of blacks." [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "The Klan's activity infiltrated the Democratic Party's campaign for the presidential election of 1868. Prominent ex-Confederates, including Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Klan, and South Carolina's Wade Hampton, attended as delegates at the 1868 Democratic Convention, held at Tammany Hall headquarters at 141 East 14th Street in New York City.[157] Forrest rode to the convention on a train that stopped in a small Northern town along the way, where he faced a protester who wanted to fight the "damned butcher" of Fort Pillow.[158] Former Governor of New York Horatio Seymour was nominated as the Democratic presidential candidate, while Forrest's friend, Frank Blair, Jr. was nominated as the Democratic vice presidential candidate, Seymour's running mate. [159] The Seymour-Blair Democratic ticket's campaign slogan was: "Our Ticket, Our Motto, This Is a White Man's Country; Let White Men Rule."" [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] So... what are you trying to say? Other than a group, got involved with another. Perhaps blurring the lines between them. More like long term Democratic policy. Nice try. Seemingly asking you to clarify yourself is 'nice try'. Ok. Fine. Doesn't change the facts of who founded the KKK. So, 'nice try' right back at you. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 06:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74628864 "Historian Eric Foner observed: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to reverse the interlocking changes sweeping over the South during Reconstruction: to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.[64] To that end they worked to curb the education, economic advancement, voting rights, and right to keep and bear arms of blacks." [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "The Klan's activity infiltrated the Democratic Party's campaign for the presidential election of 1868. Prominent ex-Confederates, including Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Klan, and South Carolina's Wade Hampton, attended as delegates at the 1868 Democratic Convention, held at Tammany Hall headquarters at 141 East 14th Street in New York City.[157] Forrest rode to the convention on a train that stopped in a small Northern town along the way, where he faced a protester who wanted to fight the "damned butcher" of Fort Pillow.[158] Former Governor of New York Horatio Seymour was nominated as the Democratic presidential candidate, while Forrest's friend, Frank Blair, Jr. was nominated as the Democratic vice presidential candidate, Seymour's running mate. [159] The Seymour-Blair Democratic ticket's campaign slogan was: "Our Ticket, Our Motto, This Is a White Man's Country; Let White Men Rule."" [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] So... what are you trying to say? Other than a group, got involved with another. Perhaps blurring the lines between them. More like long term Democratic policy. Nice try. Seemingly asking you to clarify yourself is 'nice try'. Ok. Fine. Doesn't change the facts of who founded the KKK. So, 'nice try' right back at you. Ok. Where's your proof that Pike founded the KKK? Let's see it. Also it looks like Pike was a Democrat. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78073861 Canada 12/17/2019 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's bullshit. In the late 1800's virtually the entire liquor business had been taken over by jewish interests. In their quest to cut costs and make more money, they started mixing up concoctions that looked and tasted like whiskey and rum but were full of poisons like turpentine and antifreeze. They started making people sick and killing them. You didn't have to put them in a barrel for 4 years. You could sell that fake shit right away. Saving the jewish criminal the storage costs. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78073861 The temperance movement was a response to that. Prior to the jewish takeover, nobody had a problem with liquor, real liquor, that didn't even give you a hangover, much less destroy your liver. The anit-semetic aspect of it has been hidden from us for over a hundred years to protect jewish liquor interests that are still killing people with their phony rot today. They don't want you to know the real reasons behind it, because like with every other cancer eating at the heatr of your nation, it always comes back to that shitty thieving tribe. No, what you are saying is bullshit, because even if it were true, then regulation and punishment of those selling impure products, as well as allowing the free market to operate as intended would have effectively solved the problem that you describe. Nope, the movement was about the elimination and prohibition of all alcohol, not just impure and poisonous products. You have to understand, the American is a knee jerk idiot, always has been. He's constantly throwing out the baby with the bath water. Yup, the temperance people could have demanded the business be cleaned up and restored to sanity. But that isn't the knee jerk idiot American way, and it still isn't today. One guy uses a racial slur on facebook, next thing you know they're kicking people off calling a stock market crash, "Black Monday." I'm just telling you, It didn't come from leftists. Leftists have always wanted you drunk and stupid and high on drugs. Looking in another direction while they screw you in the ass. A sober man is dangerous to them. |
Ninbit
