| Users Online Now: 2,325 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 842,416 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,396,137 | Threads Today: 572 | Posts Today: 9,842 |
| 02:13 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,325 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 842,416 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,396,137 | Threads Today: 572 | Posts Today: 9,842 |
| 02:13 PM | ||
IT'S JUST ALIENS! (coming in the next weeks). | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78832827  United States04/23/2020 05:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bore off with this shit,not that I don't believe in Aliens but because they've been coming since the beginning of March according to this post...along with the same dicks who are saying all the celebs Hanks,Ellen,Oprah etc are all "being arrested as we speak" for kidnapping and killing babies .....utter nonesense Quoting: Shakerbhoy Y'all need to remove your tinfoil hats and flush your fucking heads down the toilet You're mixing total different topics. BTW, do you make the difference between guesses and certainties? Seventh Head spoke about guesses for the precise date but said CERTAINTY for April 2020 for the aliens to come where he is/was. At least, he said that confirmations will be given by the MSM by April 26, unlike many other nutters, as long as a GLPer watches the proper French TV or listens to the right radio at the right time. As we speak, none is sure April 21 passed without event because none has the evidence of it, or the contrary. Who on GLP lives at Orleans in France and monitored the whole sky for more than 48 hours on last April 20/21? None. The rest is ramblings. |
King Triad
 User ID: 77970497 United States04/23/2020 05:48 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78833668 United States04/23/2020 10:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/23/2020 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| J0RDAN
User ID: 75686950 United States04/23/2020 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: J0RDAN Not this time. He has signed an affidavit that permanently installs the whole story into the GLP hall of fails. Has not his affidavit been signed with conditions? ... Quoting: SEVENTH HEAD Signed. PS 1: It's Orléans, France, NOT NEW Orleans, USA!  PS 2: It's the 18th the moment I sign this. Hence 96 hours! PS 3: You will certainly have confirmation of this event in France few days AFTER the event in the MSM! Therefore wait for this news a little bit before closing the case. Give it 4 to 5 days after April 21.  Maybe his story is not finished yet? It could be 'fail' or 'a-file'. We should wait to know what hall we must put his story into. Shame or fame? Those conditions were not part of the original affidavit and are not admissable in the Appellate Court of Fail. Technically speaking, if he hadn't made changes in your post with additional details in his reply to explicit the conditions of his signature, the latter wouldn't be valid. That means that all his further details are to be counted in his contract. So, legally speaking you're wrong. The contractual extension for you to know whether his is wrong or right belongs to his contract such as the 4 to 5 days to close the case. Remember that 'your exhaustively detailed definitions of it' is HIS, not YOURS. You are then forced to wait until April 21 + 5 = April 26 to close his case. The Court of Appeal. Not true. I did not, nor did anyone else notarize that portion. Those were footnotes after the signature, not contractual elements prior. Nothing after a signature on a contract matters. He said “Signed” in red. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77954720 United States04/23/2020 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not true. I did not, nor did anyone else notarize that portion. Those were footnotes after the signature, not contractual elements prior. Nothing after a signature on a contract matters. He said “Signed” in red. Quoting: J0RDAN You did not do anything, accepting the footnotes or rejecting them. Since you didn't reject them after three pages of posts, and that you even later made reference to his reply, you implicitly accepted them. You know that the word 'signed' is not the signature itself. It has no legal value. Besides, you're wrong, footnotes count too in a contract: [link to guides.library.ubc.ca (secure)] The two most common forms of references in legal writing are in-text references and footnotes. The main difference between them is that in-text references are usually included in the text itself while footnotes are given at the bottom of the page. Generally, in-text references are used for memoranda and facta while footnotes are used for other legal writing. Footnotes should be placed on the same page as their accompanying text. This was the case here, footnotes on the same page. |
| J0RDAN
