Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,164 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 426,644
Pageviews Today: 712,942Threads Today: 276Posts Today: 4,507
09:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78383939
Israel
08/04/2022 03:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81216008
Brazil
08/04/2022 04:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80445546
Italy
08/04/2022 01:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77927952
Bulgaria
08/06/2022 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
What if COVID Outbreak Is Part of the Pentagon's Biowarfare Plan?



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82589473
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83978859
United States
08/07/2022 04:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
What if COVID Outbreak Is Part of the Pentagon's Biowarfare Plan?



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82589473

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77927952


bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83940588
Russia
08/08/2022 03:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
What if COVID Outbreak Is Part of the Pentagon's Biowarfare Plan?



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82589473

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77927952


putin-thiss
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83989666
08/09/2022 02:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Most definitely
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76861674
Norway
08/13/2022 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80445546


Even bitchute is into the censoring shit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76243051
Germany
08/15/2022 12:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
What if COVID Outbreak Is Part of the Pentagon's Biowarfare Plan?



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82589473

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77927952


No brainer
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76861656
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11877986
New Zealand
08/18/2022 05:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Sars cov-2 is a ccp hoax
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 67885677
Canada
08/18/2022 09:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
wtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80153014
Australia
08/20/2022 05:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
been sayn this since day 1 - you cant force vaccinate a non-fda approved vaccine. you also cant force vax if theres known cures n therapies which there is, regeneron, hcq, ivermectin et al in addition trump signed the right to try act in 20 - its a felony to use coercion under us code 50.23 + 50.24. **In Pennsylvania, on Oct 11/2017 Gov Tom Wolf signed EO whereas anyone wanting to participate in a clinical trial it is deemed a VOLUNTARY PROGRAM. California has a similar law.

If you were fired from your job - SUE!! you have grounds. cant trump congress.

Did you know federal law explicitly states that “participation [in experimental COVID-19 drugs] is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled?” Congress passed the National Research Act in ’74, declaring that an individual may not be administered an experimental drug if they are under “sanctions,” “coercion,” or “undue influence.”


Government agencies (e.g., VA, ICE, FSA) administrators and supervisors are at risk of prosecution by State Attorneys General for violating international treaties, federal statutes, state statutes and regulations for penalizing employees who refuse to participate in a COVID-19 experimental substance.

Private corporations are also at risk of significant remedial actions in civil courts for violating the federally protected rights of citizens to refuse COVID-19 experimental substance administration without incurring a penalty or losing a benefit to which citizens are otherwise entitled.

Both aforementioned entities have assaulted the fundamental 14th Amendment rights of citizens to be treated equally before the law. They have also potentially committed felonies under health privacy statutes. This document will present the facts to substantiate these claims so that authorities may take appropriate action to remedy the injustice perpetrated against law-abiding citizens.

Please note there are several statutory laws involved in products authorized for access under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The author’s desire is to provide a basic understanding of those statutes to better understand how they interconnect, as well as the indisputable right to refuse an experimental substance without incurring a penalty.

COVID-19 VACCINE FACTS
An IND is legally defined as “a substance that has been tested in the laboratory and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for testing in people. Also
called an experimental drug, IND, investigational agent, and investigational new drug (National Cancer Institute (NCI) Dictionary of Cancer Terms, 2022).” To involve a
human in an investigational new drug under any element of research is legally considered medical experimentation. No FDA-licensed and approved vaccines are known to be available to individuals subjected to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. As of August 15, 2022, only COVID-19 Investigational New Drugs (IND) are commercially available to American citizens.

UNDERSTANDING SECTION 564
21 U.S. Code contains a set of statutes providing the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary authority to grant Americans access to experimental medical products
when certain conditions warrant. Some of those conditions might be the medical requirements of an individual; small investigatory research group; or under emergency
access protocols. 21 U.S. Code §360bbb-3 (Section 564) provides the HHS Secretary authority to grant Americans access to experimental medical products under a provision
known as “broad access” when a medical emergency has been declared.

Congress requires the HHS Secretary to assign a classification to each medical product before access is granted (§360bbb-2) so that government entities understand the regulatory framework for legal purposes. Without such classification, government entities have no authority over those substances. Furthermore, courts could not adjudicate litigation for respective administrative duties because the source of authority is derived from drug classification statutes and regulations.

Congress requires the HHS Secretary to issue an EUA letter to the pharmaceutical company requesting one of their products to be utilized for emergency purposes if the
Secretary believes the product “may have benefit” for its intended purpose.

Congress restricts the HHS Secretary from issuing an EUA if a FDA-licensed and approved product already exists in the market. Therefore, once a COVID-19 FDA-licensed product reaches the market, the authority to issue an EUA for the current pandemic automatically ends by statute.

REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF SECTION 564 AUTHORIZATION
1) Congress requires the HHS Secretary to issue a Scope of
Authorization outlining the regulatory requirements to be followed by all parties that “volunteer” to participate (e.g., emergency stakeholders, pharmaceutical companies, distributors, health care providers).

2) Congress requires the following information to be provided to
individuals participating in the medical product:
a) That HHS Secretary has authorized access
b) Risks and benefits of the product
c) The option to accept or refuse the product (informed
consent)
d) Consequences (health) of not taking the product
e) Alternatives to the product
f) Risks and benefits of those alternatives
3) Congress requires the HHS Secretary to ensure “appropriate
conditions on who may administer the product with respect to the emergency use of the product, and on the categories of individuals to whom, and the circumstances under which, the product may be administered with respect to such use.”

4) Congress requires the HHS Secretary to guarantee “appropriate conditions with respect to collection and analysis of information
concerning the safety and effectiveness of the product with respect to the use of such product during the period when the authorization is in effect and a reasonable time following such period.”

5) Congress notified the nation that, “nothing in this section provides the HHS Secretary any authority to require any person to carry out any activity that becomes lawful pursuant to an authorization
under this section.” This is a required statement because of liability immunities granted to participating entities including pharmaceutical companies.

Section 564 only grants the HHS Secretary authority to provide Americans access to experimental products during a declared emergency; Congress made no other claim.
Congress requires the Secretary to establish the circumstances under which Section 564 COVID-19 vaccines may be administered and denies authority to the Secretary to
require anyone to participate in those products.
No Governor, CEO, or federal agency Director will be able to declare any statute in Section 564 provides them authority to require participation under duress in EUA substances.

The FDA declares that informed consent is not “generally” required under Section 564 –
a legal fallacy. Suppose a chemical, biological, radiological, and or nuclear (CBRN) event releases an unknown agent causing significant harm to a large population who are all seeking immediate health care. In that case, the HHS Secretary can remove the “informed” part of the equation if not practical, but is never authorized to remove the
right of consent from any individual.

Some attorneys unethically construe the word “consequences” to mean civil violation. However, this is judicial heresy of the highest order. Section 564 does not authorize any
person to enforce participation under duress. Such arguments conflict with Congress providing individuals with the “option to accept and refuse” emergency-use products.
Furthermore, civil infractions and/or criminal violations must be authorized by a legislative body and pre-published to have the force of law. Congress did not legislate
penalties for non-participation. In 2007 the FDA guided authorities to notify individuals of the “consequences of not taking / using [product], including possible health effects...and of stopping the use of [product] against the recommendation of the
health care provider.”

PFIZER EUA
On August 23, 2021, the FDA issued an EUA letter to Pfizer for their BioNTech
COVID-19 Vaccine. Some of the FDA listed requirements under its Scope of
Authorization include:

1) “Pfizer Inc. must submit an Investigational New Drug application (IND) number 19736.” This was the HHS Secretary assigning an IND classification to Pfizer’s experimental substance complying with Section 564 requirements.
2) All printed matter relating to the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine shall clearly and conspicuously state that: “This product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA.”
3) That “product-specific information required to be made available to vaccination providers and recipients” known as the Drug Fact Sheet.

INTERCHANGEABILITY
The FDA provided notice to Pfizer on August 23, 2021, that both of their COVID-19 vaccines (i.e., COMIRNATY and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine) have the same formulation and may be used interchangeably to fulfill the vaccination series. That same day, Pfizer issued a press release echoing that statement saying, "the FDA-approved COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the EUA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series. An individual may be offered either COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine
to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2."

Pfizer, Inc. defines interchangeably as an option to use either the experimental or the approved vaccine to fulfill the same medical purpose. Therefore, this scientific
statement is explicitly related to their products and may not be utilized by authorities as the legal basis to bypass statutes protecting human subjects involved in INDs under an
EUA.

Neither private business (e.g., Pfizer, Inc.) nor government entities (e.g., FDA) have the authority to exempt themselves from congressional statutes governing the administration of EUA substances. COVID-19 vaccines classified by the FDA as an IND require the informed consent of the individual before their administration. This requirement is based on drug classification irrespective of another drug sharing the same formula. Congress did not provide a statute allowing an experimental substance to be used as a full licensure drug based on formulation.

Health care providers must administer the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine according to the Scope of Authorization outlined in the FDA’s EUA (i.e., during a declared public health emergency). However, those health care providers are not under such requirements when administering the FDA-approved COMIRNATY despite both vaccines sharing the same formulation. This legal fact demonstrates the requirement of
Congress for authorities to abide by a drug label and not a drug’s formulation.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) will not be able to produce a single federal statute providing an exemption from informed consent requirements based on a formula. All
such statutes are based on the product’s labeling, which is why the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) only provided guidance based on voluntary participation.

