| Users Online Now: 1,610 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 691,384 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,173,881 | Threads Today: 438 | Posts Today: 7,994 |
| 01:17 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,610 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 691,384 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,173,881 | Threads Today: 438 | Posts Today: 7,994 |
| 01:17 PM | ||
Trump defends armed St Louis couple | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72430464  United States07/15/2020 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. Oh really? Then why wasn’t this black DA and her husband arrested and charged? Why wasn’t their home raided and firearms confiscated? From the dailymail: LA's first black DA slams BLM for targeting her after her husband pulled a gun on protesters at their home and says defunding the police would lead to lawlessness The group arranged chairs and prayed on the sidewalk but did not initially approach Lacey's property until Abdullah and two others went to the front door. Then, they said, they heard a gun cock. 'I thought I was being paranoid, and I said, 'That didn't sound good,' Abdullah told the Los Angeles Times. 'And then her husband opened the door and pointed a gun and said. 'Get off my porch.' Lacey apologized for the incident in the immediate aftermath. But in Saturday's CNN interview, she said that the activists had crossed a line. 'I definitely don't think you should be able to come onto someone's property,' she said. 'That crosses a line.' |
Ignatius J
 User ID: 79117186 United States07/15/2020 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The homeowners were wrong in this case. Their first obligation is their duty to retreat which they did not do. They did the exact opposite. The "private" property you are all discussing is not theirs. Quoting: Ignatius J Do a little research on these folks. They are charlatans and you all are now falling for their shtick. And to the rest of you here: Your irrational fear of black and brown folks does not give you the right to intimidate them with firearms. Your lives aren't in danger every time someone of a different race crosses your path. The saddest part is that you are so scared that you automatically "fear for your life". This is also the reason that police shoot unarmed people of color at a inordinate rate. Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are. You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe. Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. "I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78913612 United States07/15/2020 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. Oh really? Then why wasn’t this black DA and her husband arrested and charged? Why wasn’t their home raided and firearms confiscated? From the dailymail: LA's first black DA slams BLM for targeting her after her husband pulled a gun on protesters at their home and says defunding the police would lead to lawlessness The group arranged chairs and prayed on the sidewalk but did not initially approach Lacey's property until Abdullah and two others went to the front door. Then, they said, they heard a gun cock. 'I thought I was being paranoid, and I said, 'That didn't sound good,' Abdullah told the Los Angeles Times. 'And then her husband opened the door and pointed a gun and said. 'Get off my porch.' Lacey apologized for the incident in the immediate aftermath. But in Saturday's CNN interview, she said that the activists had crossed a line. 'I definitely don't think you should be able to come onto someone's property,' she said. 'That crosses a line.' Like I said, times have changed, and so have the rules of engagement. The law doesn't matter anymore, both sides use it to their own advantage to suit their own agenda. Problem is their side is protecting them, our side isn't, so we're taking matters into our own hands. Just so happens that we also support the Blue, and in return we're getting the same. |
| uscrusader1
User ID: 74244510 United States07/15/2020 10:48 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SiniXster the Dread Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are. You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe. Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. No, it's genetic. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7279210 United States07/15/2020 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The homeowners were wrong in this case. Their first obligation is their duty to retreat which they did not do. They did the exact opposite. The "private" property you are all discussing is not theirs. Quoting: Ignatius J Do a little research on these folks. They are charlatans and you all are now falling for their shtick. And to the rest of you here: Your irrational fear of black and brown folks does not give you the right to intimidate them with firearms. Your lives aren't in danger every time someone of a different race crosses your path. The saddest part is that you are so scared that you automatically "fear for your life". This is also the reason that police shoot unarmed people of color at a inordinate rate. Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are. You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe. Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing Obviously a fan of LAWFARE. |
| uscrusader1
User ID: 74244510 United States07/15/2020 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. Oh really? Then why wasn’t this black DA and her husband arrested and charged? Why wasn’t their home raided and firearms confiscated? From the dailymail: LA's first black DA slams BLM for targeting her after her husband pulled a gun on protesters at their home and says defunding the police would lead to lawlessness The group arranged chairs and prayed on the sidewalk but did not initially approach Lacey's property until Abdullah and two others went to the front door. Then, they said, they heard a gun cock. 'I thought I was being paranoid, and I said, 'That didn't sound good,' Abdullah told the Los Angeles Times. 'And then her husband opened the door and pointed a gun and said. 'Get off my porch.' Lacey apologized for the incident in the immediate aftermath. But in Saturday's CNN interview, she said that the activists had crossed a line. 'I definitely don't think you should be able to come onto someone's property,' she said. 'That crosses a line.' Like I said, times have changed, and so have the rules of engagement. The law doesn't matter anymore, both sides use it to their own advantage to suit their own agenda. Problem is their side is protecting them, our side isn't, so we're taking matters into our own hands. Just so happens that we also support the Blue, and in return we're getting the same. Govt officials and judicial are backing the nignog/commies as well. |
| uscrusader1
User ID: 74244510 United States07/15/2020 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78913612 United States07/15/2020 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SiniXster the Dread Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are. You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe. Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. There is no such thing as Systematic Racism against Blacks, the system is racist against EVERYONE that isn't part of it, or self-made enough to live outside of it. Go back to the basement and smoke some more fucking meth, junky, you're fucking clueless. I pray you can't procreate. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79149311 United States07/15/2020 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 61724142 United States07/15/2020 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. I disagree, that DA is a Soros paid for DA, and she is their to do George Soros approved destruction. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72430464 United States07/15/2020 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SiniXster the Dread Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are. You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe. Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. I suppose this Black DA is a racist then to, right Ignoramus. [link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)] BLM is primarily a marxist organization with a marxist agenda they don’t give a shit about black lives unless they can use the death of a violent thug as a triggering point for their long planned marxist venda, and you are just a useful idiot parroting bullshit about statistically insignificant “systematic racism”. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78913612 United States07/15/2020 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. Oh really? Then why wasn’t this black DA and her husband arrested and charged? Why wasn’t their home raided and firearms confiscated? From the dailymail: LA's first black DA slams BLM for targeting her after her husband pulled a gun on protesters at their home and says defunding the police would lead to lawlessness The group arranged chairs and prayed on the sidewalk but did not initially approach Lacey's property until Abdullah and two others went to the front door. Then, they said, they heard a gun cock. 'I thought I was being paranoid, and I said, 'That didn't sound good,' Abdullah told the Los Angeles Times. 'And then her husband opened the door and pointed a gun and said. 'Get off my porch.' Lacey apologized for the incident in the immediate aftermath. But in Saturday's CNN interview, she said that the activists had crossed a line. 'I definitely don't think you should be able to come onto someone's property,' she said. 'That crosses a line.' Like I said, times have changed, and so have the rules of engagement. The law doesn't matter anymore, both sides use it to their own advantage to suit their own agenda. Problem is their side is protecting them, our side isn't, so we're taking matters into our own hands. Just so happens that we also support the Blue, and in return we're getting the same. Govt officials and judicial are backing the nignog/commies as well. And the ones that are supposed to have our backs are too fucking scared to step up, go figure. |
| uscrusader1
User ID: 74244510 United States07/15/2020 10:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. I disagree, that DA is a Soros paid for DA, and she is there to do George Soros approved destruction. ^^^This^^^ Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 07/15/2020 10:57 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79150854 United States07/15/2020 10:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The homeowners were wrong in this case. Their first obligation is their duty to retreat which they did not do. They did the exact opposite. The "private" property you are all discussing is not theirs. Quoting: Ignatius J Do a little research on these folks. They are charlatans and you all are now falling for their shtick. And to the rest of you here: Your irrational fear of black and brown folks does not give you the right to intimidate them with firearms. Your lives aren't in danger every time someone of a different race crosses your path. The saddest part is that you are so scared that you automatically "fear for your life". This is also the reason that police shoot unarmed people of color at a inordinate rate. Do your own fucking research dumbass, more whites, both armed and unarmed are shot every year by cops than blacks are. You're not only full of shit, you're an anti-American piece of shit, fuck off douchecanoe.  |
| SerenaSeesAll
