Justice: Roger Stone and Obama

You vented anger, that is what I expect from most. I asked a question and presented a situation, you did not respond to what I asked. Perhaps you should actually read what I said and try responding.

So the prosecutors who worked for Robert Mueller had a temper tantrum because the Department of Justice thought 9 years in jail is too stiff a penalty for Stone's "crime". While I think Stone is nothing more than a self promoter, lets be honest, he didn't hurt anyone and he wasn't accused of doing so. While people who hate Trump want to see him die in jail, I question their idea of fair and just. That is why I present the following question.

IF Durham proves that Comey, Brennan, Clapper and Obama conspired to spy on the Trump campaign (a flagrant crime) for political reasons, would you support them going to jail for 10 years? We know Hillary Clinton illegally removed classified information from the government and put it on her personal server, the penalty for which is at least a decade in jail. Would you support her being jailed for that long?

I am not asking this question of partisans, I am asking it of it of independents. Would this country really benefit from seeing Hillary jailed for ten years? Will the country really be safer if Stone is in jail for ten years? Be careful what you asked for, you may have to live with it.

Here is truth. If Obama were convicted of spying on Trump's campaign, Trump would pardon him, same for Hillary. Some of us remember when Nixon was pardoned. It was the right thing to do. Sometimes to heal a nation, you have to move on.

What has happened to stone is blatant over prosecution of process crimes. He was put in a perjury trap.

What Obama, Clinton, Comey, Lerner, holder, etc have been doing for decades is breaking down our system of government. They and the deep state through all possible manners of criminal behavior and treason have attacked the very safeguards the framers put in the Constitution.

This is fact. They weaponized govt agencies against political enemies, most recently having weaponized the house of Representatives against the sitting president.

Pardoning them would not "heal the country". It would signal half the population that it's pitchfork and torch time. It would be actual proof that the rule of law is dead, proof that checks and balances are gone, and proof that the Constitution is gone.

I accept and tolerate the fact that any govt system is going to have corruption. I would say most people can tolerate "garden variety" corruption. What these people have done goes so far beyond, and has such dire consequences that there just be punishment levied and carried out.

That would only be step one though. I believe we need a constitutional convention of the states to add an amendment that enforces term limits on congress. Just like FDR gained too much power in his 4 terms, these career politicians have gained and consolidated too much power. They have made laws that circumvent or flat out defy the checks and balances. They have turned the FBI, CIA, NSA into the proletariate.

Again another non responsive answer. A critique to be sure; but, not a response. While you mentally masturbate over yourself, you do not deal with the issue presented. I shall simplify it for you. Assume Stone and Obama are both guilty, would you still wish them to go to jail till they die for being political whores? Does that help you?

What I say is not merely about revenge, although I like revenge too and I freely admit it.

What is IS most about is RETURN OF JUSTICE AND RULE OF LAW. We cannot allow people who have worked to undermine and destroy the rule of law, some of them for decades now, for their own gain, go get away with this. SOMEONE MUST PAY FOR WHAT HAS BEEN DONE. That restores the balance.

The rule of law must be re-established. For this to happen, the Clintons - at least Hillary - and Obama and his minions - MUST BE PROSECUTED, TRIED AND PUNISHED. We can't let them get away with a legion of crimes against individuals and the USA and other countries.

Again, not what I asked. Is anyone capable of having an actual conversation about my original question?

OP all of these people you keep accusing of ignoring your question DID answer the question/issue posited in the your first post.

You just didn't like their answers.

Typical liberal response - keep accusing others of being ignorant until you get the answer you want.