Magnetosphere Watch!!!!! Something this way doomy comes?? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77479307 United States 04/23/2020 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78836151 Australia 04/24/2020 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Weird in this movie from 2008 many things that are in there are happing now. The harmful radiation from space started in 2009. And its getting worse. Soooo... never make a good crises go to waste. Using this radiation that no one can do anything about they are using it to implement a police state which has allways been their wet dream. Thanks op. Movie all based on Velikovsky's theories and which we are seeing played out before our very eyes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76911997 United Kingdom 04/24/2020 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: VagyokAkiVagyok You keep posting this very same sentence every time that name comes up. Also, you start with an insult.... as usual. [link to blogs.psychcentral.com (secure)] "(Narcissists) will use various manipulation and abuse tactics like name calling, mocking... or plain verbal abuse" You're in no position to complain about insults when you immediately insult me. Stop whining about insults. Eric Briggs is a moron. He tried to spam the everliving shit out of my channel, He's not even supposed to be on YouTube, he was banned by YouTube for doing it. If you want to die on the hill of defending him, keep at it and see what happens. I don’t even know who that person is, but now that I see how hard you’re trying to discredit him, I’m pretty sure that he’s got some important things to say and I will definitely check him out. Thanks a lot for bringing him to my attention! Good, it will make you dumber and easier to own. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78279394 United States 04/24/2020 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Astromut If I only knew how to observe, then how is it I'm able to predict as well? I'm able to predict the orientation of the moon mathematically precisely because I'm able to understand the cause. Thanks for demonstrating Dunning-Kruger for us. Oh I love references to the DK effect. It's the Jesus of you skeptics. In that case astrodog, would be so kind as to explain to us the mechanism by which gravity works? I love watching you dance and try to change the subject. You still haven't explained how I'm able to predict the basic motion and apparent orientation of the moon. You haven't even mastered that so you're definitely not ready for me to start talking to you about how gravity works. So go on answer my question, it was not rhetorical nor was it optional. How am I able to mathematically predict the apparent orientation of the moon? Alright, you got an obvious chip on your shoulder so I'll bite. You're golden star achievement seems to be tracking the moon's rotation. Congratulations, you've managed to track the largest celestial object in the sky with the most uniform of rotation using modern technology. You've accomplished what others have done in the past using nothing more than a clay pendulum. Hats off to you. I'm sure you are far too super smart to get drawn into a discussion about the moon using observable facts; such a the moon is either hollow or honeycombed; or that the gravity around the moon is incredibly inconsistent; or that the moon shouldn't even be where it is according to our current understanding of celestial physics. I'm sure any such discussion would be immediately dismissed by you as DK pseudo fringe science because the denial of openly observable facts is what modern science has been reduced to. No, you much rather sit on your high horse using computing models other people built, that you've just inherited or at best tweaked, and used it to proclaim yourself king of the intellectual castle in this small corner of the internet. Am I taking away from your technical prowess? No. You clearly have skills in programming and other areas that allow you to do this. So why am I having a go at you? Because you dismiss others you think below you, and you do it in the way most of you normie science geeks do, you blind yourselves to observable evidence and ignore it in favour of models that are full of holes but are so entrenched by the academic authorities that you use their authority to lamblast others who can challenge those models with observable facts. You're the problem with modern science. How does someone being banned from YouTube make them wrong? It doesn't. Something something appeal to authority fallacy. Which I'm sure you'd be all to keen to throw in someone's face in another argument, just not when it's you using it. You refuse to actually try and understand what it is you are studying, you'd rather just use tools and theorems already built that you imbue with sacrosanct value, never looking at what's underneath the hood. That's what I mean when I ask you about causes as opposed to effects. You can observe effects. Good for you. You use modern computing algorithms, others can use a pendulum made of clay. Do you understand the cause of the effect you're observing? Absolutely not. Your accuracy comes from the calibre of your tools, not the depths of your understand. There is a world of difference there. careful with such brazen posts, dr shill will scrub it and ban yo ass friend |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78279394 United States 04/24/2020 12:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Chaosisfreedom Alright, you got an obvious chip on your shoulder so I'll bite. You're golden star achievement seems to be tracking the moon's rotation. Congratulations, you've managed to track the largest celestial object in the sky with the most uniform of rotation using modern technology. You've accomplished what others have done in the past using nothing more than a clay pendulum. Hats off to you. Wrong. That is not even what I was asking about. Try again and this time actually read the question. how am I able to mathematically predict the apparent orientation of the moon? It does not require any technology, it's a mathematical prediction which I have verified with observational evidence. It also has nothing to do with any physical rotation of the moon. Thank you for once again demonstrating how perfect an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect you are. I think you've misunderstood me here. At no point am I asking you how you do any of the things that contribute to your superiority complex. The only question I'm asking is if you understand the cause of the phenomenon, rather then the effect. And at each point so far you have not addressed that question. What you have done is continually attacked me as a person and evaded answering my question. So, once again, do you understand the cause here? If so, care to illuminate us? Or is it your personal trade secret? Would you rather continually dodge the question in favour of shooting off more insults about how no one else but you understands the world around them? That's how these online "experts" function. Always dodging real questions, while clinging to parts of your comments and calling you names based on that. Here's the perfect description for this from a mental health coach: "A lot of them actually work in the helping, teaching, and medical fields or pretend to be experts and intellectuals on social media. Some of them are really smart, eloquent, and popular, which makes their statements more believable to an unaware audience. They can learn all these fancy terms and phrases, yet they often don’t understand or even care about how to apply them correctly." [link to blogs.psychcentral.