72% of Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial | |
President R@pist User ID: 76967933 Hong Kong 01/23/2020 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Larry D. Croc Very simple, it was what THAT session of the Senate CHOSE to do, it in no way obligates THIS session to do the same thing. What part of this don't you get? It's really not that hard to comprehend...if comprehension is your goal... That's why there will be a vote on witnesses and documents later in the trial. I'm just stating what 72% of Americans want. Read what you posted. They want witnesses who have FIRSTHAND knowledge of what they allege took place. People who were on the call, who were directly in the room. Oddly enough there weren't a lot of people called by the Dems that met that criteria. I'm going to put all of this to rest for all of you. In the beginning of this impeachment trial, Chuck Schumer introduced amendments to the Impeachment which were voted DOWN, to ask the Senate to call witnesses and provide documents. Since the Senate knows what the constitution requires them to do, they told the Dems to fuck off. Do your own fucking job, they siad. We the Senate are only the Jury. Now why do you think they all did that? IT'S NOT THEIR FUCKING JOB, DUMBASSES! It's the burden lain upon the accuser to provide evidence, including witnesses, to prosecute a defender. END OF FUCKING STORY. Can they call witnesses; YES. Will they? Apparently not; so are your agreements a fucking requisite? Have they been a requisite the entire trial? Nope... :meerkat: Nick® It's hilarious to watch GLP ret@rds claim to know how impeachment works and speak with authority. The Senate runs a trial, it's nothing to do with the House other than the indictment. A trial has witnesses and evidence presented, period. |
tkwasny
User ID: 71641081 United States 01/23/2020 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39516942 United States 01/23/2020 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nickadimus
User ID: 77113012 United States 01/23/2020 10:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
NeD RyeRsON
User ID: 58900495 United States 01/23/2020 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: NDFarm That's why there will be a vote on witnesses and documents later in the trial. I'm just stating what 72% of Americans want. Read what you posted. They want witnesses who have FIRSTHAND knowledge of what they allege took place. People who were on the call, who were directly in the room. Oddly enough there weren't a lot of people called by the Dems that met that criteria. I'm going to put all of this to rest for all of you. In the beginning of this impeachment trial, Chuck Schumer introduced amendments to the Impeachment which were voted DOWN, to ask the Senate to call witnesses and provide documents. Since the Senate knows what the constitution requires them to do, they told the Dems to fuck off. Do your own fucking job, they siad. We the Senate are only the Jury. Now why do you think they all did that? IT'S NOT THEIR FUCKING JOB, DUMBASSES! It's the burden lain upon the accuser to provide evidence, including witnesses, to prosecute a defender. END OF FUCKING STORY. Can they call witnesses; YES. Will they? Apparently not; so are your agreements a fucking requisite? Have they been a requisite the entire trial? Nope... Nick® It's hilarious to watch GLP ret@rds claim to know how impeachment works and speak with authority. The Senate runs a trial, it's nothing to do with the House other than the indictment. A trial has witnesses and evidence presented, period. Fuck off Bill Clinton. You learned the hard way didn’t you? Bing! |
NDFarm
(OP) User ID: 78332101 United States 01/23/2020 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~kpm~
User ID: 75950402 United States 01/23/2020 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: NDFarm That's why there will be a vote on witnesses and documents later in the trial. I'm just stating what 72% of Americans want. Read what you posted. They want witnesses who have FIRSTHAND knowledge of what they allege took place. People who were on the call, who were directly in the room. Oddly enough there weren't a lot of people called by the Dems that met that criteria. I'm going to put all of this to rest for all of you. In the beginning of this impeachment trial, Chuck Schumer introduced amendments to the Impeachment which were voted DOWN, to ask the Senate to call witnesses and provide documents. Since the Senate knows what the constitution requires them to do, they told the Dems to fuck off. Do your own fucking job, they siad. We the Senate are only the Jury. Now why do you think they all did that? IT'S NOT THEIR FUCKING JOB, DUMBASSES! It's the burden lain upon the accuser to provide evidence, including witnesses, to prosecute a defender. END OF FUCKING STORY. Can they call witnesses; YES. Will they? Apparently not; so are your agreements a fucking requisite? Have they been a requisite the entire trial? Nope... Nick® It's hilarious to watch GLP ret@rds claim to know how impeachment works and speak with authority. The Senate runs a trial, it's nothing to do with the House other than the indictment. A trial has witnesses and evidence presented, period. They want to call NEW witnesses that were not interviewed in the house hearing They didn’t want to wait for some witnesses because they said they had to impeach him quickly, to effect the 2020 election It’s not the senate’s responsibility to call new witnesses because the house didn’t want to do their homework If their case is so air tight then the witnesses they did call during their hearing should suffice They can’t have it both ways, you can’t say we have concrete proof then say but we need more witnesses to prove it ~With forethought and malice Whitless enacted an EO giving nursing homes immunity from wrongful death prosecutions, forced them to take in infected patients and is responsible for over 6500+ nursing home deaths~ |
