Dr. Anthony Phan On Vaccines - Doctor Tearfully Apologizes To Parents

The parents are who I would listen to.they know their kids like no one else.

If he is, then why fuck them up with vaccines? Why not just let them starve? I know. He maka da money. on their death.

A few more facts:
The doctor touches on letters from Medicare and insurance companies asking doctors if they are prescribing certain medications.

Did you know that pediatricians who manage to give all of the mandated vaccines to each of their patients gets a check from BlueCross for 400.00. Consider the average pediatric practice has 1546 patients. If 200 2 year olds are 100 percent vaccinated that is a 40,000 per year check. Now it is easier to see why there are cases reported of physicians knowing one of their patients had a vaccine injury they still pressured parents to continue vaccine schedules. Also in the article, a catch, if a physicians practice does not have at least 63 percent of their patients vaccinated they lose the whole bonus.

From an article that has a copy of BlueCross' policy. Much less than 50 percent: "So how much money do doctors really make from vaccines? The average American pediatrician has 1546 patients, though some pediatricians see many more. The vast majority of those patients are very young, perhaps because children transition to a family physician or stop visiting the doctor at all as they grow up. As they table above explains, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays pediatricians $400 per fully vaccinated child. If your pediatrician has just 100 fully-vaccinated patients turning 2 this year, that’s $40,000. Yes, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000."
[link to wellnessandequality.com (secure)]

Last Edited by akaSuzanne on 01/12/2020 01:45 PM

Something has been different this yr with the flu vaccine. In three appts they have not asked us to give it to my child. Why are they not asking this year

keep them away from us too

The full vaccine movie online for free. If you haven't seen it yet, here you go. Edited to say someone posted this in another thread.
[link to vev.io (secure)]

Last Edited by akaSuzanne on 01/12/2020 02:10 PM

You forgot to mention all industry insiders and the whistle blowers in the movie that were former employees of the pharmaceutical industry. Their interviews is what made the movie so powerful. The parent interviews were also powerful (huge settlements) and were towards the end of the movie.

Last Edited by ShortStop on 01/12/2020 01:59 PM

This is one of the greatest threats to humanity.

Good find, OP.

Heads of cdc always go on to be CEO at pharma companies.you can verify this by looking it up.

This is absolutely brilliant - thanks for the post. Will
Share.

Note how they left him alone when he refused to consent, and mention God. It's all about us consenting to do their evil.

(Retired molecular biologist - I walked away from a 6-figure income developing GMOs - this physician is spot on.)

Let's see, what does the World Health Organization say at their recent Vaccine Safety summit (December)?


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Bombshell quotes from the WHO video.

"I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that that we really don't have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we're not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media. One should be able to give a very factual account of what exactly has happened and what the cause of that saw but in most cases there's some obfuscation at that level and and therefore there's less and less trust then in the system."

"...the science is the backbone. You can't re-purpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don't have the science that's relevant to the new problems, so we need much more investment in safety science."

"I give courses every year on how do you develop vaccines how do you make vaccines and the first lesson is while you're making your vaccine, if you can avoid using an adjuvant please do so. Lesson two is if you're going to use an adjuvant, use one that has a history of safety. And lesson three is if you're not going to do that think very carefully."

"I think one of the things that we really need to invest in are kind of better bio-markers, better mechanistic understanding of how these things work so we can better understand adverse events as they come up."

"We have a very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. I mean in medical school you're lucky if you have a half-day on vaccines, never mind keeping up to date with all this."



Last Edited by jackleson on 01/13/2020 01:26 AM

Pray for and watch New Jersey today. It is probably gonna be lit, they are trying to pass their bill today to only allow religious exemptions for private schools, not public (this was their compromise...was gonna be removed for everyone but they settled on this segregated idea that has just pissed off MORE people). Pray there is no victory for Pharma in NJ.

What if it isn't that I "watched a video or two on youtube"?

What if it's that I read the package insert with the ingredients and the list of so-called "side effects"?

What if I decided based on the principle of informed consent that having been informed of the listed so-called "side effects", I didn't want any part of any vaccine?

Do you reject the principle of informed consent?

Do you think people should take any shot that any doctor or pharmaceutical employee says they should? Any shot? Just take it without question?

Do you have any place where you would draw the line? The vaccine injury courts paid out 4 billion dollars in 4 years, and that was after rejecting 2/3rds of the cases.

If it was someone close to you that was one of those cases of damage, injury or death from a vaccine, admitted and proved in court and paid for, would you go down that road yourself after seeing the possible outcome?

Do you think that any shot, no matter what is in it, should be required by law and mandatory? Who gets to decide? Does anyone have the right to exercise the right to informed consent? Or is there no more principle of consent to medical invasion. If a doctor wants to do something to you, to inject a substance into your blood, you're not even allowed to ask what it is? They have total rights over your body? Is that how you want it to work?

Where do you draw the line?

this issue has been obfuscated and shilled ot the ass

but it really comes down to whether you think the government at any time should be able to inject you with whatever they want involuntarily


the way the government behaves, i'd say if you aren't saying 'no thanks' ...