Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,403 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 424,100
Pageviews Today: 557,107Threads Today: 178Posts Today: 2,377
04:53 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject American Pravda: Our Coronavirus Catastrophe as Biowarfare Blowback?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...


Start at minute 16 of the video if you are short on time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79274772


The DOD is still disqualifying all recruits that have been hospitalized by SARS because the long term health implications are the most concerning aspect because of the devastation this virus inflicts on some patients while the members here cite death ratios as proof this is fake yet don’t realize that this BIOWEAPON will make you wish you were dead for some patients

Thread: Exposing Harvard's Chinese Agent And Nanoscientist Charles Lieber's "Virus Transmitters"
 Quoting: Anon Cow 76879020

The DOD know what this is. Some indications a “backburn” aerosolized viral vaccine is being spread through “protests” to mitigate damage.

The One Star Shill Team are trying to bury this already. They don’t want you to see this. The shadowgate shills will try to distract you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79274772


Genetic weapons
In 1997, U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen referred to the concept of an ethnic bioweapon as a possible risk. In 1998 some biological weapon experts considered such a "genetic weapon" plausible, and believed the former Soviet Union had undertaken some research on the influence of various substances on human genes.

In its 2000 policy paper Rebuilding America's Defenses, think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC) described ethnic bioweapons as a "politically useful tool" that US adversaries could have incentive to develop and utilize.
The possibility of a "genetic bomb" is presented in Vincent Sarich's and Frank Miele's book, Race: The Reality of Human Differences, published in 2004. These authors view such weapons as technically feasible but not very likely to be used. (page 248 of paperback edition.)

In 2004, The Guardian reported that the British Medical Association (BMA) considered bioweapons designed to target certain ethnic groups as a possibility, and highlighted problems that advances in science for such things as "treatment to Alzheimer's and other debilitating diseases could also be used for malign purposes”.

In 2005, the official view of the International Committee of the Red Cross was "The potential to target a particular ethnic group with a biological agent is probably not far off. These scenarios are not the product of the ICRC's imagination but have either occurred or been identified by countless independent and governmental experts.”

In 2008, the US government held a congressional committee, ‘Genetics and other human modification technologies: sensible international regulation or a new kind of arms race?’, during which it was discussed how “we can anticipate a world where rogue (and even not-so-rogue) states and non-state actors attempt to manipulate human genetics in ways that will horrify us”.

In 2012, The Atlantic wrote that a specific virus that targets individuals with a specific DNA sequence is within possibility in the near future. The magazine put forward a hypothetical scenario of a virus which caused mild flu to the general population but deadly symptoms to the President of the United States. They cite advances in personalized gene therapy as evidence.

In 2016, Foreign Policy magazine suggested the possibility of a virus used as an ethnic bioweapon that could sterilize a "genetically-related ethnic population.”

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79274772
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP