As 5G hits the market, Military funded research developed radio-frequency switch more than 50 times more energy efficient than today.

What are you going to to 5G peeps, are you guys going to invaded the military?

We won't have to. They'll start dropping dead on their own in a few years.

#Suicide

Millimeter Waves are high intensity.

This study was done with 'low intensity' waves.

It's amusing you morons think this is a joke:

[link to ecfsapi.fcc.gov (secure)]

"This review aims to cover experimental data on oxidative effects of low-intensity radio-frequency radiation (RFR) in living cells. Analysis of the currently available peer-reviewedscientific literature reveals molecular effects induced by low-intensity RFR in living cells; this includes significant activation of key pathways generating reactive oxygen species (ROS),activation of peroxidation, oxidative damage of DNA and changes in the activity of antioxidantenzymes. It indicates that among 100 currently available peer-reviewed studies dealing withoxidative effects of low-intensity RFR, in general, 93 confirmed that RFR induces oxidative effects in biological systems. A wide pathogenic potential of the induced ROS and theirinvolvement in cell signaling pathways explains a range of biological/health effects of low-intensity RFR, which include both cancer and non-cancer pathologies. In conclusion, our analysis demonstrates that low-intensity RFR is an expressive oxidative agent for living cellswith a high pathogenic potential and that the oxidative stress induced by RFR exposure shouldbe recognized as one of the primary mechanisms of the biological activity of this kind ofradiation."

or..


"Abstract

Although an electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is reported in numerous studies, some authors associate hyperfrequencies (HF)-related pains with a nocebo effect while others suggest a biological effect. Therefore, we aimed to suggest hypotheses about the complex mechanisms of headaches related to HF-exposure. We crossed basic features of headaches with relevant studies (from the year 2000 up to 2018) emphasizing on the HF effects that may lead to pain genesis: neuroglial dysmetabolism, neuroinflammation, changes in cerebral blood perfusion, blood-brain barrier dysfunction and electrophysiological evidences of hyperexcitability. We privileged studies implying a sham exposure (for in vivo studies) and a specific absorption rate lower than 4 W/Kg. HF-induced headaches may involve an indirect inflammatory process (neurogenic, magnetogenic or thermogenic) as well as a direct biophysical effect (thermogenic or magnetogenic). We linked inflammatory processes to meningeal dysperfusion or primary neuroglial dysfunction triggered by non-thermal irradiation or HF-induced heating at thermal powers. In the latter case, HF-induced excitoxicity and oxidative stress probably play a crucial role. Such disorders may lead to vascular-trigeminal activation in predisposed people. Interestingly, an abnormal oxidative stress predisposition had been demonstrated in overall 80% of EHS self-reporting patients. In the case of direct effects, pain pathways' activation may be directly triggered by HF-irradiation (heating and/or transcranial HF-induced ectopic action potentials). Further research on HF-related headaches is needed."

[link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

802.11ad was on the market in 2010.
Your new threat has been in active use for a decade in schools, hospitals, government buildings and pretty much anyplace that enjoys high bandwidth.
I installed them, microwave site to site transmitters too.

The real problem is YOUR ignorance of all things scientific.

Oh look a high efficiency switch, must mean more danger right?

Higher efficiency means lower power by the way, and less danger than there wasn't already.

The ones being set up publicly are a 5 inch by 1mm antenna printed on a circuit board that physically cannot handle more tan 12v at a few amps. Not enough to warm water. They cannot be used in a group as a weapon, not maybe, completely impossible.

Its literally the dumbest topic on this forum, even dumber than flat earth, and thats pretty dumb.

bump

More amusing you think it's a valid topic

It is a valid topic...look at the nursing homes scandal in Canada now....that racket will now be federally controlled no more private nursing homes......as we move the dial to 11 and smother the elderly....

Changing the subject won't help you.
You topic is bunk. Prove me wrong.
Prove it hasn't been in widespread use since 2010.
Prove any of your claims.
I challenge you to kill something with one, even a bug.

My cat used to sleep on my WiGig router because it was warm. 60ghz, no dead cat.

Prove 5G has been 'in widespread use' since 2010?

Nice strawman.

And yes, more people are sick then ever today, and more studies than ever have come out showing the toxicity of 'wireless' carriers.

It's not safe, it never was, and every fraudulent 'upgrade' made by the telecom industry only makes people more sick.