User ID: 75686950 United States04/23/2020 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not true. I did not, nor did anyone else notarize that portion. Those were footnotes after the signature, not contractual elements prior. Nothing after a signature on a contract matters. He said “Signed” in red. Quoting: J0RDAN You did not do anything, accepting the footnotes or rejecting them. Since you didn't reject them after three pages of posts, and that you even later made reference to his reply, you implicitly accepted them. You know that the word 'signed' is not the signature itself. It has no legal value. Besides, you're wrong, footnotes count too in a contract: [link to guides.library.ubc.ca (secure)] The two most common forms of references in legal writing are in-text references and footnotes. The main difference between them is that in-text references are usually included in the text itself while footnotes are given at the bottom of the page. Generally, in-text references are used for memoranda and facta while footnotes are used for other legal writing. Footnotes should be placed on the same page as their accompanying text. This was the case here, footnotes on the same page. I drafted the contract. He signed as is. Then he subsequently appended PSes, which are not official contract language.. Talking about it later does not give consensual agreement to the appendix as part of it. Footnotes added after a signing are not intrinsic to the contract without consensual attestation. Just because they were in the same digital message means nothing. He could have added it 3 pages later. I actually said in a follow-up message that I wasn’t waiting for the MSM, that I would wait until end of day, 21st anyway. The entire story is game over, and his presence on the site should be as well. |
| J0RDAN
User ID: 75686950 United States04/23/2020 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not true. I did not, nor did anyone else notarize that portion. Those were footnotes after the signature, not contractual elements prior. Nothing after a signature on a contract matters. He said “Signed” in red. Quoting: J0RDAN You did not do anything, accepting the footnotes or rejecting them. Since you didn't reject them after three pages of posts, and that you even later made reference to his reply, you implicitly accepted them. You know that the word 'signed' is not the signature itself. It has no legal value. Besides, you're wrong, footnotes count too in a contract: [link to guides.library.ubc.ca (secure)] The two most common forms of references in legal writing are in-text references and footnotes. The main difference between them is that in-text references are usually included in the text itself while footnotes are given at the bottom of the page. Generally, in-text references are used for memoranda and facta while footnotes are used for other legal writing. Footnotes should be placed on the same page as their accompanying text. This was the case here, footnotes on the same page. I drafted the contract. He signed as is. Then he subsequently appended PSes, which are not official contract language. “Talking” about it later does not give consensual agreement to the appendix as part of it. Footnotes added after a signing are not intrinsic to the contract without consensual attestation. Just because they were in the same digital message means nothing. He could have added it 3 pages later. I actually said in a follow-up message that I wasn’t waiting for the MSM, that I would wait until end of day, the 21st anyway. The entire story is game over, and his presence on the site should be as well. This is not an official legal contract. It’s an honors-system contract. |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/23/2020 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78773500 United States04/23/2020 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not true. I did not, nor did anyone else notarize that portion. Those were footnotes after the signature, not contractual elements prior. Nothing after a signature on a contract matters. He said “Signed” in red. Quoting: J0RDAN You did not do anything, accepting the footnotes or rejecting them. Since you didn't reject them after three pages of posts, and that you even later made reference to his reply, you implicitly accepted them. You know that the word 'signed' is not the signature itself. It has no legal value. Besides, you're wrong, footnotes count too in a contract: [link to guides.library.ubc.ca (secure)] The two most common forms of references in legal writing are in-text references and footnotes. The main difference between them is that in-text references are usually included in the text itself while footnotes are given at the bottom of the page. Generally, in-text references are used for memoranda and facta while footnotes are used for other legal writing. Footnotes should be placed on the same page as their accompanying text. This was the case here, footnotes on the same page. I drafted the contract. He signed as is. Then he subsequently appended PSes, which are not official contract language. “Talking” about it later does not give consensual agreement to the appendix as part of it. Footnotes added after a signing are not intrinsic to the contract without consensual attestation. Just because they were in the same digital message means nothing. He could have added it 3 pages later. I actually said in a follow-up message that I wasn’t waiting for the MSM, that I would wait until end of day, the 21st anyway. The entire story is game over, and his presence on the site should be as well. This is not an official legal contract. It’s an honors-system contract. No, he didn't sign the draft as you presented it. He was forced to change 'New Orleans' into 'Orleans, France', among other things. You admitted your mistake based on his PSes where 'Orleans France' was indicated. This means that you acknowledged his PSes as part of the contract. What you waited for is not in the contract. If you reject parts of the contract and accept another parts of that same contract without him signing the new version this means that the contract is null and void. It's not an honors-system contract at all since both parties didn't agree on the same final version. The entire story is not game over as per his 'exhaustively detailed definitions of it', while he didn't wait for you to quit GLP. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78773500 United States04/24/2020 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seventh Head barred the word 'New' and let 'Orleans event' in your text. Without him adding 'Orleans, France' in his PSes, it could have been Orleans (island of), Quebec, or Orleans, Ontario. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] The point is that you have no choice but to accept or deny all his PSes without Seventh Head signing a new version, what is too late since he is gone forever. In both cases, the contract is null and void because you disagree with a part of the PSes when he can't sign anything new. When you said 'also, as part of that affidavit, I'll wait until 11:59:59pm on the 21st on this post to hear if it happened or not (not waiting for MSM)', you were wrong for both HIS affidavit and YOUR decision. There were lie and unilateralism. You therefore clearly acknowledged that he added his PS about the MSM dates, but preferred to reject it. YOUR choice. 'Hearing' being NOT in the contract, as far as you are strictly unable to provide evidence that the event didn't take place on April 21, or within his time frame, up to April 26, you're forced to wait for news in the MSM, provided that you look for the proper newspaper, radio and/or TV to check whether or not the event has taken place. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] As a matter of fact, Seventh Head wrote about three hours later: 'It doesn't happen and my interpretation is not the good one because we would go beyond the deadline of May 2 2020 for the start of the 1,260 days of the Two Witnesses, basics of my whole prophecies interpretation'. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] So, we are back to what he said - your opinion and means of 'evidence' being totally irrelevant - in terms of deadline of May 02 and news in the MSM by April 26. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77342954 United States04/24/2020 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78836328 United States04/24/2020 01:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We are only in the middle of the first wave of the covid-19, with its dramatic outcomes for the people's health, the full collapsing of the world economy and social unrest, triggering 99% of the GLP threads, and the OP's end times scenario, including it and fulfilled until now, would be stupid?  The stakes of the Orleans UFO event date go beyond what you're able to reach, apparently. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78836328 United States04/24/2020 02:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/24/2020 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In case you forgot your own draft, Jordan, you wrote: 'New Orleans event happens...' Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78773500 Seventh Head barred the word 'New' and let 'Orleans event' in your text. Without him adding 'Orleans, France' in his PSes, it could have been Orleans (island of), Quebec, or Orleans, Ontario. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] The point is that you have no choice but to accept or deny all his PSes without Seventh Head signing a new version, what is too late since he is gone forever. In both cases, the contract is null and void because you disagree with a part of the PSes when he can't sign anything new. When you said 'also, as part of that affidavit, I'll wait until 11:59:59pm on the 21st on this post to hear if it happened or not (not waiting for MSM)', you were wrong for both HIS affidavit and YOUR decision. There were lie and unilateralism. You therefore clearly acknowledged that he added his PS about the MSM dates, but preferred to reject it. YOUR choice. 'Hearing' being NOT in the contract, as far as you are strictly unable to provide evidence that the event didn't take place on April 21, or within his time frame, up to April 26, you're forced to wait for news in the MSM, provided that you look for the proper newspaper, radio and/or TV to check whether or not the event has taken place. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] As a matter of fact, Seventh Head wrote about three hours later: 'It doesn't happen and my interpretation is not the good one because we would go beyond the deadline of May 2 2020 for the start of the 1,260 days of the Two Witnesses, basics of my whole prophecies interpretation'. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] So, we are back to what he said - your opinion and means of 'evidence' being totally irrelevant - in terms of deadline of May 02 and news in the MSM by April 26. This is so obviously the OP it's mind boggling. why play the games?... @Godsarmymilitia |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78171196  Canada04/24/2020 05:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/24/2020 05:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | any particle of the lords is a particle of love, and every particle of love is the lords, even them, and they told us themselves they follow the lord with a crop circle once, and they only have to speak once, and have never harmed us once despite easily being able to, they are not evil Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78171196 Son the aliens tried to invade and wipe us out. the only reason you aren't alien food is because of my army... @Godsarmymilitia |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/24/2020 05:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78837409 United States04/24/2020 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | any particle of the lords is a particle of love, and every particle of love is the lords, even them, and they told us themselves they follow the lord with a crop circle once, and they only have to speak once, and have never harmed us once despite easily being able to, they are not evil Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78171196  Some aliens are evil though. Their number is conversely proportional to those of the evil humans. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78474860 United States04/24/2020 10:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| J0RDAN
User ID: 75686950 United States04/25/2020 12:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In case you forgot your own draft, Jordan, you wrote: 'New Orleans event happens...' Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78773500 Seventh Head barred the word 'New' and let 'Orleans event' in your text. Without him adding 'Orleans, France' in his PSes, it could have been Orleans (island of), Quebec, or Orleans, Ontario. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] The point is that you have no choice but to accept or deny all his PSes without Seventh Head signing a new version, what is too late since he is gone forever. In both cases, the contract is null and void because you disagree with a part of the PSes when he can't sign anything new. When you said 'also, as part of that affidavit, I'll wait until 11:59:59pm on the 21st on this post to hear if it happened or not (not waiting for MSM)', you were wrong for both HIS affidavit and YOUR decision. There were lie and unilateralism. You therefore clearly acknowledged that he added his PS about the MSM dates, but preferred to reject it. YOUR choice. 'Hearing' being NOT in the contract, as far as you are strictly unable to provide evidence that the event didn't take place on April 21, or within his time frame, up to April 26, you're forced to wait for news in the MSM, provided that you look for the proper newspaper, radio and/or TV to check whether or not the event has taken place. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] As a matter of fact, Seventh Head wrote about three hours later: 'It doesn't happen and my interpretation is not the good one because we would go beyond the deadline of May 2 2020 for the start of the 1,260 days of the Two Witnesses, basics of my whole prophecies interpretation'. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] So, we are back to what he said - your opinion and means of 'evidence' being totally irrelevant - in terms of deadline of May 02 and news in the MSM by April 26. Um, yeah, no.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78460086 United States04/25/2020 05:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/25/2020 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78841129 United States04/25/2020 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| King Triad
User ID: 77970497 United States04/25/2020 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone serious and impartial sum up what this thread is all about? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78460086  Thread is about the op and his girl Eve getting picked up by a ship in Orleans ,France April 21st. then they will become William and Kate and little George will be Christ... @Godsarmymilitia |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78487344 United States04/26/2020 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 'CO' means 'ensemble' (together) in Latin. 'VID' is 'Dix' (ten) in Latin. 1 + 9 = 10. VIRAL = AVRIL (April) in Latin. CROWN = CORONA in Latin. There are only TWO dates in a month when two numbers equal ten: 19 and 28 (2 + 8 = 10). Twice ('CO') 10 and 10 = 2020. The full meaning is APRIL 28 2020. What this date is about? April 29 2020 is the 9th anniversary (one 'nine': 19) of the wedding (CO) of William and Kate (CROWN) watched all over the world (VIRAL) on TV (VID). [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] This wedding was announced on NOV 16 2010, date when the OP arrived at Orleans in France...  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78487344 United States04/26/2020 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is there a code with COVID-19 in Latin? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78487344 'CO' means 'ensemble' (together) in Latin. 'VID' is 'Dix' (ten) in Latin. 1 + 9 = 10. VIRAL = AVRIL (April) in Latin. CROWN = CORONA in Latin. There are only TWO dates in a month when two numbers equal ten: 19 and 28 (2 + 8 = 10). Twice ('CO') 10 and 10 = 2020. The full meaning is APRIL 28 2020. What this date is about? April 29 2020 is the 9th anniversary (one 'nine': 19) of the wedding (CO) of William and Kate (CROWN) watched all over the world (VIRAL) on TV (VID). [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] This wedding was announced on NOV 16 2010, date when the OP arrived at Orleans in France... Seventh Head spoke about a key alien intelligence: 'we will come to take you on December 31st'. Isn't April 28th 2020 'December 31st' of William's and Kate's wedding, those they must replace? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78843958 United States04/26/2020 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is there a code with COVID-19 in Latin? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78487344 'CO' means 'ensemble' (together) in Latin. 'VID' is 'Dix' (ten) in Latin. 1 + 9 = 10. VIRAL = AVRIL (April) in Latin. CROWN = CORONA in Latin. There are only TWO dates in a month when two numbers equal ten: 19 and 28 (2 + 8 = 10). Twice ('CO') 10 and 10 = 2020. The full meaning is APRIL 28 2020. What this date is about? April 29 2020 is the 9th anniversary (one 'nine': 19) of the wedding (CO) of William and Kate (CROWN) watched all over the world (VIRAL) on TV (VID). [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] This wedding was announced on NOV 16 2010, date when the OP arrived at Orleans in France... Seventh Head spoke about a key alien intelligence: 'we will come to take you on December 31st'. Isn't April 28th 2020 'December 31st' of William's and Kate's wedding, those they must replace? That's smart! The 28th pushed me to look for OP's posts. Look here: .../... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74996941 - In 2015, Eve heard two extraterrestrial women talking together. One of them said to the other (knowing that Eve heard them): 'she will be happy to know that she has rendez-vous with the moon of the 28th the 7th' (in French 'du 28 au 7'). Eve has a daughter, Julie, born on 28/7. Last April 8, after the 7th, was the full moon the day one celebrates Saint Julie! .../... Here it is. April 7th 2020 was the 14th anniversary of the first right door, those of the May 25th 2006 Conditional Tsunami Alert, as per the OP. The 28th is 21 days after the 7th. It means that OP was wrong about April 21. He had to add 21 days to this first right door date, twice 7 years later, i.e. April 28th. This date is still in the lock-down period for which they had many visions, including this one: Here are some visions that pinpoint to this historical period of lock-downs: Quoting: SEVENTH HEAD .../... 7 - Eve watches the TV displaying the beaches of Deauville in Normandy. Something seems strange. The people enjoying life and the children are all clothed like in the 20's, a century ago. Suddenly, a kind of wish card comes to her out the TV. The wish card is opened. Inside, on the left side she reads in French 'vous partez' ('you leave'). On the right side she reads in English: 'Tuesday'. Between the two expressions is the folding line. .../... April 28th is a Tuesday... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78843958 United States04/26/2020 01:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From October 31 excluded... .../... Quoting: SEVENTH HEAD in the October 31st 2016 vision where the 'Boss' told me 'Christ arrives the 5th', before receiving from that same 'Boss' a piece of paper where were written '6/7', then '01/02' .../... to April 28th excluded... .../... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74996941 - In 2015, Eve heard two extraterrestrial women talking together. One of them said to the other (knowing that Eve heard them): 'she will be happy to know that she has rendez-vous with the moon of the 28th the 7th' (in French 'du 28 au 7'). Eve has a daughter, Julie, born on 28/7. Last April 8, after the 7th, was the full moon the day one celebrates Saint Julie! .../... there are exactly 179 days: .../... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74996941 - In 2011, I was in a corridor at the end of which was an end wall on which were the big number '179', an arrow toward the left side up and the big word 'EXIT'. On the left side, before the end wall, was a stair leading to a bright light. .../... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78510904 United States04/26/2020 05:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Here what Seventh Head wrote:
