Flynn Case Ordered Dismissed! Appeals Court Rules

Wasn't me that posted. Tried to help you.

Wish it were so but the democrats/communist have more rioting,burning and killing to do.....

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Oops sorry. Thank you but a pet peeve of mine is people making posts without links. It helps everyone to include links otherwise it's just an opinion...

Well if it's that easy then take the time to link the info to inform everyone that what you're saying is true.

The DS tried to frame this American Patriot and runied him financially in the process. I would sue everyone who was involved. I hope the DS is scared. I really do.

If you follow the news, or have ever taken a civics course, you've seen this happen many times before. Don't be lazy, doing a little research and learning new things won't hurt you.

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

Is James Comey and his band of Dirty Cops going to apologize to General Michael Flynn (and many others) for what they have done to ruin his life? What about Robert Mueller and his Angry Democrat Cronies - Are they going to say, SO SORRY? And what about Obama & Biden?

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Judge Rao said this: “If evidence comes to light calling into question the integrity or purpose of an underlying criminal investigation, the Executive Branch must have the authority to decide that further prosecution is not in the interest of justice,”

I’m speculating but since she put it on record, I’m guessing it could be difficult for Sullivan to maneuver through this without backfiring?

I agree do your research. You might learn something.

Published Sep. 2017:
"The D.C. Circuit did a noteworthy yet routine thing this week — it denied rehearing en banc in Wrenn v. District of Columbia, the Court’s recent Second Amendment case."

"Because the D.C. Circuit regularly denies rehearing en banc."

"It seems that the D.C. Circuit has concluded that rehearing en banc should be rare. It is not enough for a judge to think that the panel got it wrong — something more is required."

[link to www.yalejreg.com (secure)]

But then again, it’s coming out either way so he may take the shot for new panel of corrupt judges. But if they go against him, his career/legacy is fucked.
He’s really got to think this through since Henderson was the deciding Judge on this ruling and everyone thought she’d rule in favor of Sullivan.

I mean c’mon...new evidence shows Comey admitting there was nothing wrong with Flynn convo then Labotomy Biden pushed Logan Act.
Good luck with that Sullivan

You can't dismiss a case after a conviction.

No legal precedent.

Hard to tell what is going on.


A conviction can be overturned by an appeals court after a trial, but not dismissed

Good find. Are they going to submit the newly found Strzok notes saying Comey confirming nothing wrong with Flynn conversation? lol

Flynn was the go between for Putin and Trump

There is no doubt in my mind he conspired to commit treason.

And there is equally no doubt in my mind Trump is doing just what Putin knew he would, destroying this country.

An appellate court might dismiss a case after it has reversed the conviction on the grounds of a bad search or arrest. After the appellate court rules that a search or arrest was improper, the court usually also will order that evidence resulting from the search or arrest cannot be introduced at trial.

All that has happened is it was determined Flynn can have an appeal trial. No one can just "let him off"

Thats not how it works.

No sir, if the appeals court disqualifies evidence a new trial must be conducted , UNLESS the PROSECUTOR motions for dismissal. No judge can unilaterally "dismiss" a case

Sad

Why did Brennan hide the fact that Russia wanted Hillary to win?
Hillary was compromised and they could use as leverage.
Trump scared them.
Russia sewed chaos. Nothing new but that crazy back channel is BS.
Just ask Corney

[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

Comey: The Flynn/Kislyak calls "appear legit."

Nope.

DC Circuit orders Judge Sullivan to grant the DOJ Motion to Dismiss.

They also "vacate the district court's order appointing an amicus as moot."

Full doc:
[link to scribd.com (secure)]

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Yes you can if it is proven the case was built on falsehoods and denial of Flynn's constitutional rights. Sydney Powell explains:

Published Feb. 14, 2020:


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

.
...... X 100000! ...
.

The question should be, is President Trump's DOJ finally going to indict and arrest those involved?

No....I don’t know where you’re getting this BS. The DC Circuit just ordered Judge Sullivan to grant the DOJ Motion to Dismiss.

Discussing it here. Dragging holder into it. Haha!! This is a great day!!

House Judiciary Hearing on Justice Department Oversight
[link to www.c-span.org (secure)]

Link?

Flynn can now sue the MSM, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strzok, Page, Priestap, Baker, Kerry, Clinton, Biden, and Obama for millions.

Since it was an illegally planned action to violate Flynn’s constitutional rights, all of those involved lose their qualified immunity.

This is the pin pulled from the grenade that will bring down the corrupted democrat house of cards.

That's an awful bad habit you are getting into. Don't rely on others for links to info.