-----------

Abstract
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), known in the past as “Microwave syndrome”, is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of a wide spectrum of non-specific multiple organ symptoms, typically including central nervous system symptoms, that occur following the patient's acute or chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields in the environment or in occupational settings.

Numerous studies have shown biological effects at the cellular level of electromagnetic fields (EMF) at magnetic (ELF) and radio-frequency (RF) frequencies in extremely low intensities. Many of the mechanisms described for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) apply with modification to EHS. Repeated exposures result in sensitization and consequent enhancement of response. Many hypersensitive patients appear to have impaired detoxification systems that become overloaded by excessive oxidative stress. EMF can induce changes in calcium signaling cascades, significant activation of free radical processes and overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells as well as altered neurological and cognitive functions and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Magnetite crystals absorbed from combustion air pollution could have an important role in brain effects of EMF. Autonomic nervous system effects of EMF could also be expressed as symptoms in the cardiovascular system. Other common effects of EMF include effects on skin, microvasculature, immune and hematologic systems.

It is concluded that the mechanisms underlying the symptoms of EHS are biologically plausible and that many organic physiologic responses occur following EMF exposure. Patients can have neurologic, neuro-hormonal and neuro-psychiatric symptoms following exposure to EMF as a consequence of neural damage and over-sensitized neural responses.

More relevant diagnostic tests for EHS should be developed. Exposure limits should be lowered to safeguard against biologic effects of EMF. Spread of local and global wireless networks should be decreased, and safer wired networks should be used instead of wireless, to protect susceptible members of the public. Public places should be made accessible for electrohypersensitive individuals.

[link to doi.org (secure)]


You keep ignoring the very real studies proving it though you fucking $3.50 shill

Symptoms Experienced by Persons with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Submissions to FCC Docket #13-84

"This report summarizes the responses of 184 persons with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) who submitted comments to the FCC (Docket #13-84) and reported either their symptoms or the sources of their problematic exposure to radio frequency radiation."

[link to www.saferemr.com (secure)]


Abstract
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), known in the past as “Microwave syndrome”, is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of a wide spectrum of non-specific multiple organ symptoms, typically including central nervous system symptoms, that occur following the patient's acute or chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields in the environment or in occupational settings.

Abstract:

"Numerous studies have shown biological effects at the cellular level of electromagnetic fields (EMF) at magnetic (ELF) and radio-frequency (RF) frequencies in extremely low intensities. Many of the mechanisms described for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) apply with modification to EHS. Repeated exposures result in sensitization and consequent enhancement of response. Many hypersensitive patients appear to have impaired detoxification systems that become overloaded by excessive oxidative stress. EMF can induce changes in calcium signaling cascades, significant activation of free radical processes and overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells as well as altered neurological and cognitive functions and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Magnetite crystals absorbed from combustion air pollution could have an important role in brain effects of EMF. Autonomic nervous system effects of EMF could also be expressed as symptoms in the cardiovascular system. Other common effects of EMF include effects on skin, microvasculature, immune and hematologic systems."

[link to doi.org (secure)]

Abstract

Since 2009, we built up a database which presently includes more than 2000 electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and/or multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) self-reported cases. This database shows that EHS is associated in 30% of the cases with MCS, and that MCS precedes the occurrence of EHS in 37% of these EHS/MCS-associated cases. EHS and MCS can be characterized clinically by a similar symptomatic picture, and biologically by low-grade inflammation and an autoimmune response involving autoantibodies against O-myelin. Moreover, 80% of the patients with EHS present with one, two, or three detectable oxidative stress biomarkers in their peripheral blood, meaning that overall these patients present with a true objective somatic disorder. Moreover, by using ultrasonic cerebral tomosphygmography and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, we showed that cases have a defect in the middle cerebral artery hemodynamics, and we localized a tissue pulsometric index deficiency in the capsulo-thalamic area of the temporal lobes, suggesting the involvement of the limbic system and the thalamus. Altogether, these data strongly suggest that EHS is a neurologic pathological disorder which can be diagnosed, treated, and prevented. Because EHS is becoming a new insidious worldwide plague involving millions of people, we ask the World Health Organization (WHO) to include EHS as a neurologic disorder in the international classification of diseases.



[link to www.mdpi.com (secure)]

you are right, I am ignoring all the studies, because they are bullshit.
I have the benefit of having worked with this technology for a long time, so I know its bullshit.
As does every other network guy that has been working since 2000.
Electrohypersensitivity is a lie, mental illness.

Its as bad as people that say they are allergic to MSG, fuckin retards, its in all living things.

They always put on a good show faking their symptoms. Setting them up is even funnier. If they think there is Wi-Fi, they act. If they believe none is around, they are fine.

I would love to expose them personally by putting a router under their desk for a week and then tell them, just to watch the show.

You claim studies prove things, then each and every study gets debunked. Not one stands up to scrutiny, none.

Since 2010, not one of you morons has been able to prove anything.

Live in fear if you want. But just fuck off to do it and leave the world alone.
Live I fear of the virus too.
Move to the sticks and dont come back, best solution to the problem of complete and utter ignorance.

Wow your anecdotal evidence about your cat really convinced me.

r U a sCiEnTiSt? ???

I love how the shills keep moving the goalposts.

First, it's no studies exist proving EMF wireless causes health problems.


Studies are presented.

"WeLl dOoZe R bUlLShIt cAuSe tHeY dOnT sAY wHaT I dOO HuuRRR dUrRRRR"

I dont have to be a scientist.
Scientists already created the technology, I just use it, install it and point and laugh at the idiots afraid of it and think its new and dangerous.

Its literally a case of if you never heard about it, you would never ever know. Because there is no danger Ahab, go find a new whale.

Developed around 2005, announced in 2009, in active use starting 2010. In schools, in hospitals, clinics, office buildings and pretty much anywhere high performance wireless was wanted.

It IS the WiGig standard.
Its no different.
It physically cannot put out enough power to hurt anything and cannot be configured to do so. NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE.
NONLETHAL military crowd control devices are compact focused areas built completely differently! Oh and did I mention NONLETHAL!?

Seriously go read up.
Learn how much power can go through wires of different guages.
Learn about frequency and the century of data associated.
Learn about how an antenna works and how electricity works with that in regards to power levels and what is required to cause physical damage.
Learn about microwave technology and safe usage.

You are the ignorant one, not me.
Go be a good little sheep and spread your fear.

Except I've just presented about 5 studies that quote 500 other studies proving you're full of shit.

In fact, even EMF exposure BELOW the international 'standard' guidelines have caused extensive documented damage.

You really need to work harder for your $3.50.

You're right about one thing though, you're not a scientist, you're not even very smart. You sound like an overweight Carl that can barely keep his pants over his sagging gut. You're probably unhealthy from working around so much electrical toxicity all of your life.

Tell me more about your cat, is it autistic with brain tumors like you?



------------------

Abstract

A growing number of countries are beginning to acknowledge that electrohypersensitivity (EHS) exists and a few countries have classified it as a disability or a functional impairment attributable to the environment. Epidemiological studies and in vivo experiments show that exposure to non-ionizing radiation (NIR) from extremely low to microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) at exposure intensities far below the maximum limits in international guidelines increases anxiety, depression, and physiological stress and impairs cognitive functions that include concentration, memory and learning.

Furthermore, exposure to NIR contributes to neurodegenerative diseases including dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.

Exposure of the fetus to NIR (mobile phone) affects the neonatal heart and can lead to emotional and behavioral problems in human offspring. Similar exposures in laboratory studies report impaired cognitive performance, neuronal losses and pathological changes in the brain of rat offspring. The scientific and medical communities have repeatedly sent out urgent warnings, in the form of appeals, declarations and testimonies, that exposure to NIR needs to be reduced from a public health perspective.

[link to www.e-discoverypublication.com]

tHe hEalTh sTuDiEs arNeT rEaL I kNoW cAuSe I tOoK a cOmMuNitY coLeGe cLaSs oN wIrLeSs I wOrK oN duH pHoNeS HuRRR dUrrr


--------------------

Abstract

Human exposure to man-made Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) has increased to unprecedented levels, accompanied by increase in various health problems. A connection has been indicated by an increasing number of studies. Symptoms characterized as Electro-hyper-sensitivity (EHS) are frequently reported especially in urban environments. Lately, people are advised by private companies and individuals to protect themselves from man-made EMFs by metal shielding through various products, for which there are reasonable concerns about their protective efficacy and safety. Indeed, any metal shielding practice, even when correctly applied, attenuates not only man-made totally polarized EMFs accused for the health problems, but also the natural non-polarized EMFs responsible for the biological rhythmicity and well-being of all animals. Strong evidence on this was provided by pioneering experiments in the 1960's and 1970's, with volunteers staying in a shielded underground apartment. We analyze the physical principles of EMF-shielding, the importance of natural atmospheric EMFs, and examine available shielding methods and suggested products, relying on science-based evidence. We suggest that an avoidance strategy is safer than shielding, and provide specific protection tips. We do not reject shielding in general, but describe ways to keep it at a minimum by intermittent use, as this is theoretically safer than extensive permanent shielding. We explain why metallic patches or "chips" or minerals claimed by sellers to be protective, do not seem to make sense and might even be risky. We finally suggest urgent research on the safety and efficacy of shielding methods combined with use of generators emitting weak pulses of similar frequency, intensity, and waveform with the natural atmospheric resonances.


[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]


--------------------

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Everyday exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) emitted from wireless devices such as mobile phones and base stations, radio and television transmitters is ubiquitous. Some people attribute non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) such as headache and fatigue to exposure to RF-EMF. Most previous laboratory studies or studies that analyzed populations at a group level did not find evidence of an association between RF-EMF exposure and NSPS.

OBJECTIVES: We explored the association between exposure to RF-EMF in daily life and the occurrence of NSPS in individual self-declared electrohypersensitive persons using body worn exposimeters and electronic diaries.

METHODS: We selected seven individuals who attributed their NSPS to RF-EMF exposure. The level of and variability in personal RF-EMF exposure and NSPS were determined during a three-week period. Data were analyzed using time series analysis in which exposure as measured and recorded in the diary was correlated with NSPS.

RESULTS: We found statistically significant correlations between perceived and actual exposure to wireless internet (WiFi - rate of change and number of peaks above threshold) and base stations for mobile telecommunications (GSM + UMTS downlink, rate of change) and NSPS scores in four of the seven participants. In two persons a higher EMF exposure was associated with higher symptom scores, and in two other persons it was associated with lower scores. Remarkably, we found no significant correlations between NSPS and time-weighted average power density, the most commonly used exposure metric.


[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

Except it being out in the world and causing no problems, must be a good study.

So the entire telecom and network community should all be full of tumors or dead by now?
People who work around it at the highest concentration should all be sick should they not?

If one word of your shit was true, not one telecom or network worker could survive. There would be massive waves of cancer and tumors in the community.

There is not.
Study that and get back to us.
Common sense vs irrational fear and studies paid for by wackadoo groups.

802.11ad go read.

Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

A decade in, hasn't been a problem yet, next.

Yea, except studies prove you're full of shit. Sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling 'lalalallalaalall' isn't a good look moron.

Like I said, you probably already have autism, brain tumors and a low sperm count. A few more years the free radicals produced by the oxidative stress that is proven to occur from long term exposure will catch up to you.

You're as stupid as the idiots that eat McDonalds 3x a day and think nothing is going to happen in the future.

Lol, this guys retort to studies that prove he's full of shit is literally: 'lalalallalaaalalalalaal'.

Yes, there ARE adverse affects, you ignoring them doesn't make it not so.

FFS you seriously are braindead. Go suck a transmitting lightbulb. You probably have your dumb-house wired up with them too.

Is Canada cuck going to deny that headaches are caused by excessive Cell Phone usage?

Abstract

Headache is increasingly being reported as a detrimental effect of mobile phone (MP) use. However, studies aimed to investigate the association between MP use and headache yielded conflicting results. To assess the consistency of the data on the topic, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available cross-sectional studies. Published literature from PubMed and other databases were retrieved and screened, and 7 cross-sectional studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. We found that the risk of headache was increased by 38% in MP user compared with non-MP user (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18-1.61, p&#8201;<&#8201;0.001). Among MP users, the risk of headache was also increased in those who had longer daily call duration (2-15&#8201;min vs. <2&#8201;min: OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.34-1.98, p&#8201;<&#8201;0.001; >15&#8201;min vs. <2&#8201;min: OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.76-3.54, p&#8201;<&#8201;0.001) and higher daily call frequency (2-4 calls vs. <2 calls: OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76, p&#8201;<&#8201;0.001; >4 calls vs. <2 calls: OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.78-3.58, p&#8201;<&#8201;0.001). Our data indicate that MP use is significantly associated with headache, further epidemiologic and experimental studies are required to affirm and understand this association.



[link to www.nature.com (secure)]