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74385247 United States 04/24/2020 12:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78840212 Hungary 04/25/2020 04:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Chaosisfreedom Oh I love references to the DK effect. It's the Jesus of you skeptics. In that case astrodog, would be so kind as to explain to us the mechanism by which gravity works? I love watching you dance and try to change the subject. You still haven't explained how I'm able to predict the basic motion and apparent orientation of the moon. You haven't even mastered that so you're definitely not ready for me to start talking to you about how gravity works. So go on answer my question, it was not rhetorical nor was it optional. How am I able to mathematically predict the apparent orientation of the moon? Alright, you got an obvious chip on your shoulder so I'll bite. You're golden star achievement seems to be tracking the moon's rotation. Congratulations, you've managed to track the largest celestial object in the sky with the most uniform of rotation using modern technology. You've accomplished what others have done in the past using nothing more than a clay pendulum. Hats off to you. I'm sure you are far too super smart to get drawn into a discussion about the moon using observable facts; such a the moon is either hollow or honeycombed; or that the gravity around the moon is incredibly inconsistent; or that the moon shouldn't even be where it is according to our current understanding of celestial physics. I'm sure any such discussion would be immediately dismissed by you as DK pseudo fringe science because the denial of openly observable facts is what modern science has been reduced to. No, you much rather sit on your high horse using computing models other people built, that you've just inherited or at best tweaked, and used it to proclaim yourself king of the intellectual castle in this small corner of the internet. Am I taking away from your technical prowess? No. You clearly have skills in programming and other areas that allow you to do this. So why am I having a go at you? Because you dismiss others you think below you, and you do it in the way most of you normie science geeks do, you blind yourselves to observable evidence and ignore it in favour of models that are full of holes but are so entrenched by the academic authorities that you use their authority to lamblast others who can challenge those models with observable facts. You're the problem with modern science. How does someone being banned from YouTube make them wrong? It doesn't. Something something appeal to authority fallacy. Which I'm sure you'd be all to keen to throw in someone's face in another argument, just not when it's you using it. You refuse to actually try and understand what it is you are studying, you'd rather just use tools and theorems already built that you imbue with sacrosanct value, never looking at what's underneath the hood. That's what I mean when I ask you about causes as opposed to effects. You can observe effects. Good for you. You use modern computing algorithms, others can use a pendulum made of clay. Do you understand the cause of the effect you're observing? Absolutely not. Your accuracy comes from the calibre of your tools, not the depths of your understand. There is a world of difference there. careful with such brazen posts, dr shill will scrub it and ban yo ass friend |
apple orchard
User ID: 76809044 United States 04/25/2020 05:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72490358 United States 04/26/2020 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Take a look at this. My heart was flip flopping so I looked at this and said, yep, there it is. We are taking bad hits right now. Hang in there everyone, I’m sure it will correct itself soon. Quoting: MrsTomatoHead [link to imgur.com (secure)] :JesusHempOK: |
HaChoo
User ID: 72376376 United States 05/15/2020 11:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm going to post links to explain what's going on. You can take it or leave it...but this is your answer. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75682040 [link to spaceweather.com (secure)] Look on the left hand column of the page and scroll down to "Oulu neutron counts". You will see that it says "very high" in RED. Look under that for the word "explanation" in BLUE. Click on that and it will be explained. This is your answer. HANDY |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79845297 United States 01/02/2021 11:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | your opening statement i think the moon is physically rolling , well i specifically say it isnt the moon rolling fuktard . you have to go stretching truths and making up lies to talk about me . that is slander and being as it is in writing about muh business. that makes it liable and you are now going to be prosecuted for it . ty astrofuk btw . if you could simply provide a simple NASA link expressing the lunar roll we witness globally nightly as normal you could have had my 1,000 dollars i have offered for it for over a year now . but you can not because indeed we should never see a rise wax roll 180 set wane , unless this planet tilted you incredibly virulent CIA troll [link to youtu.be (secure)] thousands have learned now to read hieroglyphs at a glance, if i were wrong . this would not be possible :D . |
Terrebonne
User ID: 79831214 United States 01/03/2021 12:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Extreme High Cosmic Ray counts over Rome [link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu] . INFJ; We are the protectors. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78759709 01/03/2021 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WDG
User ID: 79236984 Japan 01/03/2021 12:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dear OP, We are in fact in the second phase of geomagnetic reversal where a secondary magnetic dipole has formed over the past week as a result of the poleward push experenced by the Earth in the face of the mini-solar system with Nibiru and two other big planetary bodies on the outer orbits edging closer to the Earth on its way down the ecliptic and out of the Earth orbit within which it has been for the past 12 years since 2008 when it first crossed our orbit inward, having completed its orbit around the Sun between 14 Aug. 2015 and 26 Sept. 2015. I have just done this graph for my friends in China, so everything is in Chinese: [link to imgur.com (secure)] Jimmy Wang |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46398117 United States 02/09/2022 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |