Trump defends armed St Louis couple

Just remember, only police officers can legally use ignorance of the law as an excuse. They will put you in a cage for it, even if you are righteously defending your property while ignorant.

You don't ever point a firearm at anyone unless you plan to shoot them.

Aftermath:

So, a mob broke down an iron gate, beat you to within an inch of your life, killed your wife and your dog, then burned your house to the ground?

That’s correct.

Don’t you own a gun?

Yes, I do.

Why didn’t you stop them?

I didn’t want to get in trouble for BRANDISHING.

Probably not popular with the tards around here but this was what I was taught growing up.

From the Legal Dictionary


Breaking and Entering
n. 1) the criminal act of entering a residence or other enclosed property through the slightest amount of force (even pushing open a door), without authorization.

The "protesters" broke down the gate to get into the property, they were actually fully within their rights to mow the mob down, let alone point their weapons at them.

He's wrong. As usual. On private property under threat it's absolute legal.

He's always wrong.

Says the 3.50 shill

The way it was told to me by the sheriff is that there ARE cases where castle doctrine can extend outside the four walls of your home but to be safe you have to let them cross the threshold of your house. That's where stand your ground comes in, you have the right to self defense wherever you are, moreso on your own property.

I believe if it's fenced off private property and they violate the no trespassing sign castle doctrine applies but I'm not 100% on that.

This nonsense arguing that it was assault with a deadly weapon is exactly that, nonsense. The protestors had a history of violence, destroyed property to gain entrance, then threatened the homeowners. It's not even up for debate.

or they kill you and the story ends on the ultimate sour note

On the news they said it applied to your property.

Bullshit! Show me the law that I cannot point a fire arm at assholes invading my property, threatening to burn down my home and kill me. Get the fuck outa here!

I also like to stand around with my hands in my pockets whistling as the mobs surrounds me as well.

It depends on if the protesters stepped on their property

If they stepped even a foot on the property then the owners had a legal right to point the guns at them

Trump kicks ass!

Bullshit

Those people have the GOD GIVEN RIGHT to protect themselves and their property NO DISCUSSION !

The prosecutor or DA..in St Louis is a far left wing black idiot who has repeatedly shown her tendency's to be soft on black crime and hard on conservatives. The states AG is livid about her processing the couple rather than the mob who torn down a gate to enter the property's.


PROVING AGAIN NOT ONE DEMORAT SHOULD REMAIN IN OFFICE AFTER ELECTIONS..

Michael White murdered Sean Schellenger and used the. "I feared for my life", even though Sean was stabbed in the back. Sean had turned aroung as had White, then White turned and stabbed him, out right murder, but got 0 time in jail because (well because Bronx jury).

At the end of the day, that is the decision we are faced with:
- listen to words written on paper by people who dont care about us
- defend your life and property regardless of the law

But you can't imagine law into existence, or interpret it a way that's counter to its actual wording. It is what it is.
Do what you have to do, and make sure you are willing to deal with the consequences when the law doesn't adequately cover your ass.

Yeah they have that right. The State also has the right to confiscate their firearms afterward during the investigation. What part of the legal process do you not understand?

it was two people on their own property against a crowd that appeared unruly to them. they were fearful for their lives. they did not even have, as a practical matter, enough arms or ammo to defend themselves from that crowd on their person, should that crowd have decided to, I don't know, dismember them.

We're not all fucking tards, and yeah, it's the way most of us with street wise parents, or just came up on the streets, were taught. However, we live in very different times now, things have changed in major ways and normal people who would never even pull a weapon are being forced to defend themselves, their families, their businesses and their homes.

There was a mob not a half mile from my home in the burbs, damn straight I was fully prepared and would've been sitting right out on my porch 12G in hand. Luckily it didn't come to that, but if it did I'm not going to sit in my home and wait for them to destroy my property and throw molotovs in my fucking window.

The rules of engagement have changed

.............and what the narrative doesn't show is that there were at least two protesters that displayed their weapons. Also, in the days before this incident, there were protests right outside this community. I agree that the couple didn't not have good firearms etiquette, but considering that Burn-Loot-Murder had now invaded their neighborhood, you can understand where they were coming from.

It is not their obligation to retreat.

Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are.

You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe.

Angry insane mob breaks down an iron gate to get into private property. They gather in front of someone’s house threatening to kill them, kill their dog and burn their house to the ground.

Homeowners come out, armed, and point their guns at the mob threatening to murder them.

The Mob’s reaction: Scream more threats to murder the homeowners then run to the police claiming the homeowner threatened them by pointing a gun at them.

The homeowners pointed guns at us!!!! That’s threatening! ARREST THEM!!!!

Ahem, didn’t you break down a gate, trespass onto private property and threaten to murder them, their dog and burn their house down?

Well yeah, but they pointed guns at us!!!

Yes and no.

YES you Should have no limits to defense of self on property because once social and community standards are intentionally and violently breached you have no fucking clue what's next or where it stops.


No, because the courts and reinterpretation from preexisting common sense common law which founded the BoR have been INTENTIONALY corrupted so that every fucking thing previously well understood and clear was made conditional so that the courts could access the deep pockets of the productive public to grant ever increasing power to compel and extort the public by an insurgency of constitutional criminals and defectives seeking unearned support and avoiding once commonly accepted consequences for noncompliance with natural law.
That's why the system is named for a tribe of invaders and and not actually for a legitimate objective process and why, who promotes and benefits from it, and who ALWAYS gets fucked out of their privacy, property and liberty are who they are.

THIS IS THE very definition of LAWFARE against the productive public in accordance with the founding law of the Judiciary, Lev 25, 44-46.
You cant win and they can't lose, your laws no longer apply.

Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing

Doubt per diem or per piece, definitely salaried with bennies

They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You bolded your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE.

Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do.