astronomers base their electric universe suppositions on the spectro analysis of light glow surrounding distance galaxies.

plasma is ionized atoms, meaning that it's electron shell has been stripped. it is simply a nucleus. the most common ionized nucleus is hydrogen. the hydrogen nucleus as most elements have a positive charge. plasma is basically without structure and without structure incapable of any covalent bonding needed to carry a charge. electric theory requires bonding to be valid.

light carries no charge. it does charge anything that makes a connection to it. light sent through plasma gas charges the plasma, only then does plasma attract around a bonding agent in a coalescent fashion.

on it own plasma carries no properties that account for atomic weight, as atomic weight is a measure of the positive nucleus interaction with it's negative counterpart electrons. without an electron, a free floating positive nucleus cannot be weighted with any certainty as this requires a an electric interaction between a positive and negative charge. ascertaining weight is a function of gravity. ionized atoms without electrons are free floating. i.e. both hydrogen and helium beings the lightest of atoms float in the atmosphere. ionized atoms are even less restricted.

so you have, plasma free floating around a galaxy that electric universe astronomer claim account for the cohesiveness of the galaxy where regular gravity cannot be accounted for. their suppositions take no account of light adding charge to plasma. they simply state that the ionized free floating atoms are bound by an electric force they don't and can't account for. it's a huge missing variable in their suppositions. once again light does not have a charge. the light passing through a plasma cloud is enough to light up the plasma, it is not sufficient enough to coalesce it into a body capable if carrying a charge need to structure the galaxy. look it up. youre wrong, try again! lol