Men appear to be more vulnerable to the coronavirus: report

ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT!

Forget what "they" tell you to believe.

Use your own eyes and your own brain to ascertain the information being presented, not with words, but by actions.

I've seen dozens of videos and numerous pictures coming out of China that clearly show not only men, but women, children and even animals are all being KILLED, BEATEN, FORCIBLY TAKEN and LOCKED into their homes.

If this is so well known and factual, then why slaughter animals? Why beat and drag women out of or into their homes?

Anyone saying this only effects certain races, ages, genders, etc... are in complete DENIAL of what we are seeing actually happen.

I thought the cytokine storm was the main cause of death? A weaker immune system would lessen the threat of a overwhelming cytokine storm wouldn't it? Am I misunderstanding something here?

I thought the cytokine storm was the main cause of death? A weaker immune system would lessen the threat of a overwhelming cytokine storm wouldn't it? Am I misunderstanding something here?

There have been many posts about this here on GLP.

-------------------------------------------------------------​-----------------------------------------------------------

Scientists believe that males could be more vulnerable to the coronavirus because they may have a weaker immune response to the disease, according to a column by Financial Times.

The virus has killed roughly 1,300 people and infected over 48,000 worldwide as of Thursday. Another case was discovered in San Diego Calif. on Wednesday, bringing the total U.S. infected to 14.

Roughly two-thirds of 99 infected patients admitted to a Wuhan hospital last month were men, science writer Anjana Ahuja wrote, citing a Lancet medical study published on Jan. 30.

"It is an eye-catching discrepancy," Ahuja wrote. "A picture is emerging of 2019-nCoV [now COVID-19] as a novel pathogen that disproportionately affects older men, particularly those with existing illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes."

[link to www.foxnews.com (secure)]

There have been many posts about this here on GLP.

-------------------------------------------------------------​-----------------------------------------------------------

Scientists believe that males could be more vulnerable to the coronavirus because they may have a weaker immune response to the disease, according to a column by Financial Times.

The virus has killed roughly 1,300 people and infected over 48,000 worldwide as of Thursday. Another case was discovered in San Diego Calif. on Wednesday, bringing the total U.S. infected to 14.

Roughly two-thirds of 99 infected patients admitted to a Wuhan hospital last month were men, science writer Anjana Ahuja wrote, citing a Lancet medical study published on Jan. 30.

"It is an eye-catching discrepancy," Ahuja wrote. "A picture is emerging of 2019-nCoV [now COVID-19] as a novel pathogen that disproportionately affects older men, particularly those with existing illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes."

[link to www.foxnews.com (secure)]

Please, dont be dumb.

China's male population is much higher than the female. (Due to one-child policies, and aborting of female fetuses).

Chinas population is 70% male.

So of course its going to skew data.

i think the difference is only 0.5%

i think the difference is only 0.5%

i think the difference is only 0.5%

There have been many posts about this here on GLP.

-------------------------------------------------------------​-----------------------------------------------------------

Scientists believe that males could be more vulnerable to the coronavirus because they may have a weaker immune response to the disease, according to a column by Financial Times.

The virus has killed roughly 1,300 people and infected over 48,000 worldwide as of Thursday. Another case was discovered in San Diego Calif. on Wednesday, bringing the total U.S. infected to 14.

Roughly two-thirds of 99 infected patients admitted to a Wuhan hospital last month were men, science writer Anjana Ahuja wrote, citing a Lancet medical study published on Jan. 30.

"It is an eye-catching discrepancy," Ahuja wrote. "A picture is emerging of 2019-nCoV [now COVID-19] as a novel pathogen that disproportionately affects older men, particularly those with existing illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes."

[link to www.foxnews.com (secure)]

Wow this virus is fucking sexist

Chinese men are heavy smokers, and pre-existing lung conditions could account for the increase in fatality in males.

Here is an interesting thought. If the Leftists had a virus to kill mostly Heterosexual Christian White men, would they release it?

It is all about ACE2 receptors in the lungs where the virus attaches. Men have more. Smokers more. Asians more. Look it up.

There have been many posts about this here on GLP.

-------------------------------------------------------------​-----------------------------------------------------------

Scientists believe that males could be more vulnerable to the coronavirus because they may have a weaker immune response to the disease, according to a column by Financial Times.

The virus has killed roughly 1,300 people and infected over 48,000 worldwide as of Thursday. Another case was discovered in San Diego Calif. on Wednesday, bringing the total U.S. infected to 14.

Roughly two-thirds of 99 infected patients admitted to a Wuhan hospital last month were men, science writer Anjana Ahuja wrote, citing a Lancet medical study published on Jan. 30.

"It is an eye-catching discrepancy," Ahuja wrote. "A picture is emerging of 2019-nCoV [now COVID-19] as a novel pathogen that disproportionately affects older men, particularly those with existing illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes."

[link to www.foxnews.com (secure)]

wait I thought nicotine was supposed to help kill the virus.