Documents Reveal Psyop Against UK Public to Induce Fear & Robotic Obedience

You're kidding, right?


What is up with the worship of the NHS?

This lockdown fear and paranoia has got out of hand.

I'm under attack right now on Twitter just for asking what's wrong with Boris Johnson's assistant taking his family to stay at their parents' farm (in a separate building), for which he's being investigated by the police!

The outrage! "Do you know its against the RULES!" "He went against the GUIDELINES!"

Geez, you'd think I said it was okay to commit murder. They're totally brainwashed. It's like being in Communist China..

[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

You're kidding, right?


What is up with the worship of the NHS?

This lockdown fear and paranoia has got out of hand.

I'm under attack right now on Twitter just for asking what's wrong with Boris Johnson's assistant taking his family to stay at their parents' farm (in a separate building), for which he's being investigated by the police!

The outrage! "Do you know its against the RULES!" "He went against the GUIDELINES!"

Geez, you'd think I said it was okay to commit murder. They're totally brainwashed. It's like being in Communist China..

[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

beats me. but serious, surely you UKTarts dont still clap do you?

I wasn't talking about which person it was, my point was about the outrage for disobeying 'the Rules', not just outrage but hysteria. It's like a re-run of the Salem Witch trials.

Over the course of the Covid-19 ‘crisis’, scientific advice to the UK Government has been co-ordinated by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). SAGE is co-chaired by Sir Patrick Vallance (the Government Chief Science Advisor) and Professor Chris Whitty (the Chief Medical Officer).

That group was reconvened on 13 February this year. This time, its remit was limited to behaviour and it was renamed the Scientific Pandemic Influenza group on Behaviour, or SPI-B.

SPI-B takes no part in discussion about which interventions are effective in dealing with the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’, or their timing. The group is tasked with providing advice on how to ‘help’ people to adhere to the interventions which government demands.

There are nine “broad ways” of achieving behaviour change, they write: Education, Persuasion, Incentivisation, Coercion, Enablement, Training, Restriction, Environmental restructuring, and Modelling.

“Social disapproval from one’s community,” they write, “can play an important role in preventing anti-social behaviour or discouraging failure to enact pro-social behaviour. However, this needs to be carefully managed to avoid victimisation, scapegoating and misdirected criticism. It needs to be accompanied by clear messaging and promotion of strong collective identity. Consideration should be given to use of social disapproval but with a strong caveat around unwanted negative consequences.”

Here, they make clear how they see the role of the media: not to hold government to account, but to act as a conduit for the ‘behavioural’ message (propaganda).

They recommend that the media is used:

to increase sense of personal threat
to increase sense of responsibility to others
to promote positive messaging around actions

50%

[link to 21stcenturywire.com (secure)]

Over the course of the Covid-19 ‘crisis’, scientific advice to the UK Government has been co-ordinated by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). SAGE is co-chaired by Sir Patrick Vallance (the Government Chief Science Advisor) and Professor Chris Whitty (the Chief Medical Officer).

That group was reconvened on 13 February this year. This time, its remit was limited to behaviour and it was renamed the Scientific Pandemic Influenza group on Behaviour, or SPI-B.

SPI-B takes no part in discussion about which interventions are effective in dealing with the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’, or their timing. The group is tasked with providing advice on how to ‘help’ people to adhere to the interventions which government demands.

There are nine “broad ways” of achieving behaviour change, they write: Education, Persuasion, Incentivisation, Coercion, Enablement, Training, Restriction, Environmental restructuring, and Modelling.

“Social disapproval from one’s community,” they write, “can play an important role in preventing anti-social behaviour or discouraging failure to enact pro-social behaviour. However, this needs to be carefully managed to avoid victimisation, scapegoating and misdirected criticism. It needs to be accompanied by clear messaging and promotion of strong collective identity. Consideration should be given to use of social disapproval but with a strong caveat around unwanted negative consequences.”

Here, they make clear how they see the role of the media: not to hold government to account, but to act as a conduit for the ‘behavioural’ message (propaganda).

They recommend that the media is used:

to increase sense of personal threat
to increase sense of responsibility to others
to promote positive messaging around actions

50%

[link to 21stcenturywire.com (secure)]