The CDC never issued guidance requiring compliance under threat of penalty and conspicuously stated, “...with vaccine being provided by the federal government ─ to ensure all people in the United States who wish to be vaccinated can receive vaccines without barriers, to the greatest extent possible.” The declaration of “who wish” is required by statute because their recommendations include both FDA-licensed and FDA-classified experimental substances.

Neither government nor corporate leaders are able to produce a single statute or FDA
guidance legally authorizing utilization of classified experimental substances “as if” they
are full licensure drugs for legal purposes of vaccine mandates.

Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccines may share the same formulation, but they do not share the same classification. On August 23, 2021 the FDA informed governments
and corporations of the two drugs’ legal distinctions because these have significant legal consequences for citizens depending on their choice.

Can statutes associated with Pfizer COMIRNATY be used interchangeably with statutes that govern Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in a court of law because they share
the same formulation? Absolutely not! A competent judge would immediately dismiss such a claim. Lawyers guiding governmental and corporate entities to use a non-approved substance as if it is a full-licensure drug for purposes of legal mandates should be disbarred for abject failure to distinguish the proper course of action as written.


Legal Fact #1: Congress explicitly provided Americans with the absolute right to refuse participation in EUA experimental products.
There does not exist a legal means by which authorities can mandate participation under threat of penalty. The interchangeable argument was pre-planned to confuse an entire nation about their right to refuse COVID-19 IND vaccines. Simply because the FDA and Pfizer declare that both substances fulfill the same medical purpose does not confer authority by statute to
subject Americans to medical experimentation without their free will and voluntary consent. Furthermore, Pfizer has yet to ship COMIRNATY, so it is physically impossible to use both substances ‘interchangeably’ for any purpose.

the rest of the pdf IS HERE [link to covidpenalty.com]

:Truth-bombb:
 Quoting: Phennommennonn


[link to godlike.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76939927
United States
08/20/2022 07:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
CCP BS
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76038885
Canada
08/21/2022 01:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84045028
Saudi Arabia
08/22/2022 03:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
trump-HRYK
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12765542
Moldova
08/22/2022 10:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76038885


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83719830
08/23/2022 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
U don’t know half the story
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84061915
United States
08/24/2022 04:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
U don’t know half the story
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83719830


Go on...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81689054
08/24/2022 10:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
dick
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76861656
Belgium
08/25/2022 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76862668
Belgium
08/25/2022 09:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Biowarfare labs around the world. Offshore! Outsourced!

Brilliant!!!!


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78848181
Netherlands
08/27/2022 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Alien diseases and pathogens?


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75023817
United States
09/08/2022 04:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
wtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76015367
United Kingdom
09/09/2022 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
BS
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84051904
United States
09/10/2022 06:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Chicom lies
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77500865
Finland
09/12/2022 01:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47674101


[link to godlike.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84199102
Russia
09/15/2022 01:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84199102




American Special Forces Trying To Cover Up SARS COV-2 storage in JeWUkraine?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80747342
Hong Kong
09/16/2022 05:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
[link to godlike.com (secure)]

The Lancet Opens Pandora's Box, Suggests COVID Could Have Originated In US Labs manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses," among other possibilities




After providing a platform for a massive 'Natural Origins' Covid-19 disinformation campaign by EcoHealth Alliance head Peter Daszak, The Lancet appears to have done a 180 - suggesting Covid-19 may have originated "in US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses," among other possibilities.


"No independent, transparent, and science-based investigation has been carried out regarding the bioengineering of SARS-like viruses that was underway before the outbreak of COVID-19," writes The Lancet's Covid-19 commission, following two years of work.

"Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses, nor have they investigated the details of the laboratory research that had been underway in Wuhan. Moreover, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has resisted disclosing details of the research on SARS-CoV-related viruses that it had been supporting, providing extensively redacted information only as required by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits."

Regular readers will recall that four months before the Obama administration outlawed 'gain-of-function' research on US soil, EcoHealth landed a lucrative NIH contract to offshore the risky research to Wuhan, China - where he was tasked with manipulating bat COVID to be more transmissible to humans.


[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]
 Quoting: COVID 19 SERIAL KILLER 83909003
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81371545
Hong Kong
09/16/2022 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
Time Traveler or Insane Psychic Calls Death of Queen on Exact Day 7 Months Ago


IMAGE ( [link to i.imgur.com (secure)] )


REMINDS OF CORONAVIRUS PREDICTION 100% ACCURATE IN 2019
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84119114


It's in a foreign language that I don't understand.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83861127





google translate


Decipher:

11.06.2019

#US sent a planeload of biological weapons to China. Pandemics may soon begin in China.

