|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
can you build a drone to fly near a chemtrail plane to film it spraying?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
Why is it so difficult to find a chemtard who is willing to discuss the facts about the trails in the sky?
Do facts even matter to chemtards?
How do they vet their sources of information? Because it sure looks like chemtard believe what they want to believe without any desire to learn the other side of the coin, science.
Why do chemtards accept the assumptions of other chemtards as truth? Morons agreeing with each other about anything is NOT a good record!
Someone said science is rejected because of "funding" and blah blah blah...
I have no fucking doubt that people have paid to have bullshit published. But, no one has shown that the science that explains the trails in the sky, more than adequately, is anything but truth/fact.
Chemtards make assumptions and convince themselves that it's normal to believe their own assumptions over the expertise of real scientists.
IT'S FUCKING CRAZY!
I have recently posted some links to atmospheric science sites and not one chemtard was interested in learning about the subject. why?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10599025 If they had any interest in the truth their first step would be to objectively attempt to confirm the trails to be what they are purported by those in know to be, which is contrails. First step in any process such as this is to eliminate the obvious first, in this case that would be contrails. You can’t simply claim the absurd without first disproving the obvious. Have you ever encountered a chemtard who actually gave sound arguments for why the trails they are referring to could not just be contrails? Have you ever encountered a chemtard who was able to give a scientific reason why contrails shouldn’t persist?
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
