Ozone Sterilization for N95 Mask Re-use What say you? | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 01/31/2020 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72790504 United States 01/31/2020 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 01/31/2020 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Explain why.... It appears scientific and sound but, I'd like to hear actual evidence as to why it wouldn't work. I don't PLAN on re-using any masks. I have enough for me and the family but *IF* this gets protracted and there are no supplies, I think this is better than nothing. One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72497887 United States 01/31/2020 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | O3 breaks down into Harmless 02 within an hour or two if memory serves me correctly. I am the guy that posted about owning two large Ozone Generators in a couple threads over the last couple days. O3(ozone) is very unstable and it breaks down very quickly into Harmless O2(Oxygen). Your Safe Brother. MAGA |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 78421452 United States 02/01/2020 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | O3 breaks down into Harmless 02 within an hour or two if memory serves me correctly. I am the guy that posted about owning two large Ozone Generators in a couple threads over the last couple days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72497887 O3(ozone) is very unstable and it breaks down very quickly into Harmless O2(Oxygen). Your Safe Brother. MAGA Yes, thanks... One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76563526 France 02/08/2020 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the problem is the breaking down of materials. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76563526 probably a couple of time are safe but then you are tearing the materials apart. silicon is o3 resistent btw you can sanitize by steam. I hear ya! The material breakdown has been my concern... Hopefully, the supply of masks doesn't dwindle. One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78323780 United States 02/09/2020 01:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75953087 United States 02/09/2020 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Indeed... As does Bleach. As does TIME. As does UV-C. Do you mean, The OVEN Where you cook your food? Last Edited by Travis Bickle on 02/09/2020 01:37 AM One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Nine's
User ID: 41083541 United States 02/09/2020 02:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I say it's a good question, but I'd go with the "don't do it" poster. Hopefully things won't get so bad it's A choice that has to be made. It's good to think ahead though, isn't it? Here's an article from CDC that you might be interested in regarding extended use and re use. A few highlights follow, but you can and probably should read the entire thing at: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] "Consider use of a cleanable face shield (preferred3) or a surgical mask over an N95 respirator and/or other steps (e.g., masking patients, use of engineering controls) to reduce surface contamination. Perform hand hygiene with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer before and after touching or adjusting the respirator (if necessary for comfort or to maintain fit)." "The most significant risk is of contact transmission from touching the surface of the contaminated respirator. One study found that nurses averaged 25 touches per shift to their face, eyes, or N95 respirator during extended use.(15)Contact transmission occurs through direct contact with others as well as through indirect contact by touching and contaminating surfaces that are then touched by other people. Respiratory pathogens on the respirator surface can potentially be transferred by touch to the wearer’s hands and thus risk causing infection through subsequent touching of the mucous membranes of the face (i.e., self-inoculation). While studies have shown that some respiratory pathogens (22-24) remain infectious on respirator surfaces for extended periods of time, in microbial transfer (25-27) and reaerosolization studies (28-32) more than ~99.8% have remained trapped on the respirator after handling or following simulated cough or sneeze." |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 02:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I say it's a good question, but I'd go with the "don't do it" poster. Hopefully things won't get so bad it's A choice that has to be made. It's good to think ahead though, isn't it? Quoting: Nine's Here's an article from CDC that you might be interested in regarding extended use and re use. A few highlights follow, but you can and probably should read the entire thing at: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] "Consider use of a cleanable face shield (preferred3) or a surgical mask over an N95 respirator and/or other steps (e.g., masking patients, use of engineering controls) to reduce surface contamination. Perform hand hygiene with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer before and after touching or adjusting the respirator (if necessary for comfort or to maintain fit)." "The most significant risk is of contact transmission from touching the surface of the contaminated respirator. One study found that nurses averaged 25 touches per shift to their face, eyes, or N95 respirator during extended use.(15)Contact transmission occurs through direct contact with others as well as through indirect contact by touching and contaminating surfaces that are then touched by other people. Respiratory pathogens on the respirator surface can potentially be transferred by touch to the wearer’s hands and thus risk causing infection through subsequent touching of the mucous membranes of the face (i.e., self-inoculation). While studies have shown that some respiratory pathogens (22-24) remain infectious on respirator surfaces for extended periods of time, in microbial transfer (25-27) and reaerosolization studies (28-32) more than ~99.8% have remained trapped on the respirator after handling or following simulated cough or sneeze." Thanks Nine's! But. this article presupposes the re-use in the same environment and adds that studies have shown even TRAINED users touch their face at least 25 times a shift. The BIGGEST Presupposition is that you'd have another mask to change into. *WHAT-IF* There was no other mask to change to and, you sterilized the mask between the re-use of it? Better odds than NONE, if you ask me. Last Edited by Travis Bickle on 02/09/2020 02:23 AM One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Nine's
User ID: 41083541 United States 02/09/2020 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're very welcome. It reminds a person of that "rock and a hard place" expression. Might want to start eyeing coffee filters and rubber bands for some creative adaptations if bad goes to worse. 8) We can't pin it for coverage right now since there are so many green pins, but I'm sure it'll come back around. Maybe others will also click the "recommend pin" button in your first post. Until then, we can watch for a post that's sure to hit here sooner or later, about "A video of a purported doctor advising people to steam disposable surgical face masks in order to reuse them has been viewed hundreds of thousands of times in multiple Chinese-language posts on Facebook, Weibo and Youku in January 2020." [link to factcheck.afp.com (secure)] |
simplify
User ID: 75394427 Canada 02/09/2020 02:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78377646 United States 02/09/2020 03:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13970230 Australia 02/09/2020 03:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76565960 United States 02/09/2020 06:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read that some of the by products of Ozone (O3) generator machines were Nitrogen, and it caused rust in disposal facilities / garbage shoots. So apparently it produces more than just pure Ozone, as the name would suggest, erroneously. So as long as there is not a ferro reactive component nearby you should be GTG, or as long as the mask you are to utilise has no such component to it. It would also probably be a good idea and practise to keep firearms out of the same room, perhaps the ammo also. YMMV |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78420836 United States 02/09/2020 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78442783 02/09/2020 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75483945 Canada 02/09/2020 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another great reference. [link to sportsozone.com (secure)] Even has some various times and life expectancies of various viruses and bacteria. It seems to unravel the pathogens in a matter of minutes. One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72738806 United States 02/09/2020 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78442783 02/09/2020 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another great reference. Quoting: Travis Bickle [link to sportsozone.com (secure)] Even has some various times and life expectancies of various viruses and bacteria. It seems to unravel the pathogens in a matter of minutes. Bro give people warnings when a link is a forced pdf download.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77901425 United States 02/09/2020 04:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77362793 Canada 02/09/2020 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cycle through use each mask once but don’t throw out. If you run out and can’t get any more then look at doing this but only as a last resort. Don’t forget your giggles and disposable gloves. Get a good routine of hand washing and removal and replacement of PPE. |
Travis Bickle
(OP) Vigilantes need love too.... User ID: 72715998 United States 02/09/2020 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [TLDR= you need to have a 70% Ethyl Alcohol for the best disinfection] So, I was reading a bit last night and learned something new. Apparently, the standard Isopropyl Alcohol that is available pretty much anywhere is a 91% solution. (I actually checked my bottles that I already have and, they're ALL 91%.) However, that percentage is NOT the best for quickly destroying viruses and bacteria. Here's a link: [link to blog.gotopac.com (secure)] From the link: The presence of water is a crucial factor in destroying or inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microorganisms with isopropyl alcohol. Water acts as a catalyst and plays a key role in denaturing the proteins of vegetative cell membranes. 70% IPA solutions penetrate the cell wall more completely which permeates the entire cell, coagulates all proteins, and therefore the microorganism dies. Extra water content slows evaporation, therefore increasing surface contact time and enhancing effectiveness. Isopropyl alcohol concentrations over 91% coagulate proteins instantly. Consequently, a protective layer is created which protects other proteins from further coagulation. More info here: [link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)] One of these days... A *REAL* rain is gonna come and wash all this scum off the streets. |
Billxam, ABATE, AWHA
User ID: 56270897 United States 02/09/2020 04:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Better off with a ultraviolet steripen and/of bleach spray. Alcohol only works by removing the virus from surfaces during evaporation, it does NOT kill the virus, only bacterium. Last Edited by Billxam, MAGA+, ABATE, AWHA on 02/09/2020 04:09 PM Proud to be UnV'd There is one constant in life: If you build something worth having, someone will try to take it or destroy it. Proud member of A Brotherhood Against Totalitarian Enactments, Americans Who Hate Aging, proud supporter of attractive women. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78256331 United States 02/09/2020 04:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't need an ozone generator. A $15 Vacum UV light bulb (sub 254nm UV-C, for example 180ish nm) generates ozone. Just put that bulb in a cheap socket in a large OPAQUE (and closed)(UV-C is harmful, don't expose yourself to it at all) steralite container and plug it in outside for 30minutes with the object in the container. When done, unplug the socket from the mains then open the container and retrieve the object. The object is sterilized by both the uv-c light and the ozone it produced. Whole thing should cost you less than 30-40 bucks. |