User ID: 78926188 United States07/15/2020 10:56 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them.  ============================================================= Noticing Miracles Is My Hobby The Bible - When you carry the Bible, Satan has a headache, when you open it, he collapses, when he sees you reading it, he loses his strength, AND when you stand on the Word of God, Satan can't hurt you! |
| Loops
User ID: 1086723 United States07/15/2020 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. wouldn't they just need to provide evidence that the protesters had bad intentions? I don't see any difference between this or ol'lady shooting her 44 magnum at a burglar is her house. You don't see the difference between someone inside your house stealing shit and someone outside on the street, outside of a house? How the FUCK do you not see the difference? Are you a middle school inbreed drop out or something? It would take a full blown retard not see the difference. “One life is all we have and we live it as we believe in living it. But to sacrifice what you are and to live without belief, that is a fate more terrible than dying.” |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77806702 United States07/15/2020 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. They met potential deadly force with their own potential deadly force. Totally reasonable given the history and circumstances. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 48642722 United States07/15/2020 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They should have opened fire and taken down a few. We need to get the race war started so we can finally deal with the inner city problem. Quoting: MessiahTrump They could've legally opened fire on every one of those street chimps the moment they broke and entered through his gate and terrorized them on their front lawn and threatened to kill them and burn their house down. Stand your ground 2A laws. Imagine if the race roles were reversed. The White protestors would be charged with home invasion and domestic terrorism. The black couple would be praised by the media for weeks as heroes. |
| Debug
User ID: 78876417 United States07/15/2020 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. This 1000% Only time you point your gun at someone is right before you pull the trigger. But in their defense, she had obviously never used a gun before and he might not have either. Given the circumstances the DA should look the other way, but they will probably charge them and send them to the can. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71910323 United States07/15/2020 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74827762 United States07/15/2020 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. True. But the couple were libtards without proper training Records did show they donated way more to the DNC than the GOP. They were both lawyers, after all, a profession dominated by liberals, not conservatives. Ambulance chasing, anyone? They apparently were also into helping lower-income, mainly non-white clients pro bono. Which is fine and all - even nice for struggling people stuck with legal problems - but it does indicate they probably were more lukewarm about or even somewhat resentful towards Donald Trump and MAGA instead of, hey, we'll defend him with our rifles. |
| E User ID: 7279210 United States07/15/2020 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. Oh really? Then why wasn’t this black DA and her husband arrested and charged? Why wasn’t their home raided and firearms confiscated? From the dailymail: LA's first black DA slams BLM for targeting her after her husband pulled a gun on protesters at their home and says defunding the police would lead to lawlessness The group arranged chairs and prayed on the sidewalk but did not initially approach Lacey's property until Abdullah and two others went to the front door. Then, they said, they heard a gun cock. 'I thought I was being paranoid, and I said, 'That didn't sound good,' Abdullah told the Los Angeles Times. 'And then her husband opened the door and pointed a gun and said. 'Get off my porch.' Lacey apologized for the incident in the immediate aftermath. But in Saturday's CNN interview, she said that the activists had crossed a line. 'I definitely don't think you should be able to come onto someone's property,' she said. 'That crosses a line.' Apparently it needs to be restated that there is no right to protest INDIVIDUALS. The right to demonstrate to address grievances with govt does not and CANNOT be applied to any individual a mob chooses. It is prelude to a lynching and removing a person's right to be secure on their property. Not to mention there's no right to intimidate any nongovt INDIVIDUALS or their family. You don't have assembly rights on the property of those that don't want you there no matter what the fuck some unconstitutional law or interpretation claims. The real issue is that you can't find a fucking honest lawyer to take that case an win, you'll just get fucked like Flynn and bankrupt as well as fucked. |
| Watcher68
Watcher User ID: 69248890 United States07/15/2020 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. I respectively disagree. As soon as you perceive your life is in danger, you have the right to defend yourself. We have all seen how quickly these situations escalate. I would argue that as soon as the group broke the gate to get in, castle doctrine comes into play. Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America : 1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized. 2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims. 3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government. 4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer. 5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about. 6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries. |
| uscrusader1