JJ Johns
J to the 3rd User ID: 78129343 Switzerland 01/23/2020 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since many of you don't grasp this concept, let me try and help. It was the HOUSE'S job to produce witness testimony in the HOUSE. It's not the senate's job to provide the HOUSE with witnesses, or data of any sort. Think of the Senate as like the jury. The Lawyers take the data to the court and try it all across the floor for the Jury to make their decision. Imagine the defense lawyers asking the Jury to produce witness and documents???? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? It's a joke. Every single senator knows it. Why in the fuwk do you think Dianne Fienstien walked off last night? She ain't stupid... Nick® yes, i agree with everything you wrote here. but, what's this about feinstein walking off/out? didn't hear about this. thanks . . No clotshot, NEVER! . Mad as hell! . |
~kpm~
User ID: 75950402 United States 01/23/2020 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ALSO 72% of Americans actually DON'T understand why witnesses was what the house does and the senate actually gets to defend Trump on those house findings. Quoting: CountryWise Senate Trial is NOT for finding more findings... 100% of Democrats are actually COUNTING on the fact that Americans DON'T understand the Impeachment process... LOOKS like its working well for them... Yep, you are 100% spot on! ~With forethought and malice Whitless enacted an EO giving nursing homes immunity from wrongful death prosecutions, forced them to take in infected patients and is responsible for over 6500+ nursing home deaths~ |
~kpm~
User ID: 75950402 United States 01/23/2020 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since many of you don't grasp this concept, let me try and help. It was the HOUSE'S job to produce witness testimony in the HOUSE. It's not the senate's job to provide the HOUSE with witnesses, or data of any sort. Think of the Senate as like the jury. The Lawyers take the data to the court and try it all across the floor for the Jury to make their decision. Imagine the defense lawyers asking the Jury to produce witness and documents???? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? It's a joke. Every single senator knows it. Why in the fuwk do you think Dianne Fienstien walked off last night? She ain't stupid... Nick® yes, i agree with everything you wrote here. but, what's this about feinstein walking off/out? didn't hear about this. thanks Madcow and Hayes blasted their liberal heroes for falling asleep and walking out telling them to resign ASAP Last Edited by ~kpm~ on 01/23/2020 10:52 AM ~With forethought and malice Whitless enacted an EO giving nursing homes immunity from wrongful death prosecutions, forced them to take in infected patients and is responsible for over 6500+ nursing home deaths~ |
Nickadimus
User ID: 77113012 United States 01/23/2020 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Larry D. Croc Read what you posted. They want witnesses who have FIRSTHAND knowledge of what they allege took place. People who were on the call, who were directly in the room. Oddly enough there weren't a lot of people called by the Dems that met that criteria. I'm going to put all of this to rest for all of you. In the beginning of this impeachment trial, Chuck Schumer introduced amendments to the Impeachment which were voted DOWN, to ask the Senate to call witnesses and provide documents. Since the Senate knows what the constitution requires them to do, they told the Dems to fuck off. Do your own fucking job, they siad. We the Senate are only the Jury. Now why do you think they all did that? IT'S NOT THEIR FUCKING JOB, DUMBASSES! It's the burden lain upon the accuser to provide evidence, including witnesses, to prosecute a defender. END OF FUCKING STORY. Can they call witnesses; YES. Will they? Apparently not; so are your agreements a fucking requisite? Have they been a requisite the entire trial? Nope... Nick® It's hilarious to watch GLP ret@rds claim to know how impeachment works and speak with authority. The Senate runs a trial, it's nothing to do with the House other than the indictment. A trial has witnesses and evidence presented, period. They want to call NEW witnesses that were not interviewed in the house hearing They didn’t want to wait for some witnesses because they said they had to impeach him quickly, to effect the 2020 election It’s not the senate’s responsibility to call new witnesses because the house didn’t want to do their homework If their case is so air tight then the witnesses they did call during their hearing should suffice They can’t have it both ways, you can’t say we have concrete proof then say but we need more witnesses to prove it Thanks kpm. I'm fukn done trying to help. These fucksticks can disseminate false data all they want. I'm done... Nick® Pure Life-Get it on... |
Bonefortoona
User ID: 72180110 United States 01/23/2020 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
QCluminati
User ID: 71962198 Canada 01/23/2020 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nickadimus
