Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,441 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 54,176
Pageviews Today: 107,252Threads Today: 47Posts Today: 809
01:31 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

2015 Nature journal article: Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research

 
Boaty

User ID: 77825331
United States
03/10/2020 01:28 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
2015 Nature journal article: Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
[link to www.nature.com (secure)]

Lab-made coronavirus related to SARS can infect human cells.

An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.

In an article published in Nature Medicine1 on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them.

Although almost all coronaviruses isolated from bats have not been able to bind to the key human receptor, SHC014 is not the first that can do so. In 2013, researchers reported this ability for the first time in a different coronavirus isolated from the same bat population.

The findings reinforce suspicions that bat coronaviruses capable of directly infecting humans (rather than first needing to evolve in an intermediate animal host) may be more common than previously thought, the researchers say.

But other virologists question whether the information gleaned from the experiment justifies the potential risk. Although the extent of any risk is difficult to assess, Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, points out that the researchers have created a novel virus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells. “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” he says.

Read more: [link to www.nature.com (secure)]

Last Edited by BoatyMcBoatface on 03/10/2020 01:28 AM
````````````````
````__/\__``````
~~~\____/~~~~
.~~..~~~....~​~~
~..~~~....~~~~

Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie.
- 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78090287
United States
03/10/2020 01:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2015 Nature journal article: Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
I read the N.Carol. one.
Scary people.
Boaty  (OP)

User ID: 77825331
United States
03/10/2020 10:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 2015 Nature journal article: Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
Bump for the morning... This is pretty clear proof it's a manmade virus, as if there was any doubt.
````````````````
````__/\__``````
~~~\____/~~~~
.~~..~~~....~​~~
~..~~~....~~~~

Thoughts do not come from you nor God; you do not create thoughts; you are not your thoughts; every thought is a lie.
- 2 Corinthians 10:5 - [link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)]





GLP