User ID: 74244510 United States07/15/2020 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. This 1000% Only time you point your gun at someone is right before you pull the trigger. But in their defense, she had obviously never used a gun before and he might not have either. Given the circumstances the DA should look the other way, but they will probably charge them and send them to the can. Death threats from an armed mob on private property, this is self defense. |
| Ignatius J
User ID: 79117186 United States07/15/2020 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Ignatius J Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. I suppose this Black DA is a racist then to, right Ignoramus. [link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)] BLM is primarily a marxist organization with a marxist agenda they don’t give a shit about black lives unless they can use the death of a violent thug as a triggering point for their long planned marxist venda, and you are just a useful idiot parroting bullshit about statistically insignificant “systematic racism”. What does BLM have to do with institutional racism? BLM is a relatively new organization and institutional racism has been going on for 400 years. Your link to an individual does not in any way refute the issue of something that is systematic. Your use of buzzwords shows your fear of folks that look differently than you do and is a prime example of what I'm talking about. "I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip." |
| GonadTheBallbarian
User ID: 76882965 United States07/15/2020 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Ignatius J Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. There is no such thing as Systematic Racism against Blacks, the system is racist against EVERYONE that isn't part of it, or self-made enough to live outside of it. Go back to the basement and smoke some more fucking meth, junky, you're fucking clueless. I pray you can't procreate. The irony of the 'systemic racism" argument is that they are the ones creating actual systemic racism these days. Whodathunkit? I'd rather be real and rejected than fake and accepted. Individualism is the logical conclusion of rational political/social opinions. Leftism is the absence of any. |
| uscrusader1
User ID: 74244510 United States07/15/2020 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SiniXster the Dread They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. There is no such thing as Systematic Racism against Blacks, the system is racist against EVERYONE that isn't part of it, or self-made enough to live outside of it. Go back to the basement and smoke some more fucking meth, junky, you're fucking clueless. I pray you can't procreate. The irony of the 'systemic racism" argument is that they are the ones creating actual systemic racism these days. Whodathunkit? Psychological Protection |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79150854 United States07/15/2020 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. Wait a minute! The St. Louis police are ordered not to respond to calls by mayor. Mayor and elected officials were condoning and exciting lawlessness. I'd say one could make a good argument that when this incident occurred all laws were in effect suspended in St. Louis. What sense does it make to argue for anarchy then argue these homeowners weren't simply part of the anarchy? |
| GoyFawkes User ID: 75665034 United States07/15/2020 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem with what they did was pointing the firearms at the protesters.. Quoting: ^TrInItY^ Every responsible firearm owner knows you CANNOT point your weapon at someone as a form of intimidation. Had they stood there with their weapons slung or holstered and not pointed at the protesters the DA would have nothing on them. wouldn't they just need to provide evidence that the protesters had bad intentions? I don't see any difference between this or ol'lady shooting her 44 magnum at a burglar is her house. The protesters never crossed their property line as far as I know.. They were just walking by making bunch of noise.. Honestly the only time it would have been appropriate to point a gun at them is if they feared for their lives and then you better fucking shoot them. Pointing a gun at someone is a big fucking deal and you better not do it unless you intend to pull the trigger. The protesters never had a permit to protest at or near that couples home. That is all. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7279210 United States07/15/2020 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Ignatius J Evidently math wasn't your strong suit. When I state that an inordinate amount of unarmed people of color are shot, that means that they are killed at a higher percentage. Take it easy there David Duke---your hood is showing They kill themselves at a higher percentage, that's their cultural issue, not mine. You capped your statement about our irrational fear of blacks and browns, now accompany that with the statement about them being killed at a higher percentage, BY THEIR OWN RACE. Do you not see the bullshit in your agenda driven post? I sure the fuck do. Nobody denies that black on black crime is a problem. The obvious issue, as noted by your reaction, is systematic racism within the institutions of law enforcement and white supremacy. There is no such thing as Systematic Racism against Blacks, the system is racist against EVERYONE that isn't part of it, or self-made enough to live outside of it. Go back to the basement and smoke some more fucking meth, junky, you're fucking clueless. I pray you can't procreate. Ghetto culture is CRIMINAL and predator culture so naturally episodes with police will be common and serious. All manner of human degradation is fully accepted, but obedience to even the most common social and civilized behavior is right out? Uh huh, not buying any of those wolf tickets, you can fuck all that, it's bullshit from functional retards and defectives 'signifying' to de wite debils. |
