|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Coronavirus Intel Clearinghouse
|
|
Poster Handle
|
SkyTraveler |
|
Post Content
|
...
I seen this and I was doing some equations for myself, and it is well below a 0.1% chance that someone would have contracted this from Singapore, making r0 static at 2.5, the population, average air traffic, and the biggest red flag, current confirmed count. Even lower then a 0.01% chance for the entire said scenario to have happened at current levels. It indicates a lie, or a much broader, unseen infected count.
It is a very bad sign that Singapore is producing global infections already. It is telling of a much faster transmission contrary to all of our data, fabricated OR real.
-001
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78305299 Hi 001, Given your assessment of the math are others that you work with in agreement? How does this impact our timeline in USA? Thank you Is there any possibility of transparency among anyone to address this virus? Think about it...Right now the virus has the upper hand in this war. The virus is showing more intelligence and effective coordination. It’s gaining in strength as it goes. Leaders need to put their egos and fears in their pockets and support transparency. Otherwise...we are on the titanic listening to the band as we sink into the abyss. If you read all of 001's original posts, he mentions many times that transparency is not the goal. In fact, it is the opposite goal. The goal is to keep the public as calm and orderly as possible so as to buy time to find a treatment. I don't know if this will prove to be the right decision, but it certainly is a logical one with sound rationale. Hi, you misread my point... leaders need to allow transparency so the experts can gather essential data to combat this. If information is hidden it places regular people at risk who are oblivious to the risks. I understand the goal of not spooking the herd. And buying time. Thank you
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
