When you put out alerts and name every area where quakes are known to happen it's easy to get it right at least 50% of the time. He is just one of many on the net that do this. I can predict that by the end of the month we can expect a 6+ quake in one of the following areas: Japan, Phillipines, NZ, Kamchatka, Alaska, Cascadia, Mexico, Central America, Chile, Argentina. I have named all of the areas where big quakes occur on the ring of fire. The chance of me being right is 50/50. If a quake of that magnitude happens in one of these areas I can then generate clicks and subscribes because I "got it right". If I get it wrong, I just move on and make some more broad predictions until I get it right. Nobody ever talks about the times the predictions don't happen, just the few times they were right.

Dutch is and always has been all about the clicks, but he should be allowed to say what he wants because censorship is a slippery slope. Educated people that use their brain and have some critical thinking skills can distinguish between truth and a clickbait scam and avoid wasting their time clicking on that material. The rest of the public that needs to be led will click on click bait and Taylor Swift PR stories. Banning and censoring just gives them the excuse they need to drum up sympathy and crowd funding campaigns to continue their "important work".