Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,300 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 186,633
Pageviews Today: 309,783Threads Today: 113Posts Today: 2,078
03:13 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

A free book to guide you into the 4th density ascension.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77927247
United States
02/18/2020 12:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
A free book to guide you into the 4th density ascension.
Free Kindle Link: [link to www.amazon.com (secure)]

Title: Incessance
Page Count: 407
Genre: Metaphysics / Logic
Synopsis:

This book presents readers with a special challenge, as it constitutes a nonstandard method of self-narration. We contend that the first-person perspective is critically limited to self-conscious narration. Let me explain. When you read from the "first-person perspective", the character is somehow already aware that it is a storytelling agent and has an audience watching, listening for it's story to...unravel. Whether overtly or tacitly, the first-person character always addresses an audience in it’s narration. In the physical world, however, this dualistic situation is logically impossible, and for extremely elementary reasons. If someone is physically alone (i.e. a character sequestered in a room, taking a mushroom trip), their thoughts and feelings cannot be directly transmitted to an ambient audience, unless that audience occupies the same physical space. Otherwise, one is inserting a metaphysical hyperspace in which to ambiently repose physical spaces (including audiences) as codomains and characters as operators. Whether or not the modern world acknowledges this anciently known truth and mathematical fact, Metaphysics is the most comprehensive and fundamental of all theoretical methods of cognition. And when Metaphysics is ignored in first-person narration, the multi-layered logical relationship between audience and character cannot establish, resulting in a bizarre situation where an audience closely looms over a character, without being able to perforate that character’s truly intimate mental activities...because these very activities are intrinsically nonlinear and pre-verbal. The character must linearize it’s expressions for the audience to quickly process them and move smoothly through the story. The narrating character emits only the expressions that are naturally understandable to an audience! Accordingly, any dynamical nonlinear mental expressions unique to a human character are either linearized (simplified) for an audience to naturally understand them, or they are entirely excluded from the narration for want of a nonlinear narrative method to controllably communicate them. The first-person perspective either denatures or entirely bypasses the nonlinear cognitive dynamics of a human character, which is unacceptable for a species with such intricate nonlinear functionality.

Instead, the first-person character expresses direct perceptions, or linearized expressions of cognition. Hardly ever are the nonlinear cognitive dynamics directly expressed. They are deemed chaotic, irreplicable, incoherent, or “too rapid” to capture in static linguistic sentences. What we need, then, is an extended method of expressing dynamical mental feedback. The first-person perspective is pervasively perceptual for the purpose of easing audience communication and story development, and hence, this method prioritizes stability, linearity, and locality. Chaos, interference, and adaptation are regarded as transient disruptions of the delicate first-person flow. When perceptually narrating, the character emits linear, stepwise sentences (i.e. "I am feeling...", "It's time for me to...", "It looks like...", "I do", "I...", and on and on). What this book, Incessance, introduces is a metaphysical generalization of the first-person perspective which attempts to genuinely and specifically communicate the nonlinear levels of human cognition. As mentioned, we call this extended (ad)vantage point...the field-person perspective.





GLP