WW3 Europe front. UPDATE page 532 -February 2024, the decisive month

Monkeypox: Pandemic scenario cannot be ruled out…, expert explains how the virus can become dangerous

Despite the rise in the number of cases, it is still too early to talk about a monkeypox epidemic, an expert pointed out. “Unless the virus has evolved significantly, both in its transmissibility and in its modes of transmission, this virus is known to be not very transmissible." But, the pandemic scenario cannot be ruled out completely, he further warned.

“We're seeing the emergence of an unusual phenomenon, but it's still difficult to know whether it will explode into an epidemic, or whether its spread will be more contained. In recent days, the number of cases has doubled every three or four days, which could signal the exponential growth of an epidemic wave."

It should always be remembered that an epidemic progression of contamination follows an exponential law which can be very rapid. For the moment, what we know about the monkeypox virus does not lead us to fear the massive contamination of the general population. Unless the virus has evolved significantly, both in its transmissibility and in its modes of transmission, this virus is known to be not very transmissible.

H Y P E R M U T A T E D ???

My only opinion on monkey pox or other diseases that suddenly surfaced is that they started to be picked up by the MSM right after Popasna fell to the Russians, triggering the collapse of Ukrainian Army, which will trigger the collapse of the Ukrainian nation and state.


So, all these diseases are stupid attempts at DIVERTING the masses from the utter defeat of the West in Ukraine, and BLINDING the said masses of what is about to come our way : famine, war and economic collapse before year's end.



I have said that the pandemic card (with the kill shot "vaccine attached) had FAILED, and the last card to be played is world war.



Which is about to happen, because Ukraine have already started to fall, and the globalists CANNOT accept such a defeat, because NEXT to fall is the entire front of Eastern Europe, from Baltic States to Bulgaria, and this is GAME OVER for a one world government.


Russia and China are becoming very inter-linked, and close to become the other pol of the multi-polar world currently in the forming, and a process that cannot be stopped, no matter what.

In Stunning Shift, WaPo Admits Catastrophic-Conditions, Collapsing-Morale Of Ukraine Front-Line Forces

[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]


WaPo Article
[link to www.washingtonpost.com (secure)]

Pushing Christian Russia into the arms of China is a really bad move from the west.

At this moment, it seems to be transmitted still mostly by homosexual males.

Why would this be so?

Didn't you yourself say Putin does not intend to destroy Ukraine, he is only trying to denazify it?

Once upon a time in the west everyone knew how to snip... but snipping has gone out of fashion. The new generation is very ignorant really.

They think if you snip, you are messing with their posts or something and will retaliate in kind - or so they believe.

If I understand right, Turkey has the power to make it impossible for Sweden to enter NATO. Why is that? Maybe NATO should change its rules. A one-member ban should be impossible. Or is there something I have misunderstood?

I know it's an outrageous idea, but take it a thought exercise.

What if Russia were itself to join NATO?

Sure, it goes against all logic as we know it - but let's give it some thought.

Wouldn't it be better than Russia joining China in some sort of unholy alliance?

It seems absolutely impossible either for NATO to ever accept Russia, or for Russia to want to join NATO.

But would this be impossible if NATO were to be "upgraded" into a Born Again NATO, with some more realistic visions adapted to the real modern world (not the world as it was after WW II)?

A NATO whose vision, and purposes, would not clash with those of Russia, but rather be able to encompass and integrate both - the western nations AND Russia's?

This would require a lot of work, and a lot of changing mentalities.

Isn't trying to prepare just a waste of time if you are living in densely populated western Europe?

Anything you have stacked will be taken by force - if not by governments, then by roving criminal bands or wannabe rebels.

I don't understand how you came to this conclusion.


Ukraine won't be destroyed, unless the direct conflict between NATO and Russia will linger to much in Ukraine, before spilling over.


But Ukraine, as a country, is in danger of disappearing, because Russia cannot simply stop if Ukraine is going to mount a counter-offensive later on.


This will force Russia advance even more, capture even more, or destroy, if they can't capture, until one side is beaten to a pulp, and I don't see that side being Russia.


Even if Russia stops where they are NOW, Ukraine, as a country, already lost their entire gas and oil fields, 90% of their coal, 80% of their iron, biggest nuclear power plant, and about 30% of their best farm lands (Crimeea and Donbass).


They will be left with a "country" of 30 million people, that have NO RESOURCES, and only about 70% of their farm land.


Such country will rapidly collapse, many parts will join Russia, others Poland, and whatever is left (if anything is left) will be something like Rwanda, before that small nugget will also be absorbed by Russia or Poland.



The only way that Ukraine can be saved, and continue to exist, is to capitulate, and accept all Russian conditions, because in this case, Russia will make sure Ukraine survives as a country, but neutral and demilitarized.


But this is just a fantasy scenario, because it is not going to happen.


The globalists will make SURE that it won't happen, and instead, WW3 happens.

You missunderstood how a military alliance works. ANY MILITARY alliance.


A military alliance cannot function with majority. It must have unanimity in decisions, otherwise is not a military alliance.


It can't change the voting rules. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.


What it can do is exclude members.

I saddens me to see that people don't know what I consider basic knowledge.


Russia intended to join NATO, but they were refused.


And I will tell you WHY.


The United States CANNOT ACCEPT in NATO any member that is their equal. The United States wants a bunch of weak countries that will be their SUBJECTS...not ALLIES.


The United States is the reason why the world is not united : they want to be the hegemon, and EVERYONE ELSE to be much weaker then them.


Is as simple as that.

From what you are saying yourself, NATO is not a military alliance. Turkey by itself is able to veto Sweden entering NATO - so how is there "unanimity of decision"?

I hope it does not sadden you to see when people are trying to inform themselves.

I didn't know Russia actually intended to join NATO, as the idea seems to strange and counter-intuitive. Wasn't NATO created to protect the western nations against the expansion of communism? Admittedly that was the then USSR.

Who exactly vetoed Russia's entry into NATO?

Not everyone can be an expert in military matters from the start, DR...

A big apartment building with empty windows, intense fire coming out of 3 adjacent windwos, purportedly having been struck by a missile but no big hole in the wall.

Do I have to do also grammar lessons?


If Turkey's vetoes, there is no unanimity in the DECISION TO ADMIT A NEW MEMBER.


I am saying that NATO is a military alliance, and by DEFAULT, works with unanimity of decision.



You said that they could change the voting rules...THEY CAN'T. And this is why any member can veto. But a DECISION will be taken by UNANIMITY.


Seriously, are you stupid?

Last Edited by Recollector on 05/28/2022 07:33 AM

Russia approached the U.S. for entering NATO. It wasn't an official process, just Russian proposal to the U.S. to join NATO.


The U.S. said nope. They gave some stupid reasons, but everyone knows that the U.S. cannot accept an equal in NATO, especially Russia.


Globalist elite are ruling the U.S., and the U.S. does what the globalist tell them to do.


The globalists want to exist a SINGLE superpower, before they are ready for one world government. And this superpower is the U.S., and the only way to have it, is for ANYONE ELSE to be much weaker then the U.S., or controlled by the globalist cabal through other means.


Russia and China cannot be controlled by other means to the point of becoming puppet states. Like the U.K., or Germany, or Australia or Japan.


So, the moment a country like Russia would join NATO, all of a sudden the globalists run out of the perfect enemy while in the same time Russia becomes the U.S. equal in an alliance that will likely split the moment Russia doesn't accept the globalist agenda.



It is better to have Russia as the enemy, instead an ally that can, at any point, dismantle NATO, by rejecting the globalist agenda, which for Russia is to become, in the case of a potential NATO membership, a puppet state.

Thank you for your civility.

Maybe it's you who don't understand what I am saying, OP.

So in fact, it was not the US that said no, it was the globalists behind the US.

When did this happen? Who was the US spokesman or intermediate?

Russia have almost taken Donbas. Won’t take long as the Ukraine forces are falling apart.

So what happens then. Does Russia stop. Or does it move towards Odessa and Moldova?

At what point NATO do something ?

The U.S. is the spearhead of globalist elites since 1947. Every single president was and is under their payroll since.


Exception : Trump.


And because he didn't was with them, he got removed. And won't come back, ever.

dr do you think trump is alive or has been killed?

Now this are very pertinent questions, and very hard to answer.


As anything that I have predicted with Covid, events can accelerate or delay the inevitable total collapse, in order to implement the NWO and one world government.


My mistake was to give hard dates, and even if I conditioned those date on certain events, most people only remembered THE DATES, telling me how I failed in my predictions.


But have I?


Shortly, before answering your question, I would just say that my prediction that world will NEVER GO BACK TO NORMAL is pretty damn accurate. My prediction that we're going to collapse, one way or the other (bio-weapons, martial law OR war) is on track.



And those prediction were made in the spring of 2020, when pretty much everyone alive would never believe that I could be right.


Now, it's 2022, and I bet that the close to 100% percentage of people that in April 2020 thought I as insane, predicting that world will never return to normal and will collapse, is far smaller today.



What is going to happen after Donbass fails?


As I previously said recently, the course of events will depend entirely on globalists decision about Ukraine : let it fall and get Poland involved, and by extent NATO, and fight Russia inside former Ukraine (at first) and in Eastern Europe afterwards, or NOT let Ukraine fell, and fight Russia as much as possible inside Ukraine, before Eastern Europe gets the brunt.


Russia's response will be a reactive one to such scenarios.


The only possible way that Russia will initiate, is if Ukraine, which is rebuilding their army in Poland, Romania and Germany, being armed with enough NATO hardware, will get to the point of threatening the newly conquered territories.


If such scenario happens, Russia will call for mobilization of reservists, which won't take very long, and strike the Ukrainian training bases and personnel in Poland, Germany and Romania.


But I believe that such a scenario, while possible, doesn't have much chances of happening. Russia will rather present the situation to their people, call for reservists mobilization, deploy, but will NOT strike the training bases, rather using this threat for widening the conflict in Ukraine past Donbass, towards 4 main axis : Dnieprpetrovsk - Zaporoje (Dniepr river part that is most easily to defend, due to widening of the river between the 2 cities), Krivoy Rog industrial conurbation (back door to Dniepr river, in case first axis attack fails), Mykolaiv ->Odessa -> Transnistria, and Kharkiv metro area.


Once they achieved that, and NATO will still not initiate a direct or indirect attack (using Polish-Lithuanian "peace" keepers), Russia will STOP.


If NATO gets involved, it's WW3, so...yeah. It's WW3.




My personal belief is that Russia will do everything possible to avoid being the FIRST who strikes NATO, unless the Ukrainian army that is rebuilding outside Ukraine is strong enough, and able to start a counteroffensive BEFORE Russia is able to consolidate their current front lines.


No matter how much trust level Putin have (and it is A LOT, over 90%), he, his staff and his generals cannot risk the opening salvo, without having a SERIOUS REASON, otherwise those trust levels will quickly drop, and even risk popular uprising.


So, Russia will take it to the chin, before they answer.



Thing is, it doesn't really matter what Russia does after Donbass, WW3 is 100% inevitable, be it June, July or August, at the latest.


I believe that unless Russia preempts in Poland, Germany and Romania, the forces currently training and arming in the above 3 countries will be ready for a counter offensive in August.

Last Edited by Recollector on 05/28/2022 11:03 AM