Trump to attend Nasa astronaut launch in Florida

so, we have advanced technology but they will put two Astronauts in a rocket style thing and launch them to space and that is considered a success? and then we have that Elon Musk that his dream is going to Mars, but can't even make a spaceship to go to the moon just for fun.

Sorry but it looks like a con job.

Logically with the advanced technology, by now they should have been sending spaceships for close missions, but still they can't, and now will successfully sent to the moon again? a rocket with two astronauts inside and that is a success?

Written it twice, do you believe a third time is enough to grasp how stupid that sounds from their part?

And don't speak about money, as you see they have no problem spending tens of trillions for a fake virus, so why not spending just one trillion for a real space exploration, doesn't look real actually, it's fake as the virus is fake.

So who's gonna throw the first intelligent sentence to prove wrong in the above thought?

Even the thing that orbits with astronauts inside and that dogmut says it's real, why do you believe just because you see it that it's real, through the telescopes. It could be just a nice holographic image of the space and everything in between, then all that technology they have and the use to find distances and whatever else, could just be what it's been absorbed by that nice holographic image and sent back, since it's full artificial intelligence, as also all those images that they come from those things they have sent some decades now, can only be hacked and what is sent back is just what must be sent back, why do you believe no thing that goes to space has astronauts inside?, because it can't, otherwise they would have done it already.

Prove that's wrong if you can, you can't and don't use a telescope to do it, it's like saying you seen something that you can't prove that exists.
Prove in real that anything exists of what you have been taught this generation and all previous generations, about space.

You can't.

Really you can't.

Here you go just to the most tall mountain of the World and you need oxygen to survive, don't you think it's a little strange?

prove the wrong, you can?

nope, you can't.

But you can come and call names if you like, if you are someone special you might even call names and everybody to come and agree and thank you, for doing that.

but the fact remains the same, what can you prove, except of fancy pictures and a car that someone sent to space and it's shiny and nice and everything seems so fake that it's real.

oh wait, you'll say that the thing that they have sent at the past and seen all those things, could not have astronauts inside cause they would die on the spaceship...oh well, that's their job, to die on the space, that's why they are called astronauts, so forget that excuse, they didn't and won't send anyone to space, cause they can't, cause if they do, they will have to admit to lot generations what is going on.

Prove wrong for the above if you can.

you can't.

Actually, they would send nothing if they gone far more...

cause they would be dead.

Prove wrong if you can.

You can't.

If anyone decides to answer to any of the above, consider only one fact that is real.

Have read nothing, searched nothing. If you respond, will see the response and it will be either true or false, try it and see how easy it is, no need to search anything.

the funny part is that someone at the very past, said whilst they were trying to built the thing to go to the moon, they realized they had to do something about radiation or so?, and they sent their people to buy from stores all around all the aluminum foils...and they wrapped everything with that...ok, how stupid is that, don't you realize it?

I have noted that prior to a Preplanned calamity, the head of the program usually resigns or is reassigned. This includes shipping, airlines, in war and peace.

[link to www.ctvnews.ca (secure)]

It won't launch at the day they said it will, this is logical.

It's going to be amazing and go off without any problems.

I can't wait to watch.

You'll need to buy more popcorn, it'll take some time.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Hey
@torybruno, who's the jokester?



Where they pump out lots of steam for the rocket experience.

NASA hopes to have a new leader for the agency’s human spaceflight directorate by the end of the year to replace Bill Gerstenmaier, who held the post for nearly 14 years before his reassignment in July amid the Trump administration’s push to land humans on the moon by 2024, a NASA official said .

Until then, NASA will will not commit to a new target launch date for the first flight of the agency’s new heavy-lift rocket, named the Space Launch System, according to Ken Bowersox, who became the acting associate administrator for NASA’s human exploration and operations mission directorate after Gerstenmaier’s ouster in July.


The agency’s witness at the hearing, Ken Bowersox, the acting associate administrator for human exploration and operations, contributed to that skepticism. “How confident are you that we’ll have boots on the moon by 2024?” Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) asked him during the hearing.

“How confident? I wouldn’t bet my oldest child’s upcoming birthday present or anything like that,” Bowersox responded. “We’re working towards it as hard as we can.”


Douglas Loverro, the head of human spaceflight for NASA, abruptly resigned on Monday, after six months on the job and days before the agency is scheduled to launch astronauts for the first time since the space shuttle retired in 2011


Doug Loverro Resigns, Ken Bowersox to be Acting Human Exploration Lead.

__________

So, Ken Bowersox is in the lead, James Bridenstine is the one that is chief in nasa now.

Ken Bowersox, which had replied on, “How confident are you that we’ll have boots on the moon by 2024?” Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) asked him during the hearing, “How confident? I wouldn’t bet my oldest child’s upcoming birthday present or anything like that,” Bowersox responded. “We’re working towards it as hard as we can.”

Keywords are 2024, now we have 2020

also Ken Bowersox was for a while only and then Doug Loverro was put, then Doug Loverro reigned and Ken Bowersox was put again, which he wouldn't promise a present of that kind to his child.

So...conclusion is?

Forget it, it won't launch.

Thread: NASA chief resigns just before 1st astronaut launch in years...

The links are there, 78934093, id put them, the same as now.

I hope they name it Karen.

Orbital human space that capability?

international space station isn't orbiting ?

it has astronauts from US as well, or no?

they are launching only for orbiting?, Elon was more cool, he sent a car, why didn't he put them in that car to restore orbital human space that capability?

Aren't humans those in the International space station?

It is all propaganda. ALL of it.

Had Trump appointed Dr. Astro to head NASA, Trump would be playing golf on the Moon already.

:trump-HRYK

Joking aside, Astro would do that.

wow, seen it, why don't they launch it with a raccoon then ?

why all this effects that are dangerous as well?

Whole video..
10 ish min in. So. painful.

Propaganda.

We need to feel the ground vibrate and see the steam and feel the drama!

It is all for show.

Interesting times we live in.



[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

USAF weather forecast says 40% chances for launch and worse for the spot where the rocket stage is supposed to land.

what if it blows up? (probably won't, all the Nazi rocket scientists America brought over have died off by now)