User ID: 77113012 United States 01/23/2020 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since many of you don't grasp this concept, let me try and help. It was the HOUSE'S job to produce witness testimony in the HOUSE. It's not the senate's job to provide the HOUSE with witnesses, or data of any sort. Think of the Senate as like the jury. The Lawyers take the data to the court and try it all across the floor for the Jury to make their decision. Imagine the defense lawyers asking the Jury to produce witness and documents???? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? It's a joke. Every single senator knows it. Why in the fuwk do you think Dianne Fienstien walked off last night? She ain't stupid... Nick® yes, i agree with everything you wrote here. but, what's this about feinstein walking off/out? didn't hear about this. thanks Madcow and Hayes blasted their liberal heroes for falling asleep and walking out telling them to resign ASAP Kpm. What are your thoughts on this. I have a freaking wild notion flying around my head...What if this is all "purposeful"? Here's what I mean. Is it possible Barr and Durham have so much felonious dirt on the DNC, that a deal was struck. The deal was, you all don't get deaded, but you go on national television and collapse the Democratic Party on live air... This would explain the shit you just "can't make up"...the sheer lunacy? Nick® Pure Life-Get it on... |
Reebl User ID: 78211251 United States 01/23/2020 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's have a real trial with witnesses Quoting: NDFarm [link to news.trust.org] A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday About 72% agreed that the trial "should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify," including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should "act as impartial jurors" during the trial. You're aware this is a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy right? Democrats have a real hard time uttering the word Republic, cause it sounds to much like Republican. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60905062 United States 01/23/2020 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's have a real trial with witnesses Quoting: NDFarm [link to news.trust.org] A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday About 72% agreed that the trial "should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify," including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should "act as impartial jurors" during the trial. Good idea, even Trump wants witnesses. Only Moscow Mitch seems dead set against witnesses. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53199845 United States 01/23/2020 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tiny sample, 2200 people. Show me a desired outcome and I'll design you a poll to get it for you. Too many ways to rig a poll to take any of them seriously. How many 2016 polls from "reputable" places showed 80-90% chance of Hillary winning? |
~kpm~
User ID: 75950402 United States 01/23/2020 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Nickadimus Since many of you don't grasp this concept, let me try and help. It was the HOUSE'S job to produce witness testimony in the HOUSE. It's not the senate's job to provide the HOUSE with witnesses, or data of any sort. Think of the Senate as like the jury. The Lawyers take the data to the court and try it all across the floor for the Jury to make their decision. Imagine the defense lawyers asking the Jury to produce witness and documents???? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? It's a joke. Every single senator knows it. Why in the fuwk do you think Dianne Fienstien walked off last night? She ain't stupid... Nick® yes, i agree with everything you wrote here. but, what's this about feinstein walking off/out? didn't hear about this. thanks Madcow and Hayes blasted their liberal heroes for falling asleep and walking out telling them to resign ASAP Kpm. What are your thoughts on this. I have a freaking wild notion flying around my head...What if this is all "purposeful"? Here's what I mean. Is it possible Barr and Durham have so much felonious dirt on the DNC, that a deal was struck. The deal was, you all don't get deaded, but you go on national television and collapse the Democratic Party on live air... This would explain the shit you just "can't make up"...the sheer lunacy? Nick® Lol, I think all of them in the room know the outcome and really don’t care about listening to Pile of Schiff blather on about hearsay, it’s a huge waste of time and money and they already know it’s backfired on them, how embarrassing When Schiff started this process he knew it wasn’t ever going to pass in the senate It’s being done to effect the elections for the general public, from prez on down the line, turn it blue This is one huge election rally for the Dems, it’s the only way they get an audience while Trump brings in thousands for his ~With forethought and malice Whitless enacted an EO giving nursing homes immunity from wrongful death prosecutions, forced them to take in infected patients and is responsible for over 6500+ nursing home deaths~ |
Buzzcheeze
User ID: 77927758 United States 01/23/2020 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1st -Adam Schiff 2nd -Joe Biden 3rd -Hunter Biden 4th -Whistle Blower 1 5th -Whistle Blower 2 6th -Obama 7th -Nancy Pelosi 8th -John Kerry 9th -Mitt Romney 10th - RUDY That should get to the TRUTH and to bottom of it. Last Edited by Buzzcheeze on 01/23/2020 11:04 AM "TRUMP WON" "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by" 'My ego is smaller than yours Why is abbreviation such a long word “When seconds MATTER, cops are only minutes away "Cut out a man's tongue and you dont prove him a liar. It just proves you fear what he has to say" |
GSB/LTD
User ID: 8080014 United States 01/23/2020 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nickadimus
User ID: 77113012 United States 01/23/2020 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: JJ Johns yes, i agree with everything you wrote here. but, what's this about feinstein walking off/out? didn't hear about this. thanks Madcow and Hayes blasted their liberal heroes for falling asleep and walking out telling them to resign ASAP Kpm. What are your thoughts on this. I have a freaking wild notion flying around my head...What if this is all "purposeful"? Here's what I mean. Is it possible Barr and Durham have so much felonious dirt on the DNC, that a deal was struck. The deal was, you all don't get deaded, but you go on national television and collapse the Democratic Party on live air... This would explain the shit you just "can't make up"...the sheer lunacy? Nick® Lol, I think all of them in the room know the outcome and really don’t care about listening to Pile of Schiff blather on about hearsay, it’s a huge waste of time and money and they already know it’s backfired on them, how embarrassing When Schiff started this process he knew it wasn’t ever going to pass in the senate It’s being done to effect the elections for the general public, from prez on down the line, turn it blue This is one huge election rally for the Dems, it’s the only way they get an audience while Trump brings in thousands for his The depravity is deeper than the Laurentean Abyss... Nick® Pure Life-Get it on... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78348454 United States 01/23/2020 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78170378 United States 01/23/2020 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~kpm~
User ID: 75950402 United States 01/23/2020 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump didn't get to call witnessess in the house kangaroo court. I'd say EAT SHIT AND DIE MOTHER FUCKKKKER Quoting: Anonymous Coward 39516942 Then trump should be demanding wittesses now. Let's hear all witnesses. You really are retarded. Since Republicans did ask for witnesses during the house hearings and were denied, technically they should be allowed to have them now Fair is fair ~With forethought and malice Whitless enacted an EO giving nursing homes immunity from wrongful death prosecutions, forced them to take in infected patients and is responsible for over 6500+ nursing home deaths~ |
Nickadimus
User ID: 77113012 United States 01/23/2020 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump didn't get to call witnessess in the house kangaroo court. I'd say EAT SHIT AND DIE MOTHER FUCKKKKER Quoting: Anonymous Coward 39516942 Then trump should be demanding wittesses now. Let's hear all witnesses. You really are retarded. We're talking about POTATO-tarded... Nick® Pure Life-Get it on... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78213671 United States 01/23/2020 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JJ Johns
J to the 3rd User ID: 78129343 Switzerland 01/23/2020 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since many of you don't grasp this concept, let me try and help. It was the HOUSE'S job to produce witness testimony in the HOUSE. It's not the senate's job to provide the HOUSE with witnesses, or data of any sort. Think of the Senate as like the jury. The Lawyers take the data to the court and try it all across the floor for the Jury to make their decision. Imagine the defense lawyers asking the Jury to produce witness and documents???? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? It's a joke. Every single senator knows it. Why in the fuwk do you think Dianne Fienstien walked off last night? She ain't stupid... Nick® yes, i agree with everything you wrote here. but, what's this about feinstein walking off/out? didn't hear about this. thanks Madcow and Hayes blasted their liberal heroes for falling asleep and walking out telling them to resign ASAP thanks kpm . . No clotshot, NEVER! . Mad as hell! . |
JJ Johns
J to the 3rd User ID: 78129343 Switzerland 01/23/2020 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: NDFarm That's why there will be a vote on witnesses and documents later in the trial. I'm just stating what 72% of Americans want. Read what you posted. They want witnesses who have FIRSTHAND knowledge of what they allege took place. People who were on the call, who were directly in the room. Oddly enough there weren't a lot of people called by the Dems that met that criteria. I'm going to put all of this to rest for all of you. In the beginning of this impeachment trial, Chuck Schumer introduced amendments to the Impeachment which were voted DOWN, to ask the Senate to call witnesses and provide documents. Since the Senate knows what the constitution requires them to do, they told the Dems to fuck off. Do your own fucking job, they siad. We the Senate are only the Jury. Now why do you think they all did that? IT'S NOT THEIR FUCKING JOB, DUMBASSES! It's the burden lain upon the accuser to provide evidence, including witnesses, to prosecute a defender. END OF FUCKING STORY. Can they call witnesses; YES. Will they? Apparently not; so are your agreements a fucking requisite? Have they been a requisite the entire trial? Nope... Nick® It's hilarious to watch GLP ret@rds claim to know how impeachment works and speak with authority. The Senate runs a trial, it's nothing to do with the House other than the indictment. A trial has witnesses and evidence presented, period. . . No clotshot, NEVER! . Mad as hell! . |
Poster Nutbag
Nemesis of Harpua User ID: 73773441 United States 01/23/2020 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Polls showed Hillary was above the 95th percentile to win the last election. This is where polls get you. Believe them at your own risk. You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the effects of ignoring eality. See you in November shitstain. ...it's a sign of the nation's decay. "I'm just some guy, asswipe." -Sam the Sleazebag |
vEyeSea
User ID: 78112163 United States 01/23/2020 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I agree, let's get Vindman, Yovanavich and Taylor back. In fact, I think it's time we heard from the whistleblower. Let's call some Ukranians, like the one that Yovanavich gave a 'do not prosecute' list to (that she testified under oath she never did.) And lets get their phone records from that period, including their govt issued blackberries. To learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. When the government is wrong, it's dangerous to be right. The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. -Robspierre |