User ID: 76723511 United States 12/17/2019 06:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 07:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's bullshit. In the late 1800's virtually the entire liquor business had been taken over by jewish interests. In their quest to cut costs and make more money, they started mixing up concoctions that looked and tasted like whiskey and rum but were full of poisons like turpentine and antifreeze. They started making people sick and killing them. You didn't have to put them in a barrel for 4 years. You could sell that fake shit right away. Saving the jewish criminal the storage costs. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78073861 The temperance movement was a response to that. Prior to the jewish takeover, nobody had a problem with liquor, real liquor, that didn't even give you a hangover, much less destroy your liver. The anit-semetic aspect of it has been hidden from us for over a hundred years to protect jewish liquor interests that are still killing people with their phony rot today. They don't want you to know the real reasons behind it, because like with every other cancer eating at the heatr of your nation, it always comes back to that shitty thieving tribe. No, what you are saying is bullshit, because even if it were true, then regulation and punishment of those selling impure products, as well as allowing the free market to operate as intended would have effectively solved the problem that you describe. Nope, the movement was about the elimination and prohibition of all alcohol, not just impure and poisonous products. You have to understand, the American is a knee jerk idiot, always has been. He's constantly throwing out the baby with the bath water. Yup, the temperance people could have demanded the business be cleaned up and restored to sanity. But that isn't the knee jerk idiot American way, and it still isn't today. One guy uses a racial slur on facebook, next thing you know they're kicking people off calling a stock market crash, "Black Monday." I'm just telling you, It didn't come from leftists. Leftists have always wanted you drunk and stupid and high on drugs. Looking in another direction while they screw you in the ass. A sober man is dangerous to them. "When Susan Anthony, at eighty, went to hear Eugene Debs speak (twenty-five years before, he had gone to hear her speak, and they had not met since then), they clasped hands warmly, then had a brief exchange. She said, laughing: "Give us suffrage, and we'll give you socialism," Debs replied: "Give us socialism and we'll give you suffrage."" [link to www.historyisaweapon.com (secure)] "Anthony struggled to keep the paper [The Revolution] afloat, but without constant new infusions of cash from Train she couldn't make ends meet. Half of her potential subscribers had shunned her. The income from ads for sewing machines, life insurance and (ironically) corsets wasn't enough, either. The Revolution was sold to new proprietors and eventually folded completely. “It did amazing things while it was going on,” says Gordon. “They're meeting with people who were in the First International with Karl Marx. They are in touch with white and black reconstruction people in the south. . . . They have a British correspondent. There's letters coming in from Paris. If the money had come in, could they have kept this up? What would have happened?”" [link to www.smithsonianmag.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 07:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sounds like propaganda put out by the new "internationalists" to deflect attention from the communist connection, you know, their usual modus operandi, blame capitalism for what they themselves did. They were using Alinsky tactics before Alinsky. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 07:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But really how many American oil tycoons were really leftists and were tied at the hip with the banksters who funded the Russian Revolution? There still may be some truth in the charge, even if it were put out there as a limited hangout and to deflect blame from hitting the leftists responsible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74661623 United States 12/17/2019 08:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Prohibition as introduced in the Russian Empire in 1914 permitted the sale of hard liquor only in restaurants...Prohibition continued through the turmoil of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Russian Civil War, into the period of Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union until 1925." [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "What role did alcohol play in tsarist coups? Was Nicholas II's ill-fated prohibition a catalyst for the Bolshevik Revolution?" [link to global.oup.com (secure)] Were the leftists attempting to use American Prohibition to seed similar thoughts of communist revolution in America? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not so sure that they were pretending to have morals. More likely, the adherents of Marxism saw alcohol as a impediment to revolutionary action, as an instrument that the upper class was using to suppress revolutionary organization, and wanted to remove it as an impediment to their global movements, while using the chaos that such removals would cause in order to try foment the action needed for their revolutions in areas that they were targeting. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Prohibition in the United States in the early 20th Century was to the building of the surveillance state at that time what September 11th was to America for the building of a surveillance state in the early 21st century. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/17/2019 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76273531 United Kingdom 12/19/2019 03:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76273531 So... what are you trying to say? Other than a group, got involved with another. Perhaps blurring the lines between them. More like long term Democratic policy. Nice try. Seemingly asking you to clarify yourself is 'nice try'. Ok. Fine. Doesn't change the facts of who founded the KKK. So, 'nice try' right back at you. Ok. Where's your proof that Pike founded the KKK? Let's see it. Also it looks like Pike was a Democrat. Mm works that I could at one time more readily find, I cannot any more. Very well, I will concede that I cannot substantiate that he founded them. Good hunting, then I guess. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/19/2019 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seemingly asking you to clarify yourself is 'nice try'. Ok. Fine. Doesn't change the facts of who founded the KKK. So, 'nice try' right back at you. Ok. Where's your proof that Pike founded the KKK? Let's see it. Also it looks like Pike was a Democrat. Mm works that I could at one time more readily find, I cannot any more. Very well, I will concede that I cannot substantiate that he founded them. Good hunting, then I guess. It is interesting, because I seem to remember being able to find sources on that before as well. I am not saying you are wrong. It does look like he was affiliated with the Democrats, and he was definitely a member of the KKK. Definitely evil. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74628864 United States 12/21/2019 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |