| Users Online Now: 1,968 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 825,293 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,113,774 | Threads Today: 301 | Posts Today: 4,765 |
| 09:31 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,968 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 825,293 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,113,774 | Threads Today: 301 | Posts Today: 4,765 |
| 09:31 AM | ||
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh joined a butchery of the Constitution. | |
| Anon Cow User ID: 76947365  United States07/07/2020 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anon Cow 76947365 Notice how they keep changing the subject to steer the conversation away from the premise of the thread which is the actual 9-0 ruling  you can claim what you think the ruling means. it means one thing. the constitution was upheld and electoral colleges cant sell their votes to COMMIEZ. good night and bad luck comrade. I can’t tell if you’re trolling Or if you’re just fucking retarded You mean the same SUPREME COURT that has declined to hear ten 2nd Amendment cases now, which has handed DEMOCRATS 10 uncontested wins at the appellate level? Then explain the popular vote Trump lost the election They don't care about facts. Their Orwellian mindset is that it's all...   |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75449616 United States07/07/2020 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78272640 One of the most important rules of logic is that the source has no relevance to whether something is true or not. Is this too intellectual for GLP these days?  A genetic fallacy occurs when a claim is accepted as true or false based on the origin of the claim. So, instead of looking at the actual merits of the claim, it is judged based on its origin. [link to www.softschools.com (secure)] Notice how they keep changing the subject to steer the conversation away from the premise of the thread which is the actual 9-0 ruling you can claim what you think the ruling means. it means one thing. the constitution was upheld and electoral colleges cant sell their votes to COMMIEZ. good night and bad luck comrade. I can’t tell if you’re trolling Or if you’re just tucking retarded You mean the same SUPREME COURT that has declined to hear ten 2nd Amendment cases now, which has handed DEMOCRATS 10 uncontested wins at the appellate level? Then explain the popular vote Trump lost the election wow. you commies cant accept that your coup is over. im really sorry you spent so much money and its all for nothing. actually im not. hahahahahahahahahahaha. AMERICA IS THE FIRST NATION EVER TO COUNTER A BOLSHEVIC MARXIST REVOLUTION AND WIN. HITLER WENT WAY TO FAR. AMERICA USED RULE OF LAW AND SILENCE TO DEFEAT THE NASTY SHIT STAINED BOLSHEVICS. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75449616 United States07/07/2020 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75449616 you can claim what you think the ruling means. it means one thing. the constitution was upheld and electoral colleges cant sell their votes to COMMIEZ. good night and bad luck comrade. I can’t tell if you’re trolling Or if you’re just fucking retarded You mean the same SUPREME COURT that has declined to hear ten 2nd Amendment cases now, which has handed DEMOCRATS 10 uncontested wins at the appellate level? Then explain the popular vote Trump lost the election They don't care about facts. Their Orwellian mindset is that it's all... I SEE YOUR BUSY TALKING TO YOURSELF? COMMIES....\ SO GHEYYY |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17722066 United States07/07/2020 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78272640 One of the most important rules of logic is that the source has no relevance to whether something is true or not. Is this too intellectual for GLP these days? A genetic fallacy occurs when a claim is accepted as true or false based on the origin of the claim. So, instead of looking at the actual merits of the claim, it is judged based on its origin. [link to www.softschools.com (secure)] Notice how they keep changing the subject to steer the conversation away from the premise of the thread which is the actual 9-0 ruling you can claim what you think the ruling means. it means one thing. the constitution was upheld and electoral colleges cant sell their votes to COMMIEZ. good night and bad luck comrade. I can’t tell if you’re trolling Or if you’re just tucking retarded You mean the same SUPREME COURT that has declined to hear ten 2nd Amendment cases now, which has handed DEMOCRATS 10 uncontested wins at the appellate level? Then explain the popular vote Trump lost the election I'm no big fan of RINOs. That being said, read the whole ruling. /TLDR/ State electors MUST vote as the state vote dictates or face sanctions and replacement. This actually kneecaps national popular vote movements in that it keeps the elector assignment at the state level, per the Constitution. |
Trained Noticer
Forum Moderator  User ID: 76014573 United States07/07/2020 11:58 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73120679 United States07/07/2020 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75449616 READING COMPREHENSION ISNT YOUR STRONG SUIT. YOUR FUCKERY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROVES NOTHING. EAT SHIT COMMIE. Pay attention GLP Notice how OP is attacked and accused of being the enemy With no evidence No one going to pay attention to an anonymous coward Yeah that’s why my last 4 threads disappeared Do you even understand the implications for this ruling as it applies to the election or are you claiming yet another win that never happened? Please keep treating us like the enemy though It doesn't say anything about that. |
| dbcooper
User ID: 70282616  Canada07/07/2020 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Enjoy being on the losing side of history again clowns. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75449616 United States07/07/2020 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trumptards cant even read a simple op, we get it inbreeding makes it hard for your pea briain to function normaly, and anything that does not say trump is da best makes you feel insecure and makes you cry like the beta males you trully are. Quoting: dbcooper Enjoy being on the losing side of history again clowns. take your temper tantrum to the safe room sissy pants. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79022061 United States07/07/2020 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This actually kneecaps national popular vote movements in that it keeps the elector assignment at the state level, per the Constitution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17722066 Absolutely NOT! It's just the opposite: Which brings us back to this week’s Supreme Court ruling, which paves the way for us to effectively abolish the Electoral College without needing a constitutional amendment. After all, the same constitutional principles that allow a state to bind its electors to the winner of the statewide popular vote should allow it to bind its electors to the winner of the nationwide popular vote. This means that if states that combine to hold a majority of electoral votes all agree to support the popular-vote winner, they can do an end-run around the Electoral College. America would still have its clumsy two-step process for presidential elections. But the people’s choice and the electors’ choice would be guaranteed to match up every time. Many states are already on board with an agreement, called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which would do exactly that. The beauty of the compact is that it only goes into effect when it would bind a majority of electors to support the winner national popular vote – and today, it’s just 74 electoral votes away from that threshold. Getting the remaining states to sign on won’t be easy, but it will be far easier than amending the Constitution. And it would ensure that the American President is the person the American people choose. Democrats might not be better off in the long run. Republicans might not be better off in the long run. But ultimately, our republic would be better off in the long run—and the Court’s ruling today clears up many of the potential constitutional hurdles the compact might face. [link to time.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75449616 United States07/07/2020 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This actually kneecaps national popular vote movements in that it keeps the elector assignment at the state level, per the Constitution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17722066 Absolutely NOT! It's just the opposite: Which brings us back to this week’s Supreme Court ruling, which paves the way for us to effectively abolish the Electoral College without needing a constitutional amendment. After all, the same constitutional principles that allow a state to bind its electors to the winner of the statewide popular vote should allow it to bind its electors to the winner of the nationwide popular vote. This means that if states that combine to hold a majority of electoral votes all agree to support the popular-vote winner, they can do an end-run around the Electoral College. America would still have its clumsy two-step process for presidential elections. But the people’s choice and the electors’ choice would be guaranteed to match up every time. Many states are already on board with an agreement, called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which would do exactly that. The beauty of the compact is that it only goes into effect when it would bind a majority of electors to support the winner national popular vote – and today, it’s just 74 electoral votes away from that threshold. Getting the remaining states to sign on won’t be easy, but it will be far easier than amending the Constitution. And it would ensure that the American President is the person the American people choose. Democrats might not be better off in the long run. Republicans might not be better off in the long run. But ultimately, our republic would be better off in the long run—and the Court’s ruling today clears up many of the potential constitutional hurdles the compact might face. [link to time.com (secure)] give it up man. you have the IQ of a chimp. or you think you can lie to fool people like a shifty lawyer. god you commies are dumb. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 17415020 United States07/07/2020 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Hub Cap Halo
User ID: 28408601 United States07/07/2020 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79022061 United States07/07/2020 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or they're just doing their duty... Jesuit Rule of the Supreme Court of the United States of America [link to vaticanassassins.org (secure)] The article linked above was written long before Gorsuch and Kavanaugh (who both have Jesuit educations) were confirmed to the Supreme Court. Why did Kavanaugh mention the Jesuit high school he attended during his speech accepting his nomination to the Supreme Court? (Start at 11:13) Kavanaugh: “The motto of my Jesuit high school was, 'Men for others,'” he said. “I have tried to live that creed.” Why would a man who's being nominated for one of the most important jobs in the world be talking about the motto of his high school during a speech like this? I can't remember the motto of my high school. Can you? This was a message to the world about who Kavanaugh represents in my opinion. He lives by a Jesuit creed according to himself. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
| Anon Cow User ID: 76706899 United States07/07/2020 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This actually kneecaps national popular vote movements in that it keeps the elector assignment at the state level, per the Constitution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17722066 Absolutely NOT! It's just the opposite: Which brings us back to this week’s Supreme Court ruling, which paves the way for us to effectively abolish the Electoral College without needing a constitutional amendment. After all, the same constitutional principles that allow a state to bind its electors to the winner of the statewide popular vote should allow it to bind its electors to the winner of the nationwide popular vote. This means that if states that combine to hold a majority of electoral votes all agree to support the popular-vote winner, they can do an end-run around the Electoral College. America would still have its clumsy two-step process for presidential elections. But the people’s choice and the electors’ choice would be guaranteed to match up every time. Many states are already on board with an agreement, called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which would do exactly that. The beauty of the compact is that it only goes into effect when it would bind a majority of electors to support the winner national popular vote – and today, it’s just 74 electoral votes away from that threshold. Getting the remaining states to sign on won’t be easy, but it will be far easier than amending the Constitution. And it would ensure that the American President is the person the American people choose. Democrats might not be better off in the long run. Republicans might not be better off in the long run. But ultimately, our republic would be better off in the long run—and the Court’s ruling today clears up many of the potential constitutional hurdles the compact might face. [link to time.com (secure)] give it up man. you have the IQ of a chimp. or you think you can lie to fool people like a shifty lawyer. god you commies are dumb. Take notes GLP Irrefutable proof of the existence of a DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN here to claim wins that never happened Keep swallowing |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76706899 United States07/07/2020 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anon Cow 76947365 Notice how they keep changing the subject to steer the conversation away from the premise of the thread which is the actual 9-0 ruling you can claim what you think the ruling means. it means one thing. the constitution was upheld and electoral colleges cant sell their votes to COMMIEZ. good night and bad luck comrade. I can’t tell if you’re trolling Or if you’re just tucking retarded You mean the same SUPREME COURT that has declined to hear ten 2nd Amendment cases now, which has handed DEMOCRATS 10 uncontested wins at the appellate level? Then explain the popular vote Trump lost the election I'm no big fan of RINOs. That being said, read the whole ruling. /TLDR/ State electors MUST vote as the state vote dictates or face sanctions and replacement. This actually kneecaps national popular vote movements in that it keeps the elector assignment at the state level, per the Constitution.  |
| 3643297
User ID: 76832232 United States07/07/2020 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
