Virology is a Pseudoscience: Potato Necrosis and F.C. Bawden

16 years ago I studied the history and field of virology all the way back to its origins in the 19th century.

I concluded that virology is a pseudoscience and a fraud that misrepresent endogenous cellular particles as infectious organisms.

I concluded that these virus particle were in reality endogenous cellular signalling particles and endogenous cellular transport particles. They cause disease when an organism over produces these particles.

I also concluded that all virological diseases are not infectious disease but instead most were either caused by toxicological exposures or nutrient deficiencies (like the pellagra virus). Certain other biological stressors can also cause the over prodcution of "virus" particles by an organism.

A couple months ago I posted "Peyton Rous and his chickens". This was a short review on how Peyton Rous accidentally proved that cancer viruses are not self-replicating infectious organisms but in reality were endogenous cellular particles behaving as finite toxins due to their over abundance.

-------------------------

In this post I shall review very long paper by a virologist named F.C. Bawden. The paper is called, "Studies on a Virus Causing Foliar Necrosis of the Potato". It was publish in 1934 by Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

FC Bawden found the same thing that Peyton Rous found. That viruses are not infinitely transmissible and in fact loose potency rather fast.

This is what you would expect if viruses are not self-replicaing infectious organisms but in reality are finite particles behaving as finite toxins due to their over abundance in the organism.

Some examples:

He found that grafting a leaf full of the virus to a healthy potato plant would produce potent symptoms in the healthy plant. However if you used a leaf full of the virus to transfer virus to a healthy plant using needle inoculation the symptoms in the healthy plant would be very weak.

This is what you would expect if the virus is not a self-replicating organism. The needle inoculation method transfers a low dose of the virus. If viruses behave like finite toxins then one would expect very dose dependent reactions int he healthy receiver. This is exactly what Bawden, and also Rous with his chickens, reported.


Bawden also found that when performing his leaf grafting experiments that sometimes a graft would take poorly to the healthy plant. The leaf would never really attach that well. In these experiments he found that the symptoms in the healthy plant would be weaker. This makes sense because a lower dose of the virus was being transfered to the healthy plant by the faulty graft. Once again showing that virus behave in a strongly dose dependent manner.


When doing his leaf grafting research Bawden found that in potato plants that he was able to transfer a large dose of virus to the tubers had an interesting property.

If one planted these tubers in the soil they would produce a new plant that did in fact have the potato necrosis disease. However, the disease in these new plants was clearly a milder version of the disease. Once again showing that the virus was not behaving like a self replicating organism. It was behaving like a finite toxin.

It should be pointed out now that F.C Bawden was a conventional virologist and, just like Rous, did not come to the conclusions in his paper that I came to. In fact he out right ignore the obvious evidence that he had uncovered.

This is not surprising however as this is what almost all virologist do. The whole history of virology consist of paper after paper showing that virus are not infectious organisms. But almost every virologist just tows the party line and goes along to get along.

Virology has been used for evil ends since its origins with the agricultural chemist Adolf Mayer. It's original purpose was to cover up the damage being done to crops by industrial pesticides like Paris Green.

Paris Green was causing various new diseases in plant crops, such as the mosaic disorders of tobacco plant. Paris green also caused a disease very similar to polio in the late 19th century.

Later in the 20th century DDT caused the classic polio epidemic. Virology was used to cover that up as well.

This is for the 1/1000 non mentally retarded, thinking people that might actually visit this forum:

[link to www.amazon.com (secure)]

[link to www.amazon.com (secure)]

It's all documented. It's all fraud. There are no 'viruses'.

There are only poisons.

16 years ago I studied the history and field of virology all the way back to its origins in the 19th century.

I concluded that virology is a pseudoscience and a fraud that misrepresent endogenous cellular particles as infectious organisms.

I concluded that these virus particle were in reality endogenous cellular signalling particles and endogenous cellular transport particles. They cause disease when an organism over produces these particles.

I also concluded that all virological diseases are not infectious disease but instead most were either caused by toxicological exposures or nutrient deficiencies (like the pellagra virus). Certain other biological stressors can also cause the over prodcution of "virus" particles by an organism.

A couple months ago I posted "Peyton Rous and his chickens". This was a short review on how Peyton Rous accidentally proved that cancer viruses are not self-replicating infectious organisms but in reality were endogenous cellular particles behaving as finite toxins due to their over abundance.

-------------------------

In this post I shall review very long paper by a virologist named F.C. Bawden. The paper is called, "Studies on a Virus Causing Foliar Necrosis of the Potato". It was publish in 1934 by Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

FC Bawden found the same thing that Peyton Rous found. That viruses are not infinitely transmissible and in fact loose potency rather fast.
the bacteria is the soldier.

This is what you would expect if viruses are not self-replicaing infectious organisms but in reality are finite particles behaving as finite toxins due to their over abundance in the organism.

Some examples:

He found that grafting a leaf full of the virus to a healthy potato plant would produce potent symptoms in the healthy plant. However if you used a leaf full of the virus to transfer virus to a healthy plant using needle inoculation the symptoms in the healthy plant would be very weak.

This is what you would expect if the virus is not a self-replicating organism. The needle inoculation method transfers a low dose of the virus. If viruses behave like finite toxins then one would expect very dose dependent reactions int he healthy receiver. This is exactly what Bawden, and also Rous with his chickens, reported.


Bawden also found that when performing his leaf grafting experiments that sometimes a graft would take poorly to the healthy plant. The leaf would never really attach that well. In these experiments he found that the symptoms in the healthy plant would be weaker. This makes sense because a lower dose of the virus was being transfered to the healthy plant by the faulty graft. Once again showing that virus behave in a strongly dose dependent manner.


When doing his leaf grafting research Bawden found that in potato plants that he was able to transfer a large dose of virus to the tubers had an interesting property.

If one planted these tubers in the soil they would produce a new plant that did in fact have the potato necrosis disease. However, the disease in these new plants was clearly a milder version of the disease. Once again showing that the virus was not behaving like a self replicating organism. It was behaving like a finite toxin.

It should be pointed out now that F.C Bawden was a conventional virologist and, just like Rous, did not come to the conclusions in his paper that I came to. In fact he out right ignore the obvious evidence that he had uncovered.

This is not surprising however as this is what almost all virologist do. The whole history of virology consist of paper after paper showing that virus are not infectious organisms. But almost every virologist just tows the party line and goes along to get along.

Virology has been used for evil ends since its origins with the agricultural chemist Adolf Mayer. It's original purpose was to cover up the damage being done to crops by industrial pesticides like Paris Green.

Paris Green was causing various new diseases in plant crops, such as the mosaic disorders of tobacco plant. Paris green also caused a disease very similar to polio in the late 19th century.

Later in the 20th century DDT caused the classic polio epidemic. Virology was used to cover that up as well.