Let them not forget that if there is a Turk on earth, there is hope.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84119114
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77927952
Bulgaria
09/17/2022 02:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: AMERICAN BIOWARFARE PATHOGEN SARS COV-2, CREATED AT FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND NOW WREAKING HAVOC GLOBALLY
BOMBSHELL – FINALLY THE UGLY TRUTH COMES OUT – IT’S A U.S. VIRUS! COVID-19 LEAKED FROM A U.S. LABORATORY, NOT FROM WUHAN OR ‘OUT OF NATURE’, SAYS THE PRESTIGIOUS LANCET MEDICAL JOURNAL AFTER A 2-YEAR STUDY LED BY 28 TOP INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONERS – ‘EVERYONE HAS SIGNED OFF ON THE TEXT’ – PRESSURE MOUNTS ON U.S. FLUNKEY W.H.O TO PUSH FOR INVESTIGATIONS INTO LABS IN AMERICA – ESPECIALLY FORT DETRICK, THE FORMER CENTRE FOR U.S. BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PROGRAMME – NO WONDER, CHINA IS SO CAUTIOUS & INSISTENT ON ‘ZERO COVID’ – GOD ONLY KNOWS WHAT FURTHER MUTATIONS & HARM THE U.S. VIRUS CAN WREAK


For more than two years, the world was being told by the Western powers, led by the United States, that the Coronovirus was unleashed by the Chinese. Because the WHO (World Health Organization) received the first alerts of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan, China on Dec 30, 2019, it didn’t take much hard work to put all the blames on China.

Against the powerful Western news media, China was fighting a losing battle in its denials. On Wednesday (Sept 14, 2022), The Lancet released an extremely damaging report titled – “Lessons for the Future from the Covid-19 Pandemic” – that says the pandemic may have originated with a pathogen leaked from a US laboratory, instead of China as widely propagated.

The bombshell revelations from the prestigious English weekly medical journal, as expected, has invited criticisms from the West. After all, The Lancet was one of the oldest – the world’s highest-impact medical journal – leading research publications since 1823. It was founded by Thomas Wakley, an English surgeon who named it after the surgical instrument called a lancet.

The Lancet Covid-19 Commission was established in July, 2020, with four main themes – developing recommendations on how to best suppress the epidemic, addressing the humanitarian crises arising from the pandemic, addressing the financial and economic crises resulting from the pandemic, and rebuilding an inclusive, fair, and sustainable world.

The 58-page Commission report mentions laboratories in Wuhan, China, where the virus was initially reported to have jumped from animals to humans at a wet market. But the report also states that “independent researchers have not yet investigated” US labs and that the National Institutes of Health has “resisted disclosing details” of its work on viruses related to SARS-CoV.

While the WHO had sent teams to China to find the source of the virus as early as 6 months since the Coronavirus outbreak, not a single investigation has been launched to investigate whether the outbreak could have originated on American soil because it was easy to point fingers at China. Crucially, why the U.S. NIH has refused to cooperate in disclosing details if they are really innocent?

The Lancet stated in its report that the 28 Commissioners are global experts in public policy, international cooperation, epidemiology and vaccinology, economic and financial systems, sustainability sciences, and mental health. The Commissioners oversaw the work of 12 thematic Task Forces, of which included a total of 173 experts in producing many Covid-19 reports.

At a conference in Madrid in May this year, the Commission chairman and Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs said he was “convinced” that SARS-Cov-2 “came out of a U.S. lab of biotechnology, not out of nature”. In August, he appeared on a podcast hosted by Robert F Kennedy, Jr (a son of U.S. senator Robert F. Kennedy and a nephew of President John F. Kennedy) to discuss his beliefs.

Prof Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization in Canada, have slammed the Lancet’s report as “shameful”. Prof David Robertson of the University of Glasgow’s Centre for Virus Research said – “It’s really disappointing to see such a potentially influential report contributing to further misinformation on such an important topic.”

However, none of those so-called experts could explain why the U.S. should not be fairly investigated if indeed the objective is purely science and medical – not political – to prevent another similar outbreak. Exactly why the Western scientists have no problem believing that the virus must have originated from China, but go ballistic at the suggestion that it could also originate from the U.S.?

Defending the report, Prof Sachs said – “Everybody has signed off on the final text. The question of a possible laboratory release mostly involves the question of US-China joint work that was underway on SARS-like viruses”. The Commission made 11 recommendations, including stronger regulation of the wild animal trade, the creation of a new WHO biosecurity oversight authority and better international coordination

[link to www.malaysia-chronicle.com (secure)]





GLP