Those whom choose to ink themselves are not worthy of your society humanity?

Or are they to be deemed lower class because of such?

If society humanity is so fragile that ink on someone skin causes issues, perhaps that society isn't worth such a name.

And perhaps those whom do make such a choice, choose NOT to be part of your society humanity.

Why is that wrong?


Ok let's substitute "society" for "humanity."

The tattoo epidemic is clearly a symptom of something. What that is exactly is what's up for debate.


Updated, but still the same questions.

Of all the MAJOR, GLARING issues we face on our rock, INK is a factor in treatment of another?

Priorities perhaps